Core 2 Quad Q9550 [in 7 benchmarks]
Intel
Core 2 Quad Q9550
Buy
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
Summary
This is an Yorkfield architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 4 cores and 4 threads, and is based on 45 manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 2830 MHz and a locked multiplier.
Compatibility-wise, this is LGA775 processor with a TDP of 95 Watt. It supports DDR1,DDR2,DDR3 memory.
It provides poor benchmark performance at
2.30%
of a leader’s which is AMD EPYC 7h22.
Core 2
Quad Q9550
vs
EPYC
7h22
General info
Core 2 Quad Q9550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.
| Place in performance rating | 1856 | |
| Value for money | 2.80 | |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | |
| Series | Core 2 Quad (Desktop) | |
| Architecture codename | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | |
| Release date | no data | |
| Current price | $54 | of 28675 (Xeon Platinum 8280L) |
Value for money
To get the index we compare the characteristics of the processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.
- 0
- 50
- 100
Technical specs
Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state.
These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | |
| Threads | 4 | |
| Boost clock speed | 2.83 GHz | of 8.3 (Ryzen 7 7700) |
| Bus support | 1333 MHz | |
| L2 cache | 12288 KB | |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | of 4 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) |
| 64 bit support | + | |
| Windows 11 compatibility | — | |
| Unlocked multiplier | — |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad Q9550 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc.
Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | LGA775 | |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 95 Watt | of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282) |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9550’s memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1,DDR2,DDR3 | of 5600 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) |
Benchmark performance
Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Core 2 Quad Q9550. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core 2 Quad Q9550
2.30
- Passmark
- GeekBench 5 Single-Core
- GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
- 3DMark06 CPU
- Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 67%
Core 2 Quad Q9550
2316
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
Core 2 Quad Q9550
414
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
Core 2 Quad Q9550
1321
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D.
Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Core 2 Quad Q9550
3106
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Core 2 Quad Q9550
10825
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Core 2 Quad Q9550
4230
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads.
A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Core 2 Quad Q9550
3
Relative perfomance
Overall Core 2 Quad Q9550 performance compared to nearest competitors among desktop CPUs.
AMD Athlon II X4 645
100.43
AMD A8-3850
100.43
AMD A8-3870K
100
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
100
AMD A10-6700T
99.57
AMD Phenom II X4 840T
99.57
AMD Phenom II X4 850
99.57
AMD equivalent
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Core 2 Quad Q9550 by AMD is A8-3870K, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 1 position in our rating.
A8
3870K
Compare
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Core 2 Quad Q9550:
AMD Athlon II X4 645
100.43
AMD A8-3850
100.43
AMD A8-3870K
100
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
100
AMD Phenom II X4 850
99.57
AMD A10-6700T
99.57
AMD Phenom II X4 840T
99.57
Similar processors
Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Core 2
Quad Q9500
Compare
Core 2
Extreme QX6700
Compare
Core 2
Quad Q6600
Compare
Best GPUs for Core 2 Quad Q9550
These graphics cards are most commonly used with Core 2 Quad Q9550 according to our statistics, based on user self-reported PC configurations.
GeForce GTX
750 Ti
6%
GeForce GT
1030
4.7%
GeForce GTX
550 Ti
4.2%
GeForce GT
730
3.9%
GeForce GTX
650
3.6%
GeForce GT
710
3.6%
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
3.4%
GeForce GTS
450
2.
7%
GeForce GTX
660
2.6%
Radeon RX
550
1.8%
These are the fastest GPUs paired with Core 2 Quad Q9550 in our user configurations.
There is a total of 4499 configurations based on Core 2 Quad Q9550 in our database.
GeForce RTX
4090
0.04% (2/4499)
GeForce RTX
4080
0.02% (1/4499)
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
0.2% (9/4499)
Radeon RX
6950 XT
0.
04% (2/4499)
GeForce RTX
3080 Ti
0.4% (17/4499)
GeForce RTX
3090
0.2% (10/4499)
Radeon RX
6900 XT
0.07% (3/4499)
Radeon RX
6800 XT
0.04% (2/4499)
GeForce RTX
3070 Ti
0.04% (2/4499)
GeForce RTX
3070
0.02% (1/4499)
User rating
Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users.
Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9550, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550S: A New 65W Quad-Core
by Anand Lal Shimpion January 27, 2009 8:00 PM EST
- Posted in
- CPUs
62 Comments
|
62 Comments
IndexAdobe Photoshop CS4 Performancex264 HD Video Encoding PerformancePOV-Ray 3.73 beta 23 Ray Tracing PerformancePAR2 Multithreaded Archive Recovery PerformanceFallout 3 Game PerformanceFarCry 2 Multithreaded Game PerformanceFinal Words: So Who Should Buy This Thing?
In one breath Intel dramatically cut pricing on its Core 2 Quads. Intel’s swift response was even faster than NVIDIA’s after the RV770 launch.
In the following breath however, Intel introduced new, lower power, and much higher priced Core 2 Quad CPUs. Enter the S-line.
TDP binning is something that AMD has done for quite a while on the desktop. The e-suffix parts (e.g. Phenom X4 9350e) are lower TDP parts, sold at a premium, to those users who need lower power consumption.
The Phenom X4 9350e and the 9150e are both 65W quad-core parts from AMD, while all of Intel’s quad-core CPUs have been 95W. Unwilling to allow AMD any sort of advantage, Intel has finally responded with 65W quad-core offerings of its own. The difference here is that while AMD’s 65W quad-cores are all significantly lower clocked Phenom processors, Intel’s 65W chips are available at up to 2.83GHz.
The Core 2 Quad Q9550S, Q9400S and Q8200S are all 65W TDP quad-core CPUs. They share the same specs as their non-S brethren. The only difference here is that instead of being 95W TDP parts, these CPUs can fit in a 65W thermal envelope.
| Processor | Clock Speed | L2 Cache | L3 Cache | TDP | Price |
| Intel Core i7-965 Extreme Edition | 3.20GHz | 1MB | 8MB | 130W | $999 |
| Intel Core i7-940 | 2. 93GHz |
1MB | 8MB | 130W | $562 |
| Intel Core i7-920 | 2.66GHz | 1MB | 8MB | 130W | $284 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 | 3.00GHz | 12MB | — | 95W | $316 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550S | 2.83GHz | 12MB | — | 65W | $369 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 | 2. 83GHz |
12MB | — | 95W | $266 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400S | 2.66GHz | 6MB | — | 65W | $320 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 | 2.66GHz | 6MB | — | 95W | $213 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300 | 2. 50GHz |
4MB | — | 95W | $183 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200S | 2.33GHz | 4MB | — | 65W | $245 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 | 2.33GHz | 4MB | — | 95W | $163 |
The price premium for these new S-parts is huge.
The Q9550S costs $103 more than the non-S, the Q9400S will set you back another $107 and the Q8200S is the most affordable with only an $82 premium. Note that in the case of the Q9550S and Q9400S you’re actually more expensive than the entry level Core i7-920.
Intel achieves these lower TDPs by running at a lower core voltage. With a mature enough manufacturing process, which Intel’s 45nm process is, it’s quite possible to produce CPUs that run much cooler than average and on a lower voltage. CPU power varies with the square of the voltage, so any savings in voltage can result in a non-linear decrease in power consumption.
Don’t get too excited however. If you remember back to our review of the 9350e/9150e we found that the decrease in power wasn’t worth the added price. Even Intel has come forward and told us that these are primarily OEM parts and not intended for the high volume enthusiast community. With Intel being honest in its intended purpose for these S-class CPUs we don’t really have to do much to keep them honest, we just need to confirm the findings.
To do this we took a subset of our regular CPU performance tests and looked at performance, power consumption and power efficiency. We measured total system power consumption at the wall outlet, which does admittedly lessen the impact of a lower power CPU but it should give us an idea of the real world benefit of these processors. If you want to see how the Q9550/Q9550S performs across our entire suite of benchmarks take a look at AnandTech bench, our new publicly available benchmark database.
…and in case you’re wondering, no, they don’t overclock any better. Our Q9550S couldn’t get any further than the Q9550 we used in our Phenom II review.
The Test
| CPU: | AMD Phenom II X4 940 (3.0GHz) AMD Phenom 9950 (2.6GHz) Intel Core i7-965 (3.2GHz) Intel Core i7-920 (2.  66GHz)Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770 (3.2GHz/1600MHz) Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 (3.00GHz) Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550S (2.83GHz) Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 (2.66GHz) Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 (2.66GHz) |
| Motherboard: | Intel DX58SO (Intel X58) Intel DX48BT2 (Intel X48) MSI DKA790GX Platinum (AMD 790GX) |
| Chipset: | Intel X48 Intel X58 AMD 790GX |
| Chipset Drivers: | Intel 9.1.1.1010 (Intel) AMD Catalyst 8.12 |
| Hard Disk: | Intel X25-M SSD (80GB) |
| Memory: | G. Skill DDR2-800 2 x 2GB (4-4-4-12)G.Skill DDR2-1066 2 x 2GB (5-5-5-15) Qimonda DDR3-1066 4 x 1GB (7-7-7-20) |
| Video Card: | eVGA GeForce GTX 280 |
| Video Drivers: | NVIDIA ForceWare 180.43 (Vista64) |
| Desktop Resolution: | 1920 x 1200 |
| OS: | Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit |
Adobe Photoshop CS4 Performance
IndexAdobe Photoshop CS4 Performancex264 HD Video Encoding PerformancePOV-Ray 3.73 beta 23 Ray Tracing PerformancePAR2 Multithreaded Archive Recovery PerformanceFallout 3 Game PerformanceFarCry 2 Multithreaded Game PerformanceFinal Words: So Who Should Buy This Thing?
Tweet
PRINT THIS ARTICLE
Review and testing of the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 processor | Read useful articles online
General information and characteristics of the processor
Intel has again updated its range with a rather attractive, judging by the characteristics, Core 2 Quad Q9550 processor.
Here we will take a closer look at it.
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 runs at 2.83 GHz with 12 MB L2 cache. Agree, this is an impressive amount of cache. The processor is made according to the 45 nm process technology, which should guarantee it high performance with a more modest heat dissipation compared to processors made using a thicker process technology, and a more advanced process technology should provide it with decent overclocking, which we will see a little later. Q9550 is the big brother of Q9450? from which it is distinguished only by a larger multiplier (9, as opposed to 8.5 for the Q9450) and a slightly higher clock frequency (2.66 GHz for the Core 2 Quad Q9450).
We state the above distinguishing features of the main Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550:
- the above-mentioned 45 nm technological standard;
- reduced power consumption and heat dissipation;
- implementation of support for SSE4.1 instructions;
- increase L2 cache up to 12 MB; nine0012
- optimization and improvement of execution unit algorithms.
The processor comes in a blue «wrapper» already familiar to us, with windows through which you can see the heat distributing cover of the processor and the boxed cooler. The design of the box itself is traditional for this model range. For those who do not yet know its characteristics and specifications when buying a processor, they can be read on the box without violating its integrity, the indicators of which are transparent stickers on the sides of the box with inscriptions from Intel. nine0005
The delivery set is quite common for Intel processors — it is a cooler with a copper core E21984-001, an installation guide, a 3-year warranty, which is standard for box versions of processors, and of course, an Intel branded sticker on the case..
Judging by the tests , this cooler looks relatively efficient and quiet. It is even capable of cooling even slightly overclocked quad-core processors.
All basic information can also be seen on the heat spreader cover of the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550:
- marking SLAWQ;
- operating frequency 2.
83 GHz;
- L2 cache 12 MB;
- system bus frequency 1333 MHz;
- requirements for the PCG 05A motherboard power module;
- country of origin.
The processor is «trained» to perform a number of proprietary Intel technologies:
- Enhanced Halt State (C1E) is used to turn off some processor blocks during its inactivity to reduce power consumption and, consequently, heat dissipation; nine0012
- Enhanced Intel Speedstep Technology allows you to reset the supply voltage and clock speed during low processor load, thereby also saving energy;
- Intel Thermal Monitor 2 — monitors the temperature of the processor and, if a critical heating point is reached, a set of measures is taken, for example, a pulse skip cycle, the so-called Throttling, a decrease in the operating frequency and operating voltage, preventing system failure.
Intel Virtualization Technology allows virtual machines to access hardware resources.
All the main features of the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 processor can be seen in the CPU-Z utility.
Testing
The figure below compares the performance of the tested processor in comparison with other popular models in various applications:
The Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 processor looks quite proud compared to the models of its line in terms of speed and performance. According to the test results, it is on average 6% ahead of its younger brother Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450, but the differences between them are not so significant. The difference in clock frequency is 166 MHz, due to the 0.5 higher multiplier. But the rest of the processors in this line of Core 2 Quad are ahead by a good margin, thanks to a faster bus, a large amount of L2 cache, and a fairly high clock speed.
Unfortunately, when working with 3D applications, i. games, the leadership is intercepted by 2x core Intel processors, tk. developers of modern games do not work on optimizing games for multithreading. But on the other hand, our processor under consideration can show itself «in all its glory» when modeling and when working with digital data and processing them. for example, converting and processing music and video, and this processor has a good archiving speed. nine0005
Overclocking
It’s time to explore the overclocking potential of this processor. The overclocking potential of the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 with the revision C1 core was a pleasant surprise, since this was not expected from the C1. For stable operation of the processor at a frequency of 4038 MHz, it was necessary to increase the voltage on the core to only 1.384 V, which indicates that the processor is not working at the limit, because. the allowable voltage for this line is 1.45 V, that is, with such overclocking, it is quite possible to use the processor in 24/7 mode at a moderate heating temperature. The system bus was increased to 475 MHz. As a result, we have a 40% higher frequency than the nominal, which is quite good, especially considering that we get additional performance absolutely free. nine0005
The results of overclocking in computing applications and games are as follows:
As expected, the performance gain from overclocking reaches 40%, that is, once again we prove the direct performance scalability from overclocking. In gaming applications, of course, this is not observed, but this is due to the fact that less depends on the processor in games.
Conclusions
In general, summing up, we can say that the Core 2 Quad Q9550 processor, thanks to its high operating frequency, fast bus and large L2 cache memory, turned out to be very productive, and with moderate heat dissipation. As a result of a good stable overclocking, you can get up to 40% increase in performance from it. But due to the fact that most games are not optimized for 4-core multithreading, in games it fails to show such a high result, unlike computational tasks. In general, if we judge the majority of everyday tasks performed by an ordinary user, then the processor copes with them very quickly, so it will suit many. nine0005
Core 2 Quad Q9550 [in 7 benchmarks]
Intel
Core 2 Quad Q9550
- Interface
- Core frequency
- Video memory size
- Memory type
- Memory frequency
- Maximum resolution
Description
This is a Yorkfield architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 4 cores and 4 threads and is manufactured according to process 45, the maximum frequency is 2830 MHz, the multiplier is locked. nine0005
In terms of compatibility, this is an LGA775 socket processor with a TDP of 95W. It supports DDR1,DDR2,DDR3 memory.
It provides poor benchmark performance at
2.30%
from the leader, which is AMD EPYC 7h22.
Core 2
Quad Q9550
vs
Value for money To obtain an index, we compare the characteristics of processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.
Core 2 Quad Q9550 quantitative parameters such as number of cores and threads, clock speeds, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. They indirectly speak about the performance of the processor, but for an accurate assessment, you need to consider the results of the tests. nine550 with the rest of the computer components. Useful, for example, when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one. Please note that the power consumption of some processors can significantly exceed their nominal TDP even without overclocking. Some may even double their claims if the motherboard allows you to adjust the power settings of the processor. 90,000 9009 900
These are the results of Core 2 Quad Q9550 performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment. This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. nine0005
Core 2 Quad Q9550 nine0021 Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test. Benchmark coverage: 67%
Core 2 Quad Q9550 GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can be used to accurately measure performance. This version uses only one processor core. nine0005 Benchmark coverage: 37%
Core 2 Quad Q9550 GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. Benchmark coverage: 37%
nine0081 Core 2 Quad Q9550 Cinebench R10 is a very outdated ray tracing benchmark for processors developed by the authors of Cinema 4D, Maxon. The Single-Core version uses a single CPU thread to render a futuristic motorcycle model. Benchmark coverage: 20%
Core 2 Quad Q9550 Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 that uses all processor threads. The possible number of threads in this version is limited to 16. Benchmark coverage: 19%
Core 2 Quad Q9550 3DMark06 is an outdated set of benchmarks based on DirectX 9 by Futuremark. Its processor part contains two tests, one of which calculates the pathfinding of game AI, the other emulates game physics using the PhysX package. Benchmark coverage: 19%
Core 2 Quad Q9550 Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 that uses all processor threads. This version supports a maximum of 64 threads. Benchmark coverage: 17%
Core 2 Quad Q9550
Overall performance of Core 2 Quad Q9550 compared to its closest competitors in desktop processors.
AMD Athlon II X4 645
AMD A8-3850
AMD A8-3870K
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
nine0081 AMD A10-6700T
AMD Phenom II X4 840T
AMD Phenom II X4 850
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Core 2 Quad Q9550 from AMD is A8-3870K, which is approximately equal in speed and higher by 1 position in our rating.
Compare
Here are some of AMD’s closest competitors to the Core 2 Quad Q9550:
AMD Athlon II X4 645
AMD A8-3850
AMD A8-3870K
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
AMD Phenom II X4 850
AMD A10-6700T
AMD Phenom II X4 840T Here we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.
Compare
Compare
Compare There are 4499 configurations based on Core 2 Quad Q9550 in our database. Statistically most often used with Core 2 Quad Q9550 these graphics cards: 6% 4.7% 4.2% nine0004 3.9% 3.6% 3.6% 3.4% 2.7% 2. 1.8% Here are the most powerful graphics cards used with Core 2 Quad Q9550 according to user statistics: 0.04% (2/4499) nine0116 0.02% (1/4499) 0.2% (9/4499) 0.04% (2/4499) nine0004 0.4% (17/4499) 0.2% (10/4499) 0.07% (3/4499) 0.
EPYC
nine
Features
Socket
LGA775
Energy consumption (TDP)
95 W
of 400 (XEON Platinum 9282)
Types, maximum amount and channels of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9550. Higher memory frequency may be supported depending on the motherboard.
RAM types
DDR1,DDR2,DDR3
out of 5600 (Ryzen 9 7940HS)
Benchmark tests
Overall performance in tests
2.30
5 64-bit multi-core
Passmark
2316
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
414
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
This version uses all available processor cores.
1321
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
3106
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
10825
3DMark06 CPU
nine0005
4230
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
3
Relative capacity
100.43
100.43
100
100
99.57
99.57
99.57
Competitor from AMD
A8
nine0118 3870K
100.43
100.43
100
nine0118 100
99.57
99.57
99.57
Other processors
Core 2
nine0118 Quad Q9500
Core 2
Extreme QX6700
Core 2
Quad Q6600
Best graphics cards for Core 2 Quad Q9550
GeForce GTX
750 Ti
GeForce GT
1030
GeForce GTX
550 Ti
GeForce GT
730
GeForce GTX
650
GeForce GT
710
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce GTS
450
GeForce GTX
660
6%
Radeon RX
550
GeForce RTX
4090
GeForce RTX
4080
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
Radeon RX
6950XT
GeForce RTX
3080 Ti
GeForce RTX
3090
Radeon RX
6900XT
Radeon RX
6800XT
