AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs Intel Core i5-8400
| 28 May20|Techpowerup Intel Core i5-10400F Review — Six … |
0 % | FarC5 10%, Witcher3 1%, MetroEx 6%, Sekiro 11%, Wolf2 1% | BFV 4%, SotTR 4%, Rage2 5%, Civ6 1%, ACO 12% | |||
| 30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki… |
SotTR 1% | 4 % | Hitm2 14%, TWarW2 5%, F118 2%, GTAV 2% | |||
| 14 Nov19|PCGamer AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review |
FarC5 6%, StrangeB 1%, MetroEx 2%, MESoW 3% | 2 % | Hitm2 4%, TWarW2 4%, SotTR 1%, ACO 12%, Divis2 7% |
| Memory Avg. |
87.7 Pts | Lower memory latency. +14% |
77.1 Pts | |||
| 1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed |
116 Pts | 132 Pts | Faster single-core speed. +14% |
|||
| 2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed |
232 Pts | 257 Pts | Faster dual-core speed. +11% |
|||
| 4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed |
453 Pts | 478 Pts | Slightly faster quad-core speed. +6% |
|||
| 8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed |
612 Pts | 789 Pts | Faster octa-core speed. +29% |
| Memory OC Memory Latency |
94. 4 Pts |
Slightly lower OC memory latency. +9% |
86.9 Pts | |||
| 1-Core OC Single Core Speed |
122 Pts | 141 Pts | Faster OC single-core speed. +16% |
|||
| 2-Core OC Dual Core Speed |
242 Pts | 280 Pts | Faster OC dual-core speed. +16% |
|||
| 4-Core OC Quad Core Speed |
478 Pts | 536 Pts | Faster OC quad-core speed. +12% |
|||
| 8-Core OC Octa Core Speed |
684 Pts | 858 Pts | Faster OC octa-core speed. +25% |
| Age Newest |
61 Months | 40 Months | Much more recent. +34% |
|||
| TDP Thermal Design Power (TDP) |
65 Watts | 65 Watts | ||||
| Cores CPU Processing Cores |
6 cores | 6 cores | ||||
| Threads CPU Processing Threads |
6 threads | 12 threads | Hugely higher thread count. +100% |
|||
| Lithography Manufacturing process |
14 nm | 7 nm | Much newer manufacturing. +50% |
|||
| Base Clock Base Clock Speed |
2.8 GHz | 3.6 GHz | Faster base frequency. +29% |
|||
| Turbo Clock Turbo Clock Speed |
4 GHz | 4. 2 GHz |
+5% | |||
| 64-Core OC Multi Core Speed |
690 Pts | 1093 Pts | Much faster OC 64-core speed. +58% |
|||
| 64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed |
627 Pts | 995 Pts | Much faster 64-core speed. +59% |
| Series CPU Architecture |
Coffee Lake | Zen2 | ||||
| Socket Motherboard Socket |
FCLGA1151 | AM4 | ||||
| Graphics Integrated Graphics |
UHD 630 | None |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 vs Intel Core i5+8400: What is the difference?
57points
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
53points
Intel Core i5+8400
Comparison winner
vs
63 facts in comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Intel Core i5+8400
Why is AMD Ryzen 5 1600 better than Intel Core i5+8400?
- 14.
29% faster CPU speed?
6 x 3.2GHzvs6 x 2.8GHz - 6 more CPU threads?
12vs6 - 1.5MB bigger L2 cache?
3MBvs1.5MB - 6.1% higher PassMark result?
12398vs11685 - 7MB bigger L3 cache?
16MBvs9MB - 192KB bigger L1 cache?
576KBvs384KB - Has an unlocked multiplier?
- 0.25MB/core more L2 cache per core?
0.5MB/corevs0.25MB/core
Why is Intel Core i5+8400 better than AMD Ryzen 5 1600?
- 5°C higher maximum operating temperature?
100°Cvs95°C - 0.4GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4GHzvs3.6GHz - Has integrated graphics?
- 8.82% higher PassMark result (single)?
2270vs2086
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Core i5+8400
vs
Intel Core i3-9100F
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
Intel Core i5+8400
vs
Intel Core i7-3770
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Intel Core i5+8400
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Intel Core i5+8400
vs
Intel Core i7-4790K
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
Intel Core i5-9400F
Intel Core i5+8400
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i5+8400
vs
Intel Core i3-10100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
Intel Core i5+8400
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Core i5+8400
vs
Intel Core i3-8100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
Intel Core i5+8400
vs
Intel Core i7-6700
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Intel Core i5+8400
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
1 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
10.
0/10
1 User reviews
Intel Core i5+8400
2 User reviews
Intel Core i5+8400
10.0/10
2 User reviews
Features
Value for money
7.0/10
1 votes
10.0/10
2 votes
Gaming
10.0/10
1 votes
10.0/10
2 votes
Performance
10.0/10
1 votes
10.0/10
2 votes
Reliability
10.0/10
1 votes
10.0/10
2 votes
Energy efficiency
10.0/10
1 votes
10.0/10
2 votes
Performance
CPU speed
6 x 3.2GHz
6 x 2.8GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
turbo clock speed
3.6GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
Has an unlocked multiplier
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✖Intel Core i5+8400
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L2 core
0.
5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
L3 core
2.67MB/core
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Benchmarks
PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
Blender (bmw27) result
310.8seconds
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
Blender (classroom) result
948.6seconds
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene.
More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
performance per watt
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Integrated graphics
GPU clock speed
∅
Not applicable
350MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
GPU turbo
∅
Not applicable
1050MHz
When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
GPU execution units
∅
Not applicable
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)
A graphics processing unit (GPU) with a greater number of execution units can deliver better graphics.
supported displays
∅
Not applicable
Using multiple displays you can create a larger workspace, making it easier to work across multiple apps.
DirectX version
∅
Not applicable
DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
OpenGL version
∅
Not applicable
OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
OpenCL version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)
Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.
texture mapping units (TMUs)
∅
Not applicable
Unknown.
Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)
TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.
render output units (ROPs)
∅
Not applicable
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)
The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.
Memory
RAM speed
2667MHz
2666MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
maximum memory bandwidth
42.7GB/s
41.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM.
Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
bus transfer rate
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Supports ECC memory
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✖Intel Core i5+8400
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device.
For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Features
uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✔Intel Core i5+8400
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✔Intel Core i5+8400
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✔Intel Core i5+8400
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✔Intel Core i5+8400
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✔Intel Core i5+8400
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 5 1600
✖Intel Core i5+8400
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 1600)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5+8400)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
Intel Core i5 8400 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i5 8400
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Which is better: Intel Core i5 8400 at 2.8 GHz (with Turbo Boost up to 4.0) or AMD Ryzen 5 3600 at 3.6 GHz (with Turbo Core up to 4.2)? To find out, read our comparative testing of these 6-core desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one nucleus
Core i5 8400
48
Ryzen 5 3600
58
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks where all nuclei 9 are involved0003
Core i5 8400
23
RYZEN 5 3600
38
Energy efficiency
Energy consumption chip
Core i5 8400
44
Ryzen 5 3600
Core i5 8400
38
Ryzen 5 3600
51
Key differences
What are the main differences between 3600 and 8400
Reasons to choose Intel Core i5 8400
- There is an integrated graphics accelerator Intel UHD Graphics 630
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Has 23 MB more L3 cache
- More modern process technology — 7 vs 14 nanometers
- Unlocked multiplier
- New competitor1 1 year and 10 months later than standard1 902 PCI Express — 4.
0 - 21% faster in single core Geekbench v5 — 1252 and 1034 points
- 5% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.2 GHz vs 4 GHz)
- 6.08 GB/s (15%) higher maximum memory bandwidth
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i5 8400
1029
Ryzen 5 3600
+27%
1306
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i5 8400
5892
Ryzen 5 3600
+62%
9572
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i5 8400
2417
Ryzen 5 3600
+7%
2584
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i5 8400
9304
Ryzen 5 3600
+92%
17824
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i5 8400
1041
Ryzen 5 3600
+21%
1256
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i5 8400
4660
Ryzen 5 3600
+55%
7202
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
List of full technical specifications for Intel Core i5 8400 and AMD Ryzen 5 3600
General information
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Release date | October 5, 2017 | July 7, 2019 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Matisse |
| Model number | i5-8400 | — |
| Socket | LGA-1151 | AM4 |
| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | No |
Performance
| Cores | 6 | 6 |
| Number of threads | 6 | 12 |
| Frequency | 2. 8 GHz |
3.6 GHz |
| Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 28x | 36x |
| Tire speed | 8 GT/s | — |
| Level 1 cache | 64KB (per core) | 64KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 256KB (per core) | 512KB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 9MB (shared) | 32MB (shared) |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Power consumption
| Number of transistors | — | 3.8 billion |
| Process | 14 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W |
| Critical temperature | 100°C | 95°C |
| Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| GPU frequency | 350 MHz | — |
| Boost GPU frequency | 1050 MHz | — |
| Shader blocks | 192 | — |
| TMUs | 24 | — |
| ROPs | 3 | — |
| Computer units | 24 | — |
| TGP | 15W | — |
Max. resolution |
4096×2304 — 60Hz | — |
Igpu Flops
Core i5 8400
0.38 Teraflops
Ryzen 5 3600
N/D
Memory Support
| Memory type | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max. size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Number of channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 47.68 GB/s |
| ECC support | No | Yes |
Other
| Official site | Site Intel Core i5 8400 | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
| PCI Express version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Max. PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | — |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i5 8400
16 (24.
6%)
Ryzen 5 3600
49(75.4%)
Total votes: 65
Competitors
1.
Intel Core i5 8400 vs. Intel Core i5 12600K
2.
Intel Core i5 8400 vs. Intel Core i5 12400
3.
Intel Core i5 8400 vs. Intel Core i5 12400F
4.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs. AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
5.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs Apple M1
6.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs Intel Core i3 12100F
7.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs. AMD Ryzen 5 5500
8.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs. AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
9.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Intel Core i5 8400 vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i5 8400
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Which is better: Intel Core i5 8400 at 2.8 GHz (with Turbo Boost up to 4.0) or AMD Ryzen 5 2600 at 3.
4 GHz (with Turbo Core up to 3.9)? To find out, read our comparative testing of these 6-core desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single-threaded performance
Single-core benchmark rating
Core i5 8400
48
Ryzen 5 2600
47
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmark, where all nuclei
Core i5 8400
23
9000 Ryzen 5 2600
29 9000 29 9000
Chip Power Efficiency
Core i5 8400
44
Ryzen 5 2600
50
NanoReview Rating
Final Processor Score
Core i5 8400
38
Ryzen 5 2600
41
Key differences
What are the main differences between 2600 and 8400
Reasons to choose Intel Core i5 8400
- Supports up to 128 GB DDR4-2666
- Includes Intel UHD Graphics 630
- 3% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4 GHz vs 3.
9 GHz)
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Unlocked multiplier
- Has 7 MB more L3 cache
- Introduced 1 year later than the rival memory
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i5 8400
+1%
1029
Ryzen 5 2600
1019
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Core i5 8400
5892
Ryzen 90 5
+21%
7120
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i5 8400
+7%
2417
Ryzen 5 2600
2250
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i5 8400
9304
Ryzen 2 90
+42%
13251
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i5 8400
1041
Ryzen 5 2600
1043
Geekbench 5 (multi -core)
Core i5 8400
4660
Ryzen 5 2600
+22%
5667
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
List of full technical specifications for Intel Core i5 8400 and AMD Ryzen 5 2600
General
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Release date | October 5, 2017 | September 11, 2018 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Zen+ |
| Model number | i5-8400 | — |
| Socket | LGA-1151 | AM4 |
| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | No |
Performance
| Cores | 6 | 6 |
| Number of threads | 6 | 12 |
| Frequency | 2. 8 GHz |
3.4 GHz |
| Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 28x | 34x |
| Tire speed | 8 GT/s | — |
| Level 1 cache | 64KB (per core) | 96KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 256KB (per core) | 512KB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 9MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Power consumption
| Number of transistors | — | 4.8 billion |
| Process | 14 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W |
| Critical temperature | 100°C | 95°C |
| Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| GPU frequency | 350 MHz | — |
| Boost GPU frequency | 1050 MHz | — |
| Shader blocks | 192 | — |
| TMUs | 24 | — |
| ROPs | 3 | — |
| Computer units | 24 | — |
| TGP | 15W | — |
Max. resolution |
4096×2304 — 60Hz | — |
Igpu Flops
Core i5 8400
0.38 Teraflops
Ryzen 5 2600
N/D
Memory Support
| Memory type | Memory | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2933 |
| Max. size | 128 GB | 64 GB | |
| Number of channels | 2 | 2 | |
| Max. bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 43.71 GB/s | |
| ECC support | No | Yes |
Other
| Official site | Site Intel Core i5 8400 | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
| PCI Express version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Max. PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | — |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i5 8400
14 (25.
