CPU Performance: Real World Benchmarks
by Ian Cutresson May 11, 2014 3:01 AM EST
- Posted in
- CPUs
- Intel
- Haswell
- Z97
130 Comments
|
130 Comments
Intel Core i7-4790, i5-4690 and i3-4360 TestedThe Haswell Refresh ProcessorsCPU Performance: Real World BenchmarksCPU Performance: SYSMark and Scientific BenchmarksCPU Performance: Synthetic BenchmarksCPU Performance: Web BenchmarksIGP Benchmarks: GamingIGP Benchmarks: SyntheticdGPU Benchmarks: 1x MSI GTX770 LightningdGPU Benchmarks: 2x MSI GTX770 LightningdGPU Benchmarks: 1x ASUS HD7970dGPU Benchmarks: 2x ASUS HD7970Conclusions
2D to 3D Rendering –Agisoft PhotoScan v1.0: link
Agisoft Photoscan creates 3D models from 2D images, a process which is very computationally expensive. The algorithm is split into four distinct phases, and different phases of the model reconstruction require either fast memory, fast IPC, more cores, or even OpenCL compute devices to hand. Agisoft supplied us with a special version of the software to script the process, where we take 50 images of a stately home and convert it into a medium quality model. This benchmark typically takes around 15-20 minutes on a high end PC on the CPU alone, with GPUs reducing the time.
For Photoscan we see the incremental speedup with the i3 models, but the increased single thread speed of the i7 makes more of a difference.
Compression – WinRAR 5.0.1: link
Our WinRAR test from 2013 is updated to the latest version of WinRAR at the start of 2014. We compress a set of 2867 files across 320 folders totaling 1.52 GB in size – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30 second 720p videos.
For WinRAR, the increase in the threads makes the most difference here, moving from i5-4690 to i7-4675T.
Image Manipulation – FastStone Image Viewer 4.9: link
Similarly to WinRAR, the FastStone test us updated for 2014 to the latest version. FastStone is the program I use to perform quick or bulk actions on images, such as resizing, adjusting for color and cropping. In our test we take a series of 170 images in various sizes and formats and convert them all into 640×480 .gif files, maintaining the aspect ratio. FastStone does not use multithreading for this test, and thus single threaded performance is often the winner.
FastStone is all about the single thread speed.
Video Conversion – Xilisoft Video Converter 7: link
The XVC test I normally do is updated to the full version of the software, and this time a different test as well. Here we take two different videos: a double UHD (3840×4320) clip of 10 minutes and a 640×266 DVD rip of a 2h30 film and convert both to iPod suitable formats. The reasoning here is simple – when frames are small enough to fit into memory, the algorithm has more chance to apply work between threads and process the video quicker.
Results shown are in seconds and time taken to encode.
Small frames prefer more single thread MHz, whereas the dual 4K frame conversion prefers threads.
Video Conversion – Handbrake v0.9.9: link
Handbrake is a media conversion tool that was initially designed to help DVD ISOs and Video CDs into more common video formats. The principle today is still the same, primarily as an output for H.264 + AAC/MP3 audio within an MKV container. In our test we use the same videos as in the Xilisoft test, and results are given in frames per second.
With Handbrake it would seem that it prefers actual cores rather than hyperthreading, given by the i5 and i7 being relatively close and 2x the i3.
The Haswell Refresh Processors
CPU Performance: SYSMark and Scientific Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4790, i5-4690 and i3-4360 TestedThe Haswell Refresh ProcessorsCPU Performance: Real World BenchmarksCPU Performance: SYSMark and Scientific BenchmarksCPU Performance: Synthetic BenchmarksCPU Performance: Web BenchmarksIGP Benchmarks: GamingIGP Benchmarks: SyntheticdGPU Benchmarks: 1x MSI GTX770 LightningdGPU Benchmarks: 2x MSI GTX770 LightningdGPU Benchmarks: 1x ASUS HD7970dGPU Benchmarks: 2x ASUS HD7970Conclusions
Tweet
PRINT THIS ARTICLE
IGP Benchmarks: Synthetic — The Intel Haswell Refresh Review: Core i7-4790, i5-4690 and i3-4360 Tested
by Ian Cutresson May 11, 2014 3:01 AM EST
- Posted in
- CPUs
- Intel
- Haswell
- Z97
130 Comments
|
130 Comments
Intel Core i7-4790, i5-4690 and i3-4360 TestedThe Haswell Refresh ProcessorsCPU Performance: Real World BenchmarksCPU Performance: SYSMark and Scientific BenchmarksCPU Performance: Synthetic BenchmarksCPU Performance: Web BenchmarksIGP Benchmarks: GamingIGP Benchmarks: SyntheticdGPU Benchmarks: 1x MSI GTX770 LightningdGPU Benchmarks: 2x MSI GTX770 LightningdGPU Benchmarks: 1x ASUS HD7970dGPU Benchmarks: 2x ASUS HD7970Conclusions
OpenCL – CompuBench: link
CompuBench is an OpenCL and RenderScript benchmark designed by Kishonti for both CPUs and any GPGPU capable device.
While it offers almost two dozen tests, we select the more real-world tests in terms of fluid simulation and image analysis benchmarks and test on the CPU and IGP respectively. The CPU results are earlier in the review, and the IGP results are below.
CompuBench responds well to actual cores, but not so much to threads, given by the close scores of the i5 and i7 CPUs. AMD still wins here.
Unity – Graphic Scene 720p: link
As part of my IGP testing I went searching for a couple of new Unity based benchmarks to help decipher the line between the desktop graphics solutions and those that are not so great. First up is a graphical humdinger, implementing a complex scene with lighting effects (including fluid simulation, shadows, SSAO, Bloom). We run the benchmark at 720p with the highest graphical settings, reporting the average FPS.
The HD 4600 seems relatively CPU agnostic for complex graphics in Unity. More GPU power seems needed.
Unity – Draw Calls: link
Next up is a benchmark limited by draw calls rather than rendering complexity.
The scene generates simple Nintendo Gamecube polygons that fall due to gravity and bounce around until stationary. The scene continuously spews out these polygons until three consecutive frames fall under a 20 FPS average. We run the benchmark at 720p at simple graphic settings to minimize the graphical complexity, take the number of consoles that spawn from each run and average over several runs.
3DMark
The synthetic tools from Futuremark have been on the benchmarking landscape for over a decade, with each generation designed to tackle new problems as either the CPUs or GPUs become too powerful. Here we test 3DMark 06, 3DMark 11 (Performance) and the latest 3DMark.
For CPU limited testing, such as Cloud Gate, the Intel i7 pulls ahead with the i5 quickly in tow. For the others, AMD has the lead.
Tessmark
The latest version of TessMark is designed to focus on tessellation via OpenGL 4.
We run the latest version of the benchmark using the high resolution map set at maximum tessellation while 1080p full screen, reporting the average FPS.
IGP Benchmarks: Gaming
dGPU Benchmarks: 1x MSI GTX770 Lightning
Intel Core i7-4790, i5-4690 and i3-4360 TestedThe Haswell Refresh ProcessorsCPU Performance: Real World BenchmarksCPU Performance: SYSMark and Scientific BenchmarksCPU Performance: Synthetic BenchmarksCPU Performance: Web BenchmarksIGP Benchmarks: GamingIGP Benchmarks: SyntheticdGPU Benchmarks: 1x MSI GTX770 LightningdGPU Benchmarks: 2x MSI GTX770 LightningdGPU Benchmarks: 1x ASUS HD7970dGPU Benchmarks: 2x ASUS HD7970Conclusions
Tweet
PRINT THIS ARTICLE
Haswell GT1 Overview. Benchmarks and specs
Haswell GT1 graphics card (GPU) is at position 0 in our performance rating. Manufacturer: HASWELL. Running Haswell GT1 at minimum clock speed. The graphics chip is equipped with an acceleration system and can operate in turbo mode or during overclocking.
RAM size — GB with clock speed and bandwidth.
The power consumption of Haswell GT1 is , and the process technology is only 22 nm. Below you will find key compatibility, sizing, technology, and gaming performance test results. You can also leave comments if you have any questions. nine0003
Let’s take a closer look at the most important features of the Haswell GT1. To have an idea of which video card is better, we recommend using the comparison service.
3.3
From 4
Hitesti Grade
Popular video cards
Most viewed
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
Intel UHD Graphics 630
nine0002 Intel UHD Graphics 600
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Intel HD Graphics 530
Intel UHD Graphics 620
NVIDIA GeForce MX330
Intel HD Graphics 4600
Intel HD Graphics 520
Buy here:
Yandex Market
SberMegaMarket
AliExpress
General information
The base set of information will help you to know the release date of the Haswell GT1 graphics card and its purpose (laptops or PCs), as well as the price at the time of release and the average current cost.
This data also includes the architecture used by the manufacturer and the video processor code name.
| Performance Rating Position: | not rated | |||
| Architecture: | Generation 7.5 | |||
| Release date: | no data | |||
| GPU code name: | Haswell GT1 | |||
| Market segment: | Desktop | |||
Specifications
This is an important information that determines all the power specifications of the Haswell GT1 graphics card. The smaller the technological process of manufacturing a chip, the better (in modern realities). The clock frequency of the core is responsible for its speed (direct correlation), while signal processing is carried out by transistors (the more transistors, the faster the calculations are performed, for example, in cryptocurrency mining).
nine0003
| Process: | 22nm | |||
| Pipelines / CUDA cores: | 80 | |||
API support
All APIs supported by the Haswell GT1 graphics card are listed below. This is a minor factor that does not greatly affect the overall performance.
| DirectX: | 12 (11_1) | |||
| OpenGL: | 4.3 | |||
| Vulkan: | + | |||
| Shader Model: | 5.1 | |||
| OpenCL: | 1.2 | |||
Overall gaming performance
All tests are based on FPS. Let’s take a look at how Haswell GT1 ranked in the gaming performance test (the calculation is based on the recommendations of the game developer for system requirements; it may differ from real situations).
Select games
Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2.0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11.11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortniteStar Wars Battlefront 2Need for Speed PaybackCall of Duty WWIIAssassin´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2ELEXThe Evil Survival 2Middle-earth:8 Shadow of WarFIFA EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Mafia 3Deus Ex Mankind Divid edMirror’s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed UnityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineThiefX-Plane 10.
25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro: Last LightBioShock InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty: Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Border 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysi s — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — TimedemoHalo InfiniteFarming Simulator 22Battlefield 2042Forza Horizon 5Riders RepublicGuardians of the GalaxyBack 4 BloodDeathloopF1 2021Days GoneResident Evil VillageHitman 3Cyberpunk 2077Assassin´s Creed ValhallaDirt 5Watch Dogs LegionMafia Definitive EditionCyberpunk 2077 1.5 GRID LegendsDying Light 2Rainbow Six ExtractionGod of War
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
nine0138 1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Death Stranding (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
F1 2020 (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Gears Tactics (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Doom Eternal (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
| Description | |
| 5 | Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not been studied enough yet. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates. nine0048 |
| May Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates. | |
| 30 | Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphic settings, this game is expected to run at 25 fps or more |
| 40 | Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphics settings, this game is expected to run at 35fps or more |
| 60 | Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphics settings, this game is expected to run at 58fps or more |
| nine0264 May Run Fluently — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been sufficiently studied. | |
| ? | Uncertain — testing this video card in this game showed unexpected results. A slower card could deliver higher and more consistent frame rates while running the same reference scene. nine0048 |
| Uncertain — The performance of this video card in this game has not yet been studied enough. It is not possible to reliably interpolate data based on the performance of similar cards in the same category. | |
| The value in the fields reflects the average frame rate across the entire database. To get individual results, hover over a value. | |
Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to show smooth frame rates.
Haswell GT1 in benchmark results
Benchmarks help to determine the performance in standard Haswell GT1 tests. We have compiled a list of the most famous benchmarks in the world so that you can get accurate results for each of them (see description).
Pre-testing the graphics card is especially important when there are high loads, so that the user can see how the graphics processor copes with calculations and data processing.
Overall performance in benchmarks
3.3
From 4
Hitesti Grade
Share on social networks:
You need to log in to write a review.
Intel HD Graphics 510
NVIDIA T400
Intel UHD Graphics 610
Intel HD Graphics 610
A100 SXM4 40 GB
AMD Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
ATI Radeon HD 2600XT
AMD Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
AMD Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics
Intel Iris Graphics 6100
nine0003
Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) — an overview. Benchmarks and Specs
The Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) (GPU) is ranked 905 in our performance ranking. Manufacturer: Intel. Works with Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) with a minimum clock speed of 200 MHz. The graphics chip is equipped with an acceleration system and can operate in turbo mode or when overclocked at a frequency of 1000 MHz.
RAM size — GB with clock speed and bandwidth.
nine0002 The power consumption of Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) is , and the process technology is only 22 nm. Below you will find key compatibility, sizing, technology, and gaming performance test results. You can also leave comments if you have any questions.
Let’s take a closer look at the most important features of Intel HD Graphics (Haswell). To have an idea of which video card is better, we recommend using the comparison service. nine0003
5.0
From 3
Hitesti Grade
Popular video cards
Most viewed
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel UHD Graphics 600
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
nine0002 Intel HD Graphics 530
Intel UHD Graphics 620
NVIDIA GeForce MX330
Intel HD Graphics 4600
Intel HD Graphics 520
Buy here:
Yandex Market
SberMegaMarket
AliExpress
General information
A basic set of information will help you find out the release date of the Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) graphics card and its purpose (laptops or PCs), as well as the price at the time of release and the average current cost.
This data also includes the architecture used by the manufacturer and the video processor code name.
| Performance Rating Position: | 779 | |||
| Architecture: | ||||
| Code name: | Haswell GT1 | |||
| Type: | Laptop | |||
| Release date: | October 1, 2012 (9 years ago) | |||
| Current price: | $273 | |||
| Value for money: | 0.11 | |||
| GPU code name: | Haswell GT1 | |||
| Market segment: | Laptop | |||
Specifications
This is an important information that determines all the performance characteristics of the Intel HD Graphics (Haswell).
The smaller the technological process of manufacturing a chip, the better (in modern realities). The clock frequency of the core is responsible for its speed (direct correlation), while signal processing is carried out by transistors (the more transistors, the faster the calculations are performed, for example, in cryptocurrency mining). nine0003
| Conveyors: | 10 | |||
| Core Clock: | 200MHz | |||
| Acceleration: | 1000MHz | |||
| Process: | 22nm | |||
| Pipelines / CUDA cores: | 10 | |||
| Acceleration speed: | 1000MHz | |||
Memory (frequency and overclocking)
The internal memory is used to store data when performing calculations. Modern games and professional graphics applications place high demands on the amount and speed of memory.
The higher this parameter, the more powerful and faster the video card. Memory type, size and bandwidth for Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) + the ability to overclock in turbo mode. nine0003
| Memory bus width: | 64/128 Bit | |||
| Shared memory: | + | |||
API support
All APIs supported by the Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) graphics card are listed below. This is a minor factor that does not greatly affect the overall performance.
| DirectX: |
Overall gaming performance
All tests are based on FPS. Let’s take a look at where Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) ranks in the gaming performance test (the calculation is made in accordance with the recommendations of the game developer for system requirements; it may differ from real situations).
Select games
Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2.
0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11.11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortniteStar Wars Battlefront 2Need for Speed PaybackCall of Duty WWIIAssassin´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2ELEXThe Evil Survival 2Middle-earth:8 Shadow of WarFIFA EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Mafia 3Deus Ex Mankind Divid edMirror’s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed UnityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineThiefX-Plane 10.
25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro: Last LightBioShock InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty: Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Border 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysi s — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — TimedemoHalo InfiniteFarming Simulator 22Battlefield 2042Forza Horizon 5Riders RepublicGuardians of the GalaxyBack 4 BloodDeathloopF1 2021Days GoneResident Evil VillageHitman 3Cyberpunk 2077Assassin´s Creed ValhallaDirt 5Watch Dogs LegionMafia Definitive EditionCyberpunk 2077 1.5 GRID LegendsDying Light 2Rainbow Six ExtractionGod of War
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
nine0138 1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Death Stranding (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
F1 2020 (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Gears Tactics (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Doom Eternal (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
| Description | |
| 5 | Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not been studied enough yet. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates. nine0048 |
| May Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates. | |
| 30 | Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphic settings, this game is expected to run at 25 fps or more |
| 40 | Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphics settings, this game is expected to run at 35fps or more |
| 60 | Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphics settings, this game is expected to run at 58fps or more |
| nine0264 May Run Fluently — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been sufficiently studied. | |
| ? | Uncertain — testing this video card in this game showed unexpected results. A slower card could deliver higher and more consistent frame rates while running the same reference scene. nine0048 |
| Uncertain — The performance of this video card in this game has not yet been studied enough. It is not possible to reliably interpolate data based on the performance of similar cards in the same category. | |
| The value in the fields reflects the average frame rate across the entire database. To get individual results, hover over a value. | |
Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to show smooth frame rates.
Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) in benchmark results
Benchmarks help determine performance in standard tests of Intel HD Graphics (Haswell). We have compiled a list of the most famous benchmarks in the world so that you can get accurate results for each of them (see description).
Pre-testing the graphics card is especially important when there are high loads, so that the user can see how the graphics processor copes with calculations and data processing.
Overall performance in benchmarks
NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX
AMD Radeon HD 6230
Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570
Intel HD Graphics 405
3DMark Ice Storm GPU Benchmark: Graphic card performance test results. Check the 3DMark Ice Storm GPU GPU results at hitesti.com
AMD Radeon R5 M320
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)
Intel HD Graphics 510
NVIDIA GeForce 910M
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU Benchmark: Graphic card performance test results. Check out the 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU GPU test results at hitesti.com
AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)
AMD Radeon R4 (Beema)
Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)
Intel UHD Graphics 600
AMD Radeon HD 7520G
3DMark Fire Strike Score Benchmark: Graphic card performance test results.
Check out the 3DMark Fire Strike Score for GPUs at hitesti.com
AMD Radeon HD 7420G
AMD Radeon HD 8330
Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)
Intel HD Graphics 500
AMD Radeon HD 8280
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Benchmark: Graphic card performance test results. Check out the 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics GPU test results at hitesti.com
AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)
AMD Radeon HD 8330
AMD Radeon HD 7420G
3DMark 11 Performance GPU Benchmark: Graphics card performance test results. Check out the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU GPU test results at hitesti.com
AMD Radeon HD 8280
AMD Radeon HD 6520G
Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)
Intel HD Graphics 500
Intel HD Graphics 405
3DMark Vantage Performance Benchmark: Graphic card performance test results. Check out the 3DMark Vantage Performance GPU results at hitesti.
