Gtx 1979: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Specs

GeForce GTX 760 192-bit (OEM) | Specifications












This site requires Javascript in order to view all its content. Please enable Javascript in order to access all the functionality of this web site. Here are the instructions how to enable JavaScript in your web browser.



Note: The below specifications represent this GPU as incorporated into NVIDIA’s reference graphics card design. Graphics card specifications may vary by Add-in-card manufacturer. Please refer to the Add-in-card manufacturers’ website for actual shipping specifications.

GPU Engine Specs:

1152CUDA Cores

823Base Clock (MHz)

888Boost Clock (MHz)

79Texture Fill Rate (billion/sec)

Memory Specs:

5. 8 GbpsMemory Clock

1.5 GB/3 GBStandard Memory Config

GDDR5Memory Interface

192-bitMemory Interface Width

134Memory Bandwidth (GB/sec)

Feature Support:

GPU Boost, PhysX, TXAAImportant Technologies

3D Vision, CUDA, DirectX 11, SLI, Adaptive VSync, FXAAOther Supported Technologies
1

4.3OpenGL

PCI Express 3.0*Bus Support

YesCertified for Windows 7, Windows 8

Yes3D Vision Ready

Display Support:

4 displaysMulti Monitor

4096x2160Maximum Digital Resolution
2

2048x1536Maximum VGA Resolution

YesHDCP

YesHDMI 1. 4
3

One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortStandard Display Connectors

InternalAudio Input for HDMI

Standard Graphics Card Dimensions:

9.5 inchesLength

4.376 inches Height

Dual-slotWidth

Thermal and Power Specs:

97 CMaximum GPU Tempurature (in C)

130 WMaximum Graphics Card Power (W)

450 WMinimum System Power Requirement (W)
4

One 6-pinSupplementary Power Connectors

3D Vision Ready:

Yes 3D Blu-Ray

Yes3D Gaming

Yes3D Photos

*GeForce GTX 760 192-bit supports PCI Express 3. 0. The Intel X79/SNB-E PCI Express 2.0 platform is only currently supported up to 5GT/s (PCIE 2.0) bus speeds even though some motherboard manufacturers have enabled higher 8GT/s speeds.

1 — NVIDIA 3D Vision Surround require two or more graphics cards in NVIDIA SLI configuration, 3D Vision glasses and three matching 3D Vision-Ready displays. See 3D Surround for more information.

2 — 3840×2160 at 30Hz or 4096×2160 at 24Hz supported over HDMI. 4096×2160 (including 3840×2160) at 60Hz supported over Displayport. Support for 4k tiled MST displays requires 326.19 driver or later.

3 — Support for HDMI including GPU accelerated Blu-ray 3D support (Blu-ray 3D playback requires the purchase of a compatible software player from CyberLink, ArcSoft, Corel, or Sonic), x.v.Color, HDMI Deep Color, and 7.1 digital surround sound will be added in a Release 260 driver. Upgrade your GPU to full 3D capability with NVIDIA 3DTV Play software, enabling 3D gaming, picture viewing and 3D web video streaming. See www.nvidia.com/3dtv for more details.

4 — Not applicable to OEM sku — contact OEM for more information.

{{descTitle}}

{{desc}}


{{/supportedGPUsList}}




{{descTitle}}

{{desc}}




{{/supportedGPUsList}}

1979-1993 Ford Mustang Duraflex GTX Rear Bumper Cover 1 Piece (ed_100744)

(No reviews yet)

Write a Review

Duraflex
1979-1993 Ford Mustang Duraflex GTX Rear Bumper Cover 1 Piece (ed_100744)

Was:

$297.00

Now:

$201. 00

SKU:
ed_100744

Stock:
5

Availability:
In Stock

Location:
Fullerton CA

Material:
FRP

Category Type:
Exterior

Category Type:
Rear Bumpers or Lips

Product Overview

1979-1993 Ford Mustang Duraflex GTX Rear Bumper Cover — 1 Piece

Fits the following models: Fits All Models, Base Model, LX, GT

  • Hand laid, high quality 6 oz. fiberglass
  • Signature black finish
  • High quality weather resistant aluminum mesh grille (where applicable)
  • Proprietary polymer blend for maximum flexibility
  • Increased durability and longer service life
  • Modified Aerodynamics
  • Reduced damage rate up to 75%

New: A brand-new Duraflex 1979-1993 Ford Mustang Duraflex GTX Rear Bumper Cover 1 Piece, in its original packaging (where packaging is applicable). Packaging should be the same as what is found in our retail store. To be installed professionally by a bodyshop with a valid automotive repair business license. Fiberglass Duraflex parts always require prep work before they can be primed and painted. This product ed_100744 is made with fiberglass material, therefore it will exhibit chips, breaks, cracks, waves, scratches and holes which require modification. It is necessary to dry fit and drill mounting holes and preform body work before paint. Cutting and adding of fiberglass may be required for proper fitment. Duraflex direct from the manufacturer or a distributor. Primer finish. Hand layup is the manufacturing process used for the majority of our fiberglass parts. Hoods require hood pins. We do not offer any guarantee of fitment on vehicles that have been in involved in accidents and/or have body damage or customization, make sure to check with the installer. This product is designed for the Ford Mustang 1979-1993.

Reviews

(No reviews yet)

Write a Review

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

Comparative analysis of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.
nine0003

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

Benefits

Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti

  • Newer graphics card, approximately 1 year(s) 3 month(s4) difference in release dates

    • 901 More core frequency : 1800 MHz vs 1340 MHz

  • 64% more texturing speed: 28. 8 billion / sec vs 17.6 GTexel / s
  • 2x more shader processor(s): 192 vs 96
  • 2.7 times better floating point performance: 691.2 gflops vs 257.28 gflops
  • 2.9 times better performance in PassMark — G3D Mark benchmark: 1525 vs 534
  • Performance in PassMark — G2D benchmark Mark 5.7 times greater: 367 vs 64
  • Approximately 69% greater performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) benchmark: 3351 vs 1979
  • 2.4 times greater performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) benchmark (a) more: 3322 vs 1385
  • About 69% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) benchmark: 3351 vs 1979
  • 2.4x more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) benchmark: 3322 vs 1385
Production date 15 March 2011 vs 17 November 2009 Core clock 1800 MHz vs 1340 MHz

nine0049

Texturing speed 28. 8 billion / sec vs 17.6 GTexel / s Number of shaders 192 vs 96 Floating point performance 691.2 gflops vs 257.28 gflops PassMark — G3D Mark 1525 vs 534 PassMark — G2D Mark 367 vs 64 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3351 vs 1979 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3322 vs 1385

nine0049

GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3351 vs 1979 GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3322 vs 1385

Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

  • About 68% less power consumption: 69 Watt vs 116 Watt
  • 66% more memory frequency: 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz vs 1026 MHz
  • About 74% more performance in Geekbench — OpenCL benchmark: 9236 vs 5305
TDP 69 Watt vs 116 Watt
Memory frequency 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz vs 1026 MHz
Geekbench — OpenCL 9236 vs 5305

Benchmark comparison

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

nine0045

PassMark — G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
PassMark — G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
Geekbench — OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2

nine0046

GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) nine0042

GPU 1
GPU 2

nine0339

nine0045 322

Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
PassMark — G3D Mark 1525 534
PassMark — G2D Mark 367 64
Geekbench — OpenCL 5305 9236
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 18.461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 354.392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.125 nine0049

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 18.511
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 41.941
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2488
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3351 1979
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3322 1385
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2488
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3351 1979
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3322 1385
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score

Performance comparison

nine0049

nine0049

nine0045 105C C

nine0045 116 Watt

nine0045 Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI

nine0049

nine0339

nine0045

nine0339

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
Architecture Fermi 2. 0 Tesla 2.0
Codename GF116 GT215
Production date March 15, 2011 November 17, 2009
Price at first issue date $149 $80
Ranking 954 1280
Price now $287.59 $37.99
Type Desktop Desktop
Price/performance ratio (0-100) 7. 49 22.27
Core clock 1800 MHz 1340 MHz
Number of CUDA conveyors 192 96
Floating point performance 691.2 gflops 257.28 gflops
Process 40nm 40nm
Maximum temperature 100 °C
Number of shaders 192 96
Texturing speed 28. 8 billion/sec 17.6 GTexel/s
Power consumption (TDP) 69 Watt
Number of transistors 1,170 million 727 million
Audio input for HDMI Internal Internal
Video connectors DVIVGAHDMI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI
Maximum resolution VGA 2048×1536 2048×1536
Multi-monitor support
Tire 16x PCI-E 2. 0 PCI-E 2.0
Height 4.376″ (11.1 cm) 4.376″ (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 8.25″ (21 cm) 6.6″ (168mm) (16.8cm)
SLI support 2-way
Additional power connectors One 6-pin None
DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 10.1
OpenGL 4. 2 3.2
Maximum memory size 1GB 512MB or 1GB
Memory bandwidth 98.4 GB/s 54.4 GB/s
Memory bus width 192 bit 128 Bit
Memory frequency 1026 MHz 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
3D Vision
CUDA
DSR
SLI

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.
nine0003

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

Benefits

Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560

  • Newer graphics card, release date difference 1 year(s) 6 month(s)

    • texture times. more: 45.4 GTexel / s vs 17.6 GTexel / s

  • 3.5 times more Shader Processors: 336 vs 96
  • 4.2 times more floating point performance: 1,088.6 gflops vs 257.28 gflops
  • 2.4 times faster memory frequency: 4000 MHz vs 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz
  • 5.1 times faster performance in PassMark — G3D Mark benchmark: 2707 vs 534

    • 9001 about 85% faster in PassMark — G2D Mark benchmark: 417 vs 64

  • About 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) benchmark: 3667 vs 1979
  • GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex ( Frames) 2.4 times larger: 3332 vs 1385
  • About 85% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) benchmark: 3667 vs 1979
  • 2.4x more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) benchmark: 3332 vs 1385
Production date 17 May 2011 vs 17 November 2009 Texturing speed 45. 4 GTexel/s vs 17.6 GTexel/s Number of shaders 336 vs 96 Floating point performance 1,088.6 gflops vs 257.28 gflops Memory frequency 4000 MHz vs 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz PassMark — G3D Mark 2707 vs 534 PassMark — G2D Mark 417 vs 64 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3667 vs 1979 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3332 vs 1385 GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3667 vs 1979 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3332 vs 1385

Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

  • Core frequency about 65% higher: 1340 MHz vs 810 MHz
  • 2.2 times less power consumption: 69 Watt vs 150 Watt
  • About 14% more performance in the Geekbench — OpenCL benchmark: 9236 vs 8094
Core clock 1340 MHz vs 810 MHz
Power consumption (TDP) 69 Watt vs 150 Watt
Geekbench — OpenCL 9236 vs 8094

Benchmark comparison

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

nine0045

PassMark — G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
PassMark — G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
Geekbench — OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2

nine0046

GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) nine0042

GPU 1
GPU 2

nine0339

nine0045 0

Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
PassMark — G3D Mark 2707 534
PassMark — G2D Mark 417 64
Geekbench — OpenCL 8094 9236
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 25.82
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 623.187
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.201 nine0049

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 30.402
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 62.233
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3754
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3667 1979
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3332 1385
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3754
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3667 1979
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3332 1385
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score

Performance comparison

nine0049

nine0049

nine0045 727 million

nine0045 2048×1536

nine0045 4.376″ (11.1 cm)

nine0045 4.

On By alexxlab
2024 © All rights reserved
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
Architecture Fermi 2. 0 Tesla 2.0
Codename GF114 GT215
Production date 17 May 2011 November 17, 2009
Price at first issue date $199 $80
Place in the ranking 786 1280
Price now $353.59 $37.99
Type Desktop Desktop
Price/performance ratio (0-100) 10. 61 22.27
Core clock 810MHz 1340 MHz
Floating point performance 1,088.6 gflops 257.28 gflops
Process 40nm 40nm
Maximum temperature 99°C 105C C
Number of shaders 336 96
Texturing speed 45.4 GTexel/s 17.6 GTexel/s
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 69 Watt
Number of transistors 1,950 million
Number of CUDA conveyors 96
Audio input for HDMI Internal Internal
Video connectors Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI DVIVGAHDMI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum resolution VGA 2048×1536
Multi-monitor support
Tire 16x PCI-E 2. 0 PCI-E 2.0
Height 4.376″ (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 8.25″ (21 cm) 6.6″ (168mm) (16.8cm)
SLI 9 support0046

 2 Way
Additional power connectors Two 6-pin None
DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 10.1
OpenGL