AMD Ryzen 7 7700X Vs Intel Core i7-12700K: Which Should You Buy?
AMD has lifted the embargo on reviews for its Zen 4 Ryzen 7000 series desktop processors and in this Ryzen 7 7700X review we’ll be seeing just how fast it is in games and content creation. You can see my other article that reviews the flagship Ryzen 9 7950X here.
AMD’s Ryzen 7 7700X Zen 4 processor
Antony Leather
Pricing and specs
The Ryzen 7 7700X is slated to retail for $399, £419 and 499 Euros, which means it costs roughly the same or slightly more than the Core i7-12700K depending where you are in the world so today the fight is between those two processors.
As you can see above the Ryzen 7 7700X has eight cores and 16 threads and a peak boost frequency of 5.4GHz. During testing, this was achieved regularly, while in multi-threaded workloads, it would regularly sit at 5. 2GHz across all cores. It was also noticeably cooler-running than the Ryzen 9 7950X, usually sitting in the low 80’s under full load.
MORE FROMFORBES ADVISOR
Overclocking
Overclocking manually saw an all-core frequency of 5.4GHz, matching that peak boost and also adding 200MHz to the all-core boost frequency and with a voltage of 1.25V, the CPU actually ran slightly cooler as a result, usually seeing over 1.3V at stock speed under load. This is definitely an option in addition to other ways such as Precision Boost Overdrive or AMD’s Curve Optimizer.
Test system and benchmarks
The test system uses the latest drivers and Windows 11 updates that were up to date as of September 2022 and I’ve re-tested every CPU in the graphs too — I’d check every review out there to make sure they state the same as these things do make a big difference to the results. Default BIOS settings were used, but the correct memory settings applied using XMP or AMD EXPO profiles.
The hardware includes an Nvidia RTX 3070, custom water-cooling system featuring Corsair Hydro X components and a Barrow Ropilema test bench. I’ve also used G.Skill Trident Z Neo EXPO 6000MHz DDR5 memory for the AMD Ryzen 7000 system, Corsair 3466MHz Vengeance Pro RGB memory for the socket AM4 system and Kingston 6,000MHz Fury DDR5 memory for the Intel LGA1700 system along with an RM850x power supply. I used an Asus ROG Maximus Z690 Apex motherboard to test the 12th Gen Intel CPUs, and a Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master motherboard to test the AMD Ryzen 5000 CPUs and ASRock X670E Taichi to test the new Ryzen 7000 CPUs.
Benchmarks
Below we can see Cinebench R23 and the multi-threaded score was decent and a huge improvement over the Ryzen 5 7 5800X, but not enough to beat the Core i7-7700X, while falling short of the Ryzen 9 5900X.
Below, the single-threaded test was a different story as AMD has made up huge ground here, offering a huge amount more single-threaded performance compared to the Ryzen 7 5800X and also bettering the Core i7-12700K too.
Below is the combined Adobe Lightroom and Photoshop benchmark using UL’s Procyon test suite and here, the Ryzen 7 7700X excelled, offering far more performance than the Core i7-12700K and even more compared to the Ryzen 7 5800X, also beating the Core i9-12900K and Ryzen 9 5900X.
This is a real-world workflow benchmark designed by Puget Systems and here the Ryzen 7 7700X didn’t fare to well in a test that seems to like lots of cores and frequency, failing to get close to the Core i7-12700K, but offering significantly better performance than the Ryzen 7 5800X
Below is HandBrake and this is a score-based test using the Realbench benchmark where higher scores are better and equal lower encoding times. Here the Ryzen 7 7700X performed excellently, largely thanks to the benchmark not benefiting from large amounts of cores and instead relying on speed, which it clearly has in abundance. It was a huge amount faster than the Ryzen 7 5800X and critically than the Core i7-12700K too.
Below is the first game test and Watch Dogs: Legion saw nearly a 10fps gap between the slowest and fastest CPUs, despite a relatively modest RTX 3070 being used. The Ryzen 7 7700X took the top spot but wasn’t much faster than the Core i7-12700K, although it offered significant benefits over the Ryzen 7 5800X
Now with Far Cry 6 and it and the Core i7-12700K are essentially a match, with the Ryzen 7 7700X also matching the Ryzen 7 5800X. There was more of a difference last time I tested some CPUs in this game, which has seen an update, plus I’m now using newer drivers and Windows 11 updates which could explain it. Again, there are significant benefits over the Ryen 7 5800X, which had a minimum 99th percentile over 10fps slower.
The last game test is Forza Horizon 5 and at 1080p the Ryzen 7 7700X was again near the top of the graph, but only matching the Core i7-12700K. However, it was noticeably faster than the Ryzen 7 5800X and Ryzen 7 5800X3D.
Power consumption has definitely increased with AMD’s new platform and the Ryzrn 7 7700X draws about 40W more than its predecessor and 30W more than the Core i7-12700K under full load.
AMD’s Eco Mode allows you to drop the TDP of CPUs and with the Ryzen 7 7700X, dropping it from 105W to 65W saw the power draw for the system fall from 273W to just 203W with much lower temperatures too.
Using that 65W Eco mode didn’t see much performance drop either, with the Cinebench multi-threaded score falling from 20,030 to 19,207 — in my view that’s absolutely worth doing for the lower power draw and temperatures.
AMD’s Ryzen 7 7700X
AMD
Conclusions
The Ryzen 7 7700X is maybe less convincing against the competition than the Ryzen 9 7950X, but where it shines are in workloads that don’t benefit from lots of cores, but instead from raw performance. That includes Lightroom and Photoshop as well as games where it was either at the top or near it in the graphs.
It’s 65W Eco Mode stetting is also a fantastic feature if you want to cut power consumption and thermals with very little loss in performance and once the one-click option for this is enabled, it will be very easy to use.
As the Ryzen 7 7700X costs roughly same or a little more than the Core i7-12700K, it just about does enough to get a recommendation over it, but there are places, such as raw multi-threaded workloads, where the Intel CPU is quicker, so that recommendation isn’t unequivocal, and of course Intel has more CPUs in the pipeline.
Ryzen 7 7700X vs. Intel Core i7-12700K
Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?
By
Tyler Lacoma
Looking for a CPU upgrade for your gaming machine? We’ve got some good news: AMD’s Ryzen 7000 Zen 4 CPUs are set to deliver significant boosts in performance compared to the previous generation and long-awaited support upgrades for the latest connections.
Contents
- Specs
- Pricing and release date
- Performance
- Processor graphics
- Holding pattern
The Ryzen 7 7700X chip, in particular, looks like an excellent combination between a performance upgrade and affordability.
But that also sets it against the similarly priced Intel Core i7 12700K — a chip from the 12th-generation Alder Lake series Intel released in late 2021. Just how do these processors stack up, especially for gamers? Let’s take a look at what we know.
Specs
AMD
| Ryzen 7 7700X | Intel Core i7-12700K | |
| Architecture | Zen 4 | Alder Lake |
| Process | 5nm | 10nm |
| Cores/threads | 8/16 | 12 (8P + 4E)/16 |
| Base frequency | 4.5GHz | 3.60GHz |
| Boost frequency | 5.4GHz | 5.00GHz |
| L3 cache | 32MB | 25MB |
| Base power/TDP | 105W | 105W |
| Max boost power/TDP | 170W (approx) | 190W |
We’ll discuss more about these differences further down.
Keep in mind, these are AMD’s own numbers — we are still waiting on independent benchmarks, including our own tests, to verify that everything is accurate here. AMD’s statements should be confirmed by real-world numbers before we can absolutely guarantee these specs.
Also note that while the Intel chip has 12 cores, only eight of these are Performance cores, while the rest are Efficient cores. This was a change that Intel adopted for its 12th-gen chips: Performance cores are larger, faster, and optimized for single-thread performance. Efficient cores are smaller, optimized for multi-core performance, and designed to excel at background tasks. This hybrid approach is one reason that the Intel Core i7-12700K chip could offer credible competition for the Ryzen 7 7700X, especially when in heavily multi-threaded scenarios, despite being the older design.
That said, the Zen 4 architecture is newer, and the 7700X does run at higher clock speeds and has more L3 cache, so we’ll have to see what these chips can do in real-world testing before making any hard calls on performance.
Pricing and release date
The Intel Core i7-12700K released alongside the rest of the Alder Lake CPUs in the fall of 2021. Its recommended retail price is $410, but it typically sells for around $380 at the time of writing.
AMD’s Ryzen 7 7700X will be priced at $399 when it arrives on September 27. The question remains, however, whether this pricing will hold firm once Intel launches its Raptor Lake 13th-generation CPUs later this year. Considering the Ryzen 7000 is designed to compete with that as much as Alder Lake, AMD may price its chips more aggressively once details about Intel’s next-gen line are revealed.
AMD
Performance
The Ryzen 7 7700X with its new Zen 4 architecture includes eight cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i7 12700K offers 12 cores, supporting a total of 20 threads. That’s a big difference right off the bat, and it may seem like the Intel option has a clear upper hand when it comes to performance. However, additional physical cores aren’t the only important consideration.
The 7700X is built on the advanced TSMC 5nm process node, helping to make it a smaller, denser CPU design, about 50% of the size of the Intel Core i7-12700K’s 10nm Intel 7 manufacturing approach. The architecture is an improvement over previous-generation Zen 3 designs, making it more efficient and able to run at higher clock speeds. That should give the Zen 4 CPU a leg up in real-world performance over the older, lower-clocked Alder Lake design, despite the core count disparity.
Unfortunately, there aren’t any third-party benchmarks for any Ryzen 7000 CPUs so far, but there have been some leaked benchmarks. Those results suggest that on a single-threaded front, the 7700X is roughly equivalent to the 12700K, but that when it comes to multi-threaded performance, it’s notably quicker, offering the kind of performance only previously seen with the Core i9-12900K.
That’s only one benchmark, though, and we’ll need to see more before drawing any firm conclusions, particularly gaming benchmarks.
Wccftech
Processor graphics
Both the AMD Ryzen 7700X and the Intel Core i7-12700K have integrated graphics. That’s a big change from AMD’s typical CPU designs, which don’t offer onboard GPUs outside of its limited-run APU designs, like the 5600G and 5700G. The 7700X will have onboard graphics, but it won’t be as capable as AMD’s typical APUs. It’s even been said that it’s not designed for gaming, although it will likely be capable of something — the question is, what?
The Intel Core i7 12700K comes with its own Intel UHD Graphics 770 with a base frequency of 300MHz. It’s more than enough for esports and indie gaming, so it will be interesting to see if the AMD GPU can compete.
Holding pattern
The Ryzen 7700X is likely to be the fastest CPU in this head-to-head, but until we actually get our hands on it, we can’t know for sure. For now, on paper, it’s the better CPU, with greater feature support and more impressive specifications. The 12700K isn’t dead in the water, though.
It’s still a very powerful CPU for gaming and productivity work, and with price cuts ahead of the 13th-generation launch later this year, it could remain competitive for some time to come.
Editors’ Recommendations
-
AMD vs. Intel: which wins in 2023?
-
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X vs. Ryzen 9 7950X3D: 3D V-cache compared
-
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X vs. Ryzen 5 7600: is cheaper better?
-
Intel’s 24-core laptop CPU might outclass desktop i9 processors
-
Intel Core i5 vs. i7: Which CPU is right for you?
Which processor is better Intel Core i7 vs AMD Ryzen? (Choose the right processor for your desktop/laptop)
If you are a computer user who needs high performance, speed and many features from your processor, you need to make a very important decision between AMD Ryzen and Intel processors. Both brands have their own merits and features not to be missed.
But the debate between AMD Ryzen and Intel is very long and endless.
You can find numerous technical reviews and comparisons of these two types of processors on the Internet, but if you want to understand both from the point of view of a buyer who simply wants the best computer, then we have it for you. We have clearly laid out the difference between both brands so that everyone can understand it.
Message content: —
How to buy a suitable processor?
When choosing a processor for your computer, all you need to remember is its application. By application, you can determine the speed, flexibility, graphics, and also the price.
- Clock frequency: The clock frequency indicates how many processing cycles the processor performs per second.
- Colors: Number of physical CPU cores. More cores means more processing power.
- Instructions per second: How many millions of instructions can a processor process?
- Cache: Large CPU caches allow you to store frequently accessed information.
- Front bus: The front bus allows the CPU to communicate with the rest of your system and should run at a similar speed.
Which processor is better, Intel or AMD?
Intel has been in a strong position in the high-performance processor market for several years, while AMD is struggling to keep up. But that all changed in 2017 when AMD launched the Zen microarchitecture and its high-core Ryzen desktop processors with 8-core, 16-thread Ryzen 7 and 6-core, 12-thread Ryzen 5 processors. AMD processors have long focused on the packaging of CPU cores, giving a theoretical multithreading performance boost, while Intel focuses on high clock speeds and individual core efficiency.
AMD Ryzen
The AMD Ryzen chip comes in three different flavors — Ryzen 7, Ryzen 5 and Ryzen 3. The higher the number, the better and improved the chip is, it’s a fairly simple system.
Specifications
Each Ryzen chip is presented to compete with its main competitor, Intel.
For example, entry-level Ryzen 3 is up against Intel i3, mainstream Ryzen 5 is an alternative to Intel i5, and Ryzen 7 is launched against Intel i7. Later, in 2018, AMD Ryzen introduced the second wave of processor chips. The second wave is divided into four parts, which are developed using the 12nm process and Zen + architecture. The highlighted features of this series are high speed and low power consumption.
But soon AMD Ryzen stepped up and introduced its high-performance processor — Threadrippers. On the other hand, regular Ryzen chips offer a maximum of 8 cores and 16 threads. The Threadrippers series come with 12 cores and 24 threads, which is up to 32 cores and 64 threads. These additional AMD Ryzen series are compared to Intel Kaby and Coffee Lake processors.
If you like playing 3D rendered videos or high quality video games on your computer, then you should also spend a little extra money on a system with a powerful processor. High performance can offer you that edge in your video games that you’ve always been looking for.
So, AMD Ryzen currently has four different processors available in the market.
Intel
When we talk about Intel in a nutshell, we can simply say that the Intel i7 is better than the Intel i5, and likewise the Intel i5 is an improved version of the i3. The numbers here do not define the number of cores, clock speed or anything technical in the name, they are just a way to distinguish one version from another. So don’t get confused when looking for Intel processors.
Miscellaneous cores
Now we have the Intel i9 core which is introduced in 2017. This is a very powerful kernel that boasts a large number of threads and cores. Top Core i9The -7980X offers 18 cores (2.6GHz) and can handle 32 threads simultaneously, while the cheapest variant — the i9-7900X boasts 10 cores (capable of 20 threads) and a base clock of 3.3GHz .
These numbers look great, but if your requirements are not very technical and you don’t need to play videos with high rendering quality, then you don’t need to invest in expensive processors.
You can easily work with Intel i5 or i3 processors.
Compare Intel Core i3, i5, and i7 processors. Which one to buy?
Price
AMD chips are usually cheaper than their Intel counterparts. The latest Intel i9 7980 Extreme Edition processor is expected to be priced around $2,000, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is expected to be around $1,000.
Intel has the advantage of being incompatible with other hardware. But in AMD’s hardware chip design is more reasonable.
Both Intel and AMD have integrated video cards for some processors. These integrated cards are suitable for mid-range gaming, and this is where AMD has an advantage over Intel.
Intel processors have a low TDP rating compared to AMD. This means that it consumes less heat and therefore consumes less energy. This is because of the Hyper-Threading technology. AMD Ryzen has implemented simultaneous multithreading (SMT) in its 180W TDP rated processors, but still the 165W TDP rated Intel i9 7980XE outperforms AMD.
Because AMD has more cores in a single device, it can get hot, slowing down the performance of the processor.
Above, we have studied the main features and versions of Intel and AMD Ryzen processors available on the market. All processors have their good and bad qualities, so it’s hard to conclude which version will suit you best. You should compare the prices and specifications of all these different processors with each other and choose the processor that fits your list of requirements perfectly.
So which processor is better?
When it comes down to it, both take things in their own way. Single-core performance shows that the Intel i7-7700K performs better than the Ryzen 7 1800X, but in multi-core performance, the Ryzen 7 1800X outperforms the i7-7700K. For typical everyday use, consumers will be better off getting an Intel 7. th Processor generations like Core i7. If you’re a consumer who’s heavily into 3D rendering, video encoding, gaming, or heavy overclocking, then Ryzen is the way to go.
Assess your needs, then choose the processor that gives you the price-performance ratio you’re looking for.
Read Also:
- Complete Laptop Buying Guide 2019 — Specifications for a Good Laptop
- Which Graphics Card is Better AMD or NVIDIA? (Comparison of AMD and NVIDIA GPUs)
- Integrated or dedicated graphics card, which one to use and why?
- SSD vs HDD: Speed vs. Performance Comparison
- How to Optimize SSD (Solid State Drive) Performance in Windows 10
Intel Core i7 1065G7 vs. AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Performance Comparison
VS
Intel Core i7 1065G7
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
Which is better: 4-core Intel Core i7 1065G7 at 1.3 GHz or AMD Ryzen 7 4800H with 8 cores at 2.9GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these notebook processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single-threaded performance
Single-core benchmark rating
Core i7 1065g7
53
Ryzen 7 4800h
56
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks, where all nuclei
Core I7 1065G7
19000 9000
00050005 00050005 00050005000
Chip Power Efficiency
Core i7 1065G7
64
Ryzen 7 4800H
67
NanoReview Rating
Final Processor Score
Core i7 1065G7
41
Ryzen 7 4800H
53
Key differences
What are the main differences between 4800H and 1065G7
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
- Has 4 more physical cores
- More modern process technology — 7 vs.
10 nanometers - Appeared 5 months later than rival
- 3.9 GHz)
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i7 1065G7
1163
Ryzen 7 4800H
+8%
1254
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i7 1065G7
4479
Ryzen 7 4800H
+150%
11179
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i7 1065G7
2371
Ryzen 7 4800H
+11%
2642
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i7 1065G7
8492
Ryzen 7 4800H
+122%
18887
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i7 1065G7
1177
Ryzen 7 4800H
+3%
1207
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i7 1065G7
3974
Ryzen 7 4800H
+82%
7237
Add your Cinebench R23 results
Specifications
List of full technical specifications for Intel Core i7 1065G7 and AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
General information
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Release date | August 1, 2019 | January 6, 2020 |
| Type | For laptop | For laptop |
| Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Ice Lake | Zen 2 (Renoir) |
| Model number | i7-1065G7 | — |
| Integrated graphics | Iris Plus Graphics G7 | Radeon Vega 7 |
Processor
| cores | 4 | 8 |
| threads | 8 | 16 |
| Frequency | 1. 3 GHz |
2.9 GHz |
| Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 3.9 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
| Number of threads | 8 | 16 |
| Bus frequency | — | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 13x | 29x |
| Bus speed | 4 GT/s | — |
| Level 1 cache | 64KB (per core) | 64KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 256KB (per core) | 512KB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 8MB (shared) | 8MB (shared) |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| Process | 10 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Socket | BGA-1526 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15W | 35-54W |
| Critical temperature | 100°C | 105°C |
| Integrated graphics | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 | Radeon Vega 7 |
| GPU frequency | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost GPU frequency | 1100 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Shader blocks | 512 | 448 |
| TMUs | 64 | 28 |
| ROPs | 8 | 7 |
| TGP | 15W | 10-45W |
Max. resolution |
5120×3200 — 60Hz | — |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i7 1065G7
n/a
Ryzen 7 4800H
1.108 teraflops
Memory support
| Memory type | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733 | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4266 |
| Max. size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Number of channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. bandwidth | — | 68.27 GB/s |
| ECC support | No | Yes |
Other
| Official site | Site Intel Core i7 1065G7 | AMD Ryzen 7 4800H website |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Max. PCI Express lanes | — | 16 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4.
|