Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 benchmarks: good for 4K, great for high-fps 1440p
The GeForce GTX 1080 was the first Pascal generation Nvidia card to hit the market, offering a significant performance boost over the previous Maxwell era along with a host of new features and technologies. Today, it remains one of the stronger graphics cards for PC gaming at high resolutions, particularly 1440p and 4K, and also does well with high refresh rate monitors and VR.
However, the old GPU king does cost more than the GTX 1070 Ti — if you can find either card at retail this long after launch — and the GTX 1080 Ti, RTX 2080 and RTX 2080 Ti all offer more raw performance. The RTX 2070 is perhaps the GTX 1080’s closest contemporary competitor, given that the new Turing graphics card offers RTX and DLSS features and slightly better levels of performance — all for a lower price in many regions.
We’ll be looking at benchmark results from nine recent games in order to give you a good idea of what sort of performance you should expect when the GTX 1080 is paired with a suitable processor at very high or ultra graphical settings. We don’t tend to recommend anything faster than a GTX 1070 for 1080p gaming, as the CPU becomes the bottleneck and you’re leaving GPU performance on the table here. But if you are gaming at 1080p with a GTX 1080 on a high refresh rate display, we’d recommend you pair it with an Intel Core i7 8700K or better to get the highest frame-rates possible.
Which GPUs are worth buying? We’ve made our picks for the best graphics cards available, updated with the latest graphics cards as they’re released. As well as an overall performance champ, we name the best value graphics card and best cheap graphics card to guide your next upgrade.
For this benchmark roundup, we’ll compare the GTX 1080 to the new RTX 2070, RTX 2080 and the old GTX 1080 Ti; we’ll also throw in AMD’s top-end Vega 64 GPU. Towards the end of the page, we’ll also show you how the GTX 1080 compares to past generations of Nvidia cards and the entire Nvidia GeForce 10-series series, including the lower-end models, so you can get a better sense of the power on display here.
Our GTX 1080 benchmarks are based on the Founders Edition pictured here. Third party versions with meatier coolers are often equipped with factory overclocks, which can raise performance by around five to seven per cent.
| GPU cores | Boost clock | TFLOPS | Memory | Memory Bandwidth | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTX 1080 | 2560 | 1733MHz | 8.9 | 8GB | 320GB/s |
| GTX 1080 Ti | 3584 | 1582MHz | 11.3 | 11GB | 484GB/s |
| RTX 2070 | 2304 | 1620MHz | 7.5 | 8GB | 448GB/s |
| RTX 2080 | 2944 | 1710MHz | 10.1 | 8GB | 448GB/s |
| Vega 64 | 4096 | 1546MHz | 12.7 | 8GB | 484GB/s |
Each game benchmark uses our in-house system, comprised of a YouTube video with synchronised telemetry below.
Click on the video to start playback, and you can watch how each card handles the scene in real-time. You can add or remove different cards from the comparison, as well as change between 1440p and 4K resolutions to match your needs. (This is only available on the desktop version of Eurogamer at present; apologies to mobile users.)
For example, if you had a 4K monitor you could choose to only select the 4K results, whereas if you had the GTX 1080 already and were thinking about a monitor, you could see how performance differs between 1440p and 4K. As well as the live stats, there’s also a summary further down of how each card does on average throughout the scene.
As well as the average frame-rate, you can also mouse over different cards of the graph to see best and worst results — the best one per cent, the best five percent, the worst five per cent, the worst one per cent — which can be helpful to see how the cards handle the easiest or toughest parts of each scene. As well as seeing the frame-rates for each of these figures, you can also click on the barchart to swap between frame-rates and relative performance — and the latter may well prove more useful in comparing performance.
This benchmarking system is unique to Digital Foundry and offers as much or as little data as you want. For more information, you can see how the Digital Foundry benchmarking system works right here. Now that we’ve covered the preamble, let’s fire up some benchmarks!
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
We begin with Assassin’s Creed Odyssey, the most recent game to be built on Ubisoft’s AnvilNext 2.0 engine. The game’s wide vistas are challenging even at 1080p, with the GTX 1080 just scraping a 60fps average result — significantly ahead of the Vega 64, which struggles, but significantly behind the GTX 1080 Ti, RTX 2070 and RTX 2080. At 1440p, the GTX 1080 is 25 per cent behind the GTX 1080 Ti and 15 per cent behind the RTX 2070. The RTX 2080 is the fastest card in the field, with a nearly 30 per cent lead at the same resolution. At 4K, the GTX 1080 still manages a cinematic 30fps average with the Vega 64 close behind.
AC Odyssey: Ultra High, TAA
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
Assassin’s Creed Unity
Next up we have Assassin’s Creed Unity, a 2014 title that shows off the grandeur and chaos of Revolution-era Paris. The GTX 1080 is 15 per cent ahead of AMD’s best card, the Vega 64, at 1440p. However, the GTX 1080 Ti shows its dominance with a result that’s 19 per cent ahead of the GTX 1080 and 14 per cent ahead of the RTX 2070. At 4K, the GTX 1080 delivers 35fps, suggesting that a G-Sync display may be required for a suitably smooth experience. Also note the wide performance variance with AMD — Radeon hardware struggles whenever the game’s depth of field effect is rendered.
AC Unity: Ultra High, FXAA
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
Battlefield 1
Next up in our alphabetical tour of modern video games comes Battlefield 1 from 2016. The game lacks a built-in benchmark feature, so we’re using a tank driving scene that sports a small amount of close-range explosions that momentarily tank performance.
That means that the frame-time spikes can be safely disregarded, but it still gives us a good idea of the performance you can expect. The Vega 64 barely leads the GTX 1080 here, by around two per cent at 1440p and 4K. Regardless, the 61 frames per second that the GTX 1080 gets at 4K is totally playable and ties the performance of the RTX 2070. If you’re curious about Battlefield 5 results, expect to get about two-thirds of the frame-rate in the newer title, so around 40fps at 4K.
Battlefield 1: Ultra, TAA
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
Crysis 3
Crysis 3 from 2013 is our oldest benchmark, but far from our easiest. As we go through the train-bound benchmark at each resolution, the GTX 1080 leads the Vega 64 by around 13 per cent. However, only the GTX 1080 Ti and RTX 2080 are able to turn in a near-60fps result at 4K, with an average frame-rate of just 54fps. For a GPU capable of running Crysis flawlessly at ultra HD, you’ll need to turn to Nvidia’s flagship RTX 2080 Ti card which hits 68fps average.
Crysis 3: very high, SMAA T2X
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
Far Cry 5
Far Cry 5’s use of rapid-packed math (double-rate FP16) allows AMD hardware to perform better than usual, with the Vega 64 tying the GTX 1080 at 1080p and edging barely ahead at higher resolutions. In Nvidia land, the GTX 1080 is outperformed by the newer RTX 2070 at all resolutions, with the RTX 2080 taking the overall performance crown.
Far Cry 5: Ultra, TAA
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
Ghost Recon Wildlands
Now we’ve reached the most challenging (and most recent) section of our benchmark suite. Ghost Recon Wildlands offers an extreme workload at its ultra preset, and you can see even the GTX 1080 Ti barely manages to hit 60 frames per second at 1440p. The GTX 1080 sits 18 per cent behind the 1080 Ti at 1440p, but a few frames ahead of the Vega 64. At 4K, performance regresses to a console level at just 30 frames per second for the GTX 1080.
We recommend turning down some settings if you’re gaming at 4K, or investing in a G-Sync monitor to smooth out any frame-rate variation.
Ghost Recon Wildlands: Ultra, TAA
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Action hero Lara Croft continued her origin story in 2016 game Rise of the Tomb Raider, which includes a cool three-part integrated benchmark in its settings menu. We’re using the DX12 render path here and the game runs a little better on Nvidia hardware, with the GTX 1080 leading the Vega 64 by two per cent at 1440p and just one per cent at 4K. At almost 50 frames per second, the game is quite playable at 4K without sacrificing too many detail settings.
Rise of the Tomb Raider: Very High, SMAA
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
The GTX 1080 faces a harder task in 2018 follow-up Shadow of the Tomb Raider, barely managing to deliver 34 frames per second at 4K resolution.
That’s a little slower than AMD’s top graphics card and nearly 20 per cent behind the GTX 1080 Ti. The new RTX cards also impress here at 4K, with scores 10 per cent and 25 per cent faster than the GTX 1080.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Highest, TAA
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
The Witcher 3
Our penultimate test is 2015 title The Witcher 3, one of the most popular games of its time. The GTX 1080 leads the Vega 64 at 1080p, but the two cards are roughly equivalent at 4K — although the AMD card does exhibit some slowdown not experienced by its GeForce equivalent. The GTX 1080 Ti opens up a convincing 44 per cent lead over the GTX 1080 at 4K to win the group.
The Witcher 3: Ultra, Post-AA, No Hairworks
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
Wolfenstein 2: The New Colossus
Due to incompatibilities between this game and our video capture software, performance for the Vega 64 isn’t available on Wolfenstein.
However, that gives us the space to bring in the RTX 2060, which shows an interesting point of comparison with the GTX 1080 in this newer game. All measurements here are taken with the variable rating shading technology disabled and even without it, the RTX 2060 is faster than the GTX 1080 in all but 4K resolutions. VRS at its most aggressive setting provides 15 per cent of extra performance on the RTX 2060 too, which is pretty darn impressive.
Wolfenstein 2 Vulkan: Uber, TSSAA 8X
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
Cross-generational comparison
In this special benchmark, we’ve got the GTX 1080 stacked up against its historical predecessors, all the way back to the 700 series which debuted in 2013. It’s worth noting that we’ve replaced the usual resolution controls to the right of the video with generational controls, allowing you to compare within or between the Pascal, Maxwell and Kepler cards included here.
Assassin’s Creed Unity: 1080p, Ultra High, FXAA
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
Generational comparison
We’ll conclude with a comparison of the entire Nvidia Pascal lineup, where the GTX 1080 is closer in performance to the GTX 1070 Ti than the GTX 1080 Ti.
Assassin’s Creed Unity: 1080p, Ultra High, FXAA
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
With that, we’ve completed our tour of the GTX 1080’s benchmark results. We hope you’ve found this article helpful!
In the meantime, why not check out our full review of the GTX 1080.
Now that you’ve seen the benchmarks for one card, why not check out see which PC hardware we recommend to our friends and family? Here are the DF picks for the overall best graphics cards and for the best gaming monitors on the market.
2017’s Best GPU in 2021: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Revisit
Today we’re taking a fresh look at the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, because every time we do one of these GPU revisits, we get dozens of requests to check out the 1080 Ti, so here you go.
Thankfully, I really enjoy looking at these previous generation GPUs, running them through a few dozen games to see how they’re holding up.
As a quick refresher, Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1080 Ti was released back in early 2017 for $700 (see our original review), which at the time was considered an enormous amount of money for a gaming graphics card. Oh, how times have changed.
Despite the price tag though, the 1080 Ti still offered gamers impressive value, packing unrivaled performance and a fat 11GB VRAM buffer.
If we take a look at our most recent benchmark data used across our GPU reviews, including the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, RTX 3080 Ti and Radeon 6600 XT, we see that the GTX 1080 Ti remains a capable gaming graphics card at 1440p, delivering 93 fps on average across the 12 games used for day one reviews.
That’s 6% faster than the Radeon 5700 XT, but 18% slower than the 6700 XT. Then, when compared to current generation of so-called $700 parts, which would include the RTX 3080 and 6800 XT, the 1080 Ti is over 60% slower, but that’s to be expected four years later.
That data was recorded using our Ryzen 9 5950X test system with 32GB of DDR4-3200 CL14 dual-rank, dual-channel memory. For this revisit we’ll be using the same test system, but covering 31 games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K.
This is a follow up from the Radeon RX 5600 XT, 5700 XT and RTX 2060 Super testing that we recently posted.
We’ll be using those GPUs for comparison and while it would have been nice to include a few more relevant parts such as the RTX 2070 Super and RTX 3080, for sake of time efficiency (it takes at least a few days to add a single GPU to this 31 game benchmark), we’re posting these now with more to be added over the coming weeks.
Benchmarks
Let’s now take a look at how these four GPUs compare in a dozen games before we check out the average gaming performance across all 31 tested titles, along with a few head to head comparisons.
We’ll start with Biomutant which tends to favor GeForce GPUs. The game uses Unreal Engine 4 and it appears as though little optimization has been made for Radeons, as a result the 2060 Super and 5700 XT are comparable here and that means at 1440p the GTX 1080 Ti was a massive 28% faster, offering an entirely different tier of performance.
Whereas the 2060 Super and 5700 XT at times dipped below 60 fps, the 1080 Ti was good for well over 60 fps throughout our testing, so a great result for the old GeForce flagship.
In Red Dead Redemption 2, the 5700 XT performed a lot better, matching the GTX 1080 Ti at all resolutions. Using the slightly dialed down ‘high’ settings the 1080 Ti struggled to deliver 60 fps at 1440p, and therefore is better suited to 1080p using these quality settings.
The GTX 1080 Ti was able to flex its muscle in Hitman 2, pumping out 98 fps at 1440p, making it 23% faster than the 5700 XT, and 27% faster than the 2060 Super. Similar margins were also seen at 1080p and 4K.
Resident Evil Village is a 2021 release and here the 5700 XT does get the better of the GTX 1080 Ti, delivering 7-8% greater performance at 1080p and 1440p. That said, the 1080 Ti was still very impressive, rendering over 80 fps at all times when testing at 1440p.
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order is another Unreal Engine 4 title, though the Radeon GPUs do slightly better when compared to what we saw with Biomutant.
Even so the GTX 1080 Ti was 6% faster than the 5700 XT and a massive 21% faster at 1440p.
Days Gone also favors the GTX 1080 Ti and this is yet another Unreal Engine 4 title. Although the 5700 XT and GTX 1080 Ti were comparable at 1080p, the GeForce GPU runs away with it at 1440p, pulling ahead by a 15% margin with over 70 fps at all times in our testing.
Next up we have Cyberpunk 2077, and please note we’ve updated our benchmark pass for this title, moving from a densely NPC populated area. Here these GPUs really struggled at 1440p and certainly weren’t able to deliver a 60 fps experience, for that you’ll need to drop down to 1080p, and please note we’re not using the maxed out graphics either. Interestingly, the GTX 1080 Ti was slower than both the 2060 Super and 5700 XT, losing to the Radeon GPU by a 13% margin.
Moving on to Flight Simulator 2020, we’ve updated all our results for this title after a new patch improved performance across the board.
The game’s still not silky smooth on older hardware using the ultra quality preset, but we did see a big 30%+ improvement for all GPUs.
This allowed the 5600 XT to deliver playable performance at 1080p and now the 5700 XT is very smooth with 51 fps. That said, the GTX 1080 Ti was faster averaging 56 fps at 1080p, which is plenty for this simulator.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider is one of the older titles we’re testing with, but it’s still very demanding and looks quite good. The GTX 1080 Ti spat out 90 fps at 1440p, while the 5700 XT was good for 80 fps, making the GeForce GPU 13% faster.
F1 2021 is the newest game in this benchmark, and although it supports ray tracing and enables it by default on GPUs that support it, we’ve gone and disabled it on the RTX 2060 Super as it’s the only RT enabled GPU here and rather than place it at a disadvantage we’ve simply disabled it for an apples to apples comparison.
The 5700 XT was 25% faster than the RTX 2060 Super at 1440p, and despite that huge margin, the GTX 1080 Ti was 6% faster than the 5700 XT.
So a strong result for the Pascal GPU.
Unsurprisingly the GTX 1080 Ti powers through Rainbow Six Siege, delivering 193 fps on average at 1440p to match the 5700 XT, it’s even capable of pushing up around 100 fps at 4K.
Finally, let’s take a look at Assassin’s Creed Valhalla which uses the AnvilNext 2.0 game engine and is well optimized for Radeon GPUs. The 5700 XT had no issue brushing aside the 1080 Ti, at least when looking at the 1080p and 1440p results where it was 14% and 11% faster respectively.
31 Game Average Performance
Here’s a look at the average performance seen across the 31 games tested. The GTX 1080 Ti remains 6% faster than the 5700 XT at 1440p, which is the same margin seen in our smaller 12-game sample used for day-one reviews.
That means the GTX 1080 Ti is ~20% faster than the 2060 Super and with 100 fps on average, it’s still a very competent 1440p gamer for the most part.
For those of you interested in how the 5700 XT and GTX 1080 Ti compare head-to-head in the games tested, well here’s a look at just that.
The GeForce GPU is pushed ahead by massive wins in half a dozen of the games tested, those games include Valorant, PUBG, Biomutant, Hitman 2, Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order and Resident Evil 3.
Of those games, four use Unreal Engine 4 which isn’t a surprise, and while it’s possible for Radeon GPUs to perform quite well in UE games — take Borderlands 3 for example — it seems the developer really has to go out of their way to optimize for AMD hardware when using this popular engine, which continues to be a problem for Team Red.
If we look at the games where the 5700 XT does well and manages to beat the GTX 1080 Ti, you won’t find any Unreal Engine 4 titles. Forza Horizon 4 uses the Forzatech engine, Assassin’s Creed Valhalla uses the AnvilNext 2.0, Resident Evil Village the RE Engine, Cyberpunk 2077 REDengine 4, Doom Eternal id Tech 7, and Dota 2 the Source 2 engine.
What We Learned
In late 2021, the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is hanging in really well. The GPU has aged well partly thanks to its large 11GB frame buffer, and will continue to be able to take advantage of HD texture packs for some time to come.
Talks about Nvidia abandoning older architectures and not optimizing newer games, at least for now that certainly hasn’t been the case with Pascal, as the level of optimization for modern titles looks great.
The only issue with the GTX 1080 Ti today is the same issue faced by all GPUs: price and availability. The average selling price we’ve seen for the 1080 Ti over the past few months is around $600, which is just $100 less than the MSRP 4 years ago.
Basically you’re looking at GeForce RTX 2070 money with the 2070 Super typically selling for around $50 more, though it’s well worth that small premium given you pick up some really cool features such as DLSS.
That being the case, the GTX 1080 Ti makes no sense in 2021 to buy used. It’s certainly miles better for gamers than the 5700 XT which is selling for ~$800, probably because that GPU is better for mining, so if you happen to have one, you will want to sell it and upgrade to a faster gaming card like the 6700 XT.
The GTX 1080 Ti has been an interesting GPU to track over the years, especially on the second hand market. Even during times when the market was flooded with discounted 5700 XT’s and readily available 2070 Super’s, the GTX 1080 Ti held its value well, never dipping below ~$400 at places like eBay.
For now we can only dream of $350 GTX 1080 Ti’s, but if and when the market returns to more normal conditions, you can expect the flagship Pascal GPU to tumble in price on the second hand market.
For now the 6600 XT looks like your best shot at achieving GTX 1080 Ti-like performance, though pricing and availability still looks messy depending on where you live. In the US, you can pick one up on eBay for a little over $600. While in Australia we’ve been able to buy an RX 6600 XT graphics card for around $700 AUD, while GTX 1080 Ti typically sells for well over $800 AUD.
So as much as we disliked the 6600 XT in our day-one review, it’s turning out to be the better available option for those seeking this level of gaming performance.
Shopping Shortcuts:
- Radeon RX 6600 XT on Amazon
- GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on Amazon
- Radeon RX 6800 on Amazon
- GeForce RTX 3070 Ti on Amazon
- GeForce RTX 3080 on Amazon
- AMD Ryzen 9 5950X on Amazon
GeForce GTX 1080, although not new, is still very powerful — Forza Horizon 5 pulls even in 8K
Top
07/10/2022
Author: Sergey Kalashnikov
1 star2 stars3 stars4 stars5 stars
GeForce GTX 1080, though not new, is still very powerful — Forza Horizon 5 pulls even in 8K0003
2
5
1
5
YouTuber zWORMz Gaming posted a video demonstrating what the GeForce GTX 1080 can do in Forza Horizon 5.
Tested on a PC with an AMD Ryzen 9 processor5900X and 32 GB of RAM. Youtuber chose a non-reference GeForce GTX 1080 from ASUS.
Results below.
- Forza Horizon at 1080p at maximum graphics settings: 86 fps.
- Forza Horizon in 2K at maximum graphics settings: 69 fps.
- Forza Horizon in 4K at maximum graphics settings: 47 fps.
- Forza Horizon in 8K at maximum graphics settings: 13 fps.
- Forza Horizon at 1080p at high graphics settings: 136 fps.
- Forza Horizon in 2K at high graphics settings: 99 fps.
- Forza Horizon 4K High Settings: 70 fps.
- Forza Horizon in 8K at high graphics settings: 24 fps.
- Forza Horizon in 8K at medium graphics settings: 29 fps.
Conclusion: GeForce GTX 1080 is still very good for modern games. If you have one, there is no point in changing it.
🔹 Yandex.Zen🔹 Vkontakte🔹 Telegram🔹 Pulse Mail.ru
Buy? It is quite possible.
Worth reading:
- The Witcher 3 in 8K and with tons of mods looks better than reality itself.
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600 compared to Ryzen 5 5600 in modern games — is there a big difference?
- MSI has released the ultimate laptop for gamers Titan GT77 12UX — top-end Intel Core i9-12900HX processor and GeForce RTX 3080 Ti graphics card.
Source: YouTube
Author
Sergei Kalashnikov
Was the article interesting?
Share link
By clicking on the «Subscribe» button,
you consent to the processing of personal data
Recommended
Advertising on CHIP
Contacts
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti: What is the difference?
69 points
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
52 points
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Winter with
VS
56 facts compared to
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX03
why AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is better ?
- 12.
44 TFLOPS higher than FLOPS?
23.04 TFLOPS vs 10.6 TFLOPS - 157.8 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
288 GPixel/s vs 130.2 GPixel/s - 624MHz faster memory speed?
2000MHz vs 1376MHz - 4992MHz higher effective clock speed?
16000MHz vs 11008MHz - 45.45% more VRAM?
16GB vs 11GB - 388 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels? more memory bandwidth?
512GB/s vs 484GB/s - Supports ray tracing?
Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti better than AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT?
- 80W below TDP?
220W vs 300W - 96bit wider memory bus?
352bit vs 256bit - 1 more DisplayPort outputs?
3 vs 2 - Has DPFP?
- 8.8mm lower?
111.2mm vs 120mm
What are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
vs
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
VS
AMD Radeon RX 6800
NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 1080 TI
VS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 200009
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTA VS VS VS VS VS VS VS0003
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
vs
Gigabyte Radeon RX 6950 XT Gaming OC
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
VS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
VS
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 TI
VS
NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 1660003
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia Tesla T4
Price Match
User Reviews
Overall Rating
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
1 User Reviews
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
8.
0 /10
1 reviews of users
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 TI
1 Reviews of users
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 TI
10.0 /10
References
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 /10
1 Votes
9.0 /10
1 Votes
Games
10.0 /10
1 Votes
/10 9 9
1 votes
performance
10.0 /10
1 Votes
10.0 /10
1 Votes
Strealizing the work
8.0 /10
9000 10
1 Votes
Reliability
8.0 /10
1 Votes
10.0 /10
1 Votes
Productivity
1. TACT FMIC0003
1529MHz
1480MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
2.
turbo GPU
2250MHz
1582MHz
When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
3.pixel rate
288 GPixel/s
130.2 GPixel/s
The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
4.flops
23.04 TFLOPS
10.6 TFLOPS
FLOPS is a measurement of GPU processing power.
5.texture size
720 GTexels/s
332 GTexels/s
Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
6.GPU memory speed
2000MHz
1376MHz
Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.
7.shading patterns
Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a graphics card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.
8.textured units (TMUs)
TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
9 ROPs imaging units
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
1.memory effective speed
16000MHz
11008MHz
The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.
2.max memory bandwidth
512GB/s
484GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3.
VRAM
VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.
4.memory bus width
256bit
352bit
Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.
5. GDDR memory versions
Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.
6. Supports memory troubleshooting code
✖AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Memory troubleshooting code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
Functions
1.
DirectX version
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
2nd version of OpenGL
The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.
OpenCL version 3.
Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
4. Supports multi-monitor technology
✔AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.
5. GPU temperature at boot
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti)
Lower boot temperature — this means that the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.
6.supports ray tracing
✔AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.
7.Supports 3D
✔AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).
8.supports DLSS
✖AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.
9. PassMark result (G3D)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT)
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti)
This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.
Ports
1.has HDMI output
✔AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.
2.HDMI connectors
More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.
HDMI 3.Version
HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.0
New HDMI versions support higher bandwidth for higher resolutions and frame rates.
4. DisplayPort outputs
Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.
5.DVI outputs
Allows connection to a display using DVI.
Mini DisplayPort 6.
