Ryzen 3 2200g gaming: Ryzen 3 2200G is great for extreme budget gaming and HTPC use

Ryzen 3 2200G is great for extreme budget gaming and HTPC use

Our Verdict

The Ryzen 3 2200G is the new darling of anyone looking to build a modest gaming PC or HTPC on a tight budget. It can do everything you need, provided your demands aren’t too high.

For

• Great price for a modest CPU and GPU combo
• A low-power HTPC foundation
• Capable of modest (GPU) overclocking

Against

• Still struggles in more demanding games
• Built-in GPU needs good RAM for best results
• Not a great option for CPU intensive tasks

Why you can trust PC Gamer
Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Today’s best Ryzen 3 2200G deals

46 Amazon customer reviews

☆☆☆☆☆

£102. 95

View

£121.49

View

£136.37

View

Show More Deals

Sometimes the best products aren’t the most cutting-edge parts, or even the fastest parts. The best computer processor for example is the one that fits your needs, at a price you can afford. AMD has frequently been the darling of budget PC builders, and while it often requires sacrificing some performance, for the price it’s tough to complain. Last year’s Ryzen 3 1200 and 1300X were reasonably priced, and ultimately forced Intel to come out with the Core i3-8100—a major upgrade in CPU performance relative to the previous generation i3-7100. The one potential drawback with the Ryzen 3 CPUs was that they required a dedicated graphics card. AMD finally addresses that shortcoming with its Ryzen 3 2200G APU, and it even comes in at a slightly lower price than the outgoing parts.

Test System Hardware

AMD AM4 APU Testbed
MSI B350I Pro AC
16GB G.Skill Flare X DDR4-3200 CL14
16GB G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-2400 CL15
Samsung 960 Evo 500GB
Enermax Steelwing
Enermax Revolution SFX 650W

AMD AM4 CPU Testbed
Gigabyte Aorus X370 Gaming 5
16GB GeIL Evo X DDR4-3200 CL16
Samsung 960 Evo 500GB
Enermax Ostrog Lite
Enermax Platimax 750W
Enermax LiqMax II 240

Intel LGA1151 Testbeds
Gigabyte Aorus Z370 Gaming 7
MSI Z270 Gaming M7
16GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 CL14
Samsung 960 Evo 500GB
Corsair Carbide Air 740
Corsair HX750i 750W
Corsair h215i

I reviewed the Ryzen 5 2400G earlier this week, and I included results for the Ryzen 3 2200G as well. My biggest complaint with the 2400G is that it ends up being priced a bit too high to really hit the sweet spot I was hoping for. It’s a bit slower on the CPU side than a Core i3-8100, and the graphics are a bit slower than a GT 1030 (give or take depending on the game). Combined with the need for higher performance DDR4 memory to reach its full potential, I don’t think it’s the budget APU most users will want. The Ryzen 3 2200G has no such problems, however, with a price of only $100 and performance that’s more than acceptable for light gaming and other workloads.

• We’re curating all the best Black Friday PC gaming deals right here

I covered the main design aspects of the Ryzen APUs in the 2400G article, so I’m mostly going to focus on the performance and value proposition of the 2200G here. The stock specs include a 3.5 to 3.7GHz 4-core/4-thread CPU (losing the SMT functionality), 4MB of L3 cache, and integrated Vega 8 graphics—that’s eight CUs, or 512 streaming processors. It ends up a bit slower than the 2400G across nearly all tests, but then it also costs about a third less. That’s a great tradeoff for an extreme budget build.

As with the other Ryzen processors, the Ryzen 3 2200G comes fully unlocked, for both the CPU and GPU. I haven’t had a chance to fully push the GPU yet, but initial results suggest that with faster RAM and a 20-25 percent overclock, it can basically match the stock performance of the 2400G’s Vega 11 solution. On the CPU, I hit a stable 3.9GHz, which is also the same limit I hit with the 2400G—going any further would require a better cooler than the stock AMD Spire, and that’s not something I’d recommend putting money into for a budget PC.

The other CPUs were tested with the hardware shown in the box on the right. Everything used DDR4-3200 CL14 memory, though I did test the 2400G with a more affordable DDR4-2400 CL15 kit to see how that impacts performance. While it doesn’t change the CPU performance much, it causes about a 15-20 percent drop in gaming performance, and that should also be true of the 2200G when paired with budget RAM. You’ll definitely want to spend a bit more to get faster DDR4 if possible (eg, this kit of Patriot CL16 DDR4-3200 only costs $10 more than the DDR4-2400 kit I used for testing). Of course, given current RAM prices, 16GB is almost certainly overkill—8GB is far more practical, and I’ll give a sample build near the end of the article to show what can be done.

I’ve left the extreme Core i9 and Threadripper processors out of the charts, and the Core i7 and Ryzen 7 are also in a different league. The 2200G is a budget processor, priced to move, and it delivers the goods. Combined with a mini-ITX or micro-ATX motherboard, you can build a complete PC for about the same price as a Core i7-8700K (especially once you add in a CPU cooler). On the graphics side, I’ve included the GTX 1050, GTX 1050 Ti, RX 560, and Intel’s HD 630—I’ll see about running some additional tests on AMD’s previous generation A10-7870K in the near future, but didn’t have time for this initial review. It’s no surprise that all the dedicated GPUs I’ve tested are faster, since they also cost more than the 2200G (especially at the currently inflated GPU prices).

Ryzen 3 2200G gaming performance

Image 1 of 12

On the gaming side of things, the 2200G with high-end RAM is slightly faster than a 2400G with budget RAM. Again, definitely don’t go with the cheapest RAM you can find if you’re hoping to get the most of the integrated GPU. The 2200G is also more than twice as fast as Intel’s latest HD Graphics 630. Neither solution is going to handle the latest games at higher quality settings and 1080p or higher resolutions, but I did some additional 1080p low testing and the 2200G gets above 30fps in the majority of games. Lighter fare is even better, so CS:GO for example easily runs at more than 60fps average (though periodic stutters and dips below 30fps are still present for some reason).

The difficulty with integrated graphics isn’t something that’s going to go away in the immediate future, at least not without increasing the cost. The chief problem is the need to share both power and memory bandwidth with the CPU. While it’s theoretically possible to have an APU with two or three times the GPU cores as the 2200G (Ryzen 7 2700G with Vega 24, anyone?), graphics processing tends to be extremely bandwidth hungry. Dual-channel DDR4-3200 can manage about 64GB/s, a chunk of which goes to the CPU, whereas even a modest GTX 1050 has about twice that much dedicated bandwidth.

Intel’s upcoming Kaby Lake-G with Vega M graphics is certainly one way of doing things, with a 4GB HBM2 stack on the package, but the cost for those chips is likely going to be over three times the price of the 2200G. Long-term, as process technology continues to shrink and we get even more transistors to work with, we’ll probably on-die or on-package memory, and prices for such things will eventually come down. But until then, APUs like the 2200G will work best as entry-level gaming solutions—or as something for HTPC use, where the low power use and high integration are great to have.

Ryzen 3 2200G application performance

Image 1 of 10

In non-gaming tasks, there’s not much to say that I haven’t already said. Performance is equal (and even slightly ahead of) the Ryzen 3 1300X, and a larger jump relative to the Ryzen 3 1200. If you have one of those already with a dedicated graphics card, no problem, but going forward there’s very little reason to even think of the CPU-only Ryzen 3 parts. Unless prices drop below that of the 2200G, I suppose. The change from a dual-CCX (CPU Complex) layout with up to eight cores, to a native four-core solution with Vega graphics, is far more sensible in the budget market.

If you’re wondering where the Intel competition sits, the previous generation i5-7600K is similar to the new i3-8100 (both are 4-core/4-thread designs), except the 7600K runs at up to 4.2GHz stock and can be overclocked. Knock off about 10-15 percent from the 7600K results in the above charts and you’d have the i3-8100. In other words, Intel’s latest generation 4-core parts are a bit faster than the 2200G, but then the 2200G still has the advantage in graphics performance.

Ryzen 2200G Extreme Budget PC

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

£102. 95

View

See all prices

DDR4-3200 8GB (2x4GB)

£47.96

View

See all prices

Cooler Master Elite 130

£69.99

View

See all prices

Corsair CX550M

£67.99

View

See all prices

If all of this sounds great and you want to put together your very own compact Ryzen 3 2200G system, the above is one option. This build includes an M.2 NVMe SSD, 8GB DDR4-3200 memory, and a mini-ITX case and motherboard. You might be able to save a bit of money by opting for a larger case and motherboard, or a non-M.2 SSD, but I really like the idea of using the 2200G in a tiny HTPC. Of course, the 550W power supply is complete overkill, but there aren’t many (any?) lower wattage PSUs that cost less and are still worth getting. You could also go with an even smaller case, if you’re not interested in the potential for a dedicated graphics card or extra storage, though it’s often easier to work with slightly larger builds. The total is around $400 for a complete PC with still reasonable performance—and you can add in a secondary HDD as needed.

One thing you’ll want to be careful with is Ryzen APU support. Most AM4 motherboards should support the new chips, but older boards will require a BIOS update, and while some boards can be updated without a CPU (eg, using Asus’s BIOS FlashBack feature and a USB drive), others will first need a Ryzen CPU and a dedicated GPU to update to the current BIOS. AMD has a support page describing the problem, and is even offering a Boot Kit as a solution if you don’t have access to a Ryzen CPU. This sort of teething problem is common with new processors on existing motherboards, but it might be easier to buy a board locally if you don’t want to wait for a Boot Kit.

Looking at the Ryzen 5 2400G and the Ryzen 3 2200G, while the 2400G is faster, for the target audience I think the 2200G is the being a better overall choice. If you don’t want to buy a dedicated graphics card and you’re just looking for an entry-level gaming PC, saving the $70 is the way to go. Once you start looking at a 2400G, it opens the doors to a lot of other potential upgrades (eg, Core i3-8100, dedicated GPUs, and more) that could quickly spiral your build from a budget system into a midrange or higher PC that costs substantially more. AMD’s Ryzen APUs should also make for some potentially interesting light gaming laptops, though that’s a whole different conversation.

The Ryzen 3 2200G takes everything that AMD has learned from the past seven years of building APUs and puts it to good use. The Zen architecture is a substantial upgrade over the previous Steamroller and similar CPU cores, fixing the weakest link in AMD’s APU portfolio. Intel may still lead in per-core performance, but most applications don’t even utilize the full potential of modern CPUs, while many games will utterly fail to run acceptably without decent graphics. If you’re after a processor that’s good enough, with graphics that are better than the current Intel solutions, the Ryzen 3 2200G is the solution you’ve been waiting for.

Read our review policy

Ryzen 3 2200G

The Ryzen 3 2200G is the new darling of anyone looking to build a modest gaming PC or HTPC on a tight budget. It can do everything you need, provided your demands aren’t too high.

Jarred’s love of computers dates back to the dark ages when his dad brought home a DOS 2. 3 PC and he left his C-64 behind. He eventually built his first custom PC in 1990 with a 286 12MHz, only to discover it was already woefully outdated when Wing Commander was released a few months later. He holds a BS in Computer Science from Brigham Young University and has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge ‘3D decelerators’ to today’s GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance. 

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Review

AMD CPU review. Latest product shots, rating, price and Ryzen 3 2200G specs. Gaming CPU benchmarked against the biggest PC games like Fortnite, Minecraft and PUBG Should you buy this AMD CPU?

The processor, also known as the CPU, is the most important component on any gaming PC motherboard. It works alongside the graphics card to power your PC games. This AMD CPU has 4 cores, 4 threads and runs at a clock speed of 3. 5 GHz.

PCGameBenchmark rates processors by how many of the top 1,000 PC games the chip can run.This AMD CPU can run 777 of the top 1000 games — so we give it a 77% rating.

Games that this CPU can run include Fortnite, Apex Legends, GTA V, League of Legends and Overwatch.

For a full list of the games that this CPU will run and the chance to compare it to other Intel and AMD processors check our CPU comparison tool. We have benchmarked every AMD and Intel CPU and track the best prices too. No need to wait for AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Black Friday 2022 deals or some other sale to get the lowest prices!

Check out best deals on cheap processors and the latest deals on Amazon.

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
PCGameBenchmark Rating: 64%

Best Price:	$152.99

Check latest prices

---

Network N earns commission from qualifying purchases via Amazon Associates and other programs.

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Specs

CPU	AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Weight	0.1 lb (45.36 g)
Dimensions (L x W x H)	4.06 cm x 4.06 cm x 0.76 cm 1.6 in x 1.6 in x 0.3 in
Brand	AMD
Model Number	YD2200C5FBBOX
Cores	4 Cores
Threads	4 Threads
Clock Speed (Frequency)	3.5 GHz

Best Price:	$152.99

Check latest prices

---

Network N earns commission from qualifying purchases via Amazon Associates and other programs.

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G PC Gaming Performance

This processor will run 643 of the top PC games. Use PCGameBenchmark’s Rate My PC service to test your current set up and set how it compares.

Can It Run GTA 5?

This AMD processor doesn’t meet the recommended system requirements for GTA 5 but it can play the game with lowered settings.

Can It Run Fortnite?

This AMD processor doesn’t meet the recommended system requirements for Fortnite but it can play the game with lowered settings.

Can It Run Apex Legends?

This AMD processor doesn’t meet the recommended system requirements for Apex Legends but it can play the game with lowered settings.

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Features

• Built In Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
• 4 Cores UNLOCKED
• Frequency: 3.7 GHz Max Boost. Thermal Solution: Wraith Stealth Cooler
• Socket Type: AM4. Max System Memory Speed : 2667MHz
• OS Support Windows 10 64 Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64 Bit, Ubuntu x86 64 Bit. Operating System (OS) support will vary by manufacturer

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G DEALS — BEST prices

Best Price:	$152.99

Check latest prices

---

Network N earns commission from qualifying purchases via Amazon Associates and other programs.

Other AMD processors

Here are a few other options…

Good

AMD A6-7400K APU Review

44% Rating

$59.95

Better

AMD Athlon 200GE Review

50% Rating

$75. 31

Best

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Review

79% Rating

$259.98

Latest Processor Reviews

• Intel BX8070110600K Review
• AMD Ryzen 9 5900X Review
• AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Review
• AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Review
• AMD Ryzen 7 5800X Review
• Intel Core i3-10100F Review
• Intel Core i9-10850K Review
• AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT Review
• AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT Review
• AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT Review

Gaming Laptop DealsRate my PC

Game System Requirements: Trending

Call of Duty: Warzone 2 System Requirements

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 System Requirements

GTA 5 System Requirements

FIFA 23 System Requirements

Cyberpunk 2077 System Requirements

God of War System Requirements

Valorant System Requirements

Overwatch 2 System Requirements

Red Dead Redemption 2 System Requirements

Warhammer 40,000: Darktide System Requirements

Elden Ring System Requirements

Call of Duty: Warzone System Requirements

Football Manager 2023 System Requirements

CSGO System Requirements

Genshin Impact System Requirements

Fortnite System Requirements

Minecraft System Requirements

Victoria 3 System Requirements

STAR WARS: Squadrons System Requirements

The Sims 5 System Requirements

Raven Ridge on GECID.

com anabolics. Page 1

::>Processors
>2019
> AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

14-11-2019

Page 1
Page 2
One page

This year, AMD introduced the Matisse family of processors. The new chips can compete on equal terms with Coffee Lake Refresh in all aspects thanks to the advanced 7nm process technology and Zen 2 microarchitecture. We devoted a separate article to this issue.

In parallel, the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G and Ryzen 3 3200G Picasso APUs debuted. Although they belong to the 3000 series, they are manufactured using a 12nm process technology based on the Zen+ and Vega microarchitectures. In fact, these are slightly improved Raven Ridge. The

Ryzen 3 3200G offers the same 4-cores and 4-threads, 4 MB L3, DDR4-2933 memory support, 8 external PCI Express 3.0 lanes and a Radeon Vega 8 video core with support for 512 stream processors. But thanks to a thinner process technology and internal optimizations, it was possible to increase the clock speeds, while maintaining the thermal package at the level of 65 watts. Compared to the Ryzen 3 2200G, the iGPU and CPU have been accelerated by 150 and 300 MHz, respectively.

For convenience, we have collected all the key specifications in one table:

Model	AMD Ryzen 3 3200G	AMD Ryzen 3 2200G	AMD Ryzen 5 3400G	AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Microarchitecture	AMD Zen+	AMD Zen	AMD Zen+	AMD Zen
Technical process, nm	12	14	12	14
Number of CPU cores / threads	4 / 4	4 / 4	4 / 8	4 / 8
Base / dynamic frequency, GHz	3. 6 / 4.0	3.5 / 3.7	3.7 / 4.2	3.6 / 3.9
L3 cache size, MB	4	4	4	4
iGPU type	Radeon Vega 8	Radeon Vega 8	Radeon Vega 11	Radeon Vega 11
iGPU microarchitecture	5th generation GCN	5th generation GCN	5th generation GCN	5th generation GCN
Number of stream processors	512	512	704	704
Maximum iGPU frequency, MHz	1250	1100	1400	1250
Guaranteed RAM operation	DDR4-2933	DDR4-2933	DDR4-2933	DDR4-2933
Number of PCIe lanes for graphics card	8	8	8	8
Thermal package, W	65	65	65	65
MSRP, $	99	99	149	169

Let’s move on to opponents and test systems. The recommended price of Ryzen 3 3200G and 2200G is identical and is $99. But at the start of sales for a new product, they ask for 2800 UAH. The predecessor will cost 2500 UAH.

According to the official price list, the Ryzen 5 3400G is slightly cheaper than the Ryzen 5 2400G – $149 versus $169. In practice, we get 4500 UAH. against 3900 UAH.

Intel’s honor will be upheld by the Core i3-8100. Before us is a full-fledged 4-core with a base frequency of 3.6 GHz and a TDP of 65 watts. It lacks Turbo Boost, but it has 2 MB more L3 cache than its opponent. In the presence of a obviously weaker video core UHD Graphics 630 at a frequency of 1.1 GHz. The dual-channel RAM controller is guaranteed to only support DDR4-2400. With a recommended price of $117, you can buy it for 4100 UAH.

For testing, the Telemart.ua online store provided us with a BOX version of the Ryzen 3 3200G. The rest of the stand configuration is as follows.

• AMD Ryzen 3 3200G / 3 2200G / 5 2400G / Intel Core i3-8100
• AMD Wraith Spire / Noctua NH-U12A
• ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Hero / ASUS Prime X570-PRO / MSI B350I Pro AC / MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS
• 2x 8 GB DDR4-3200 G. SKILL Trident Z (F4-3200C15D-16GZKW)
• ASUS ROG STRIX GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB GDDR6 GAMING OC
• GOODRAM Iridium PRO 240GB / 960GB
• be quiet! Pure Power 11700W

Video capture took place using the external system with AverMedia Live Gamer Portable 2.

1. Synthetics in the face value with a discrete video card

9000 9000 9000 9000

9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000

002

2. Rated games with a discrete graphics card

We deliberately reduced the resolution to HD in order to better feel the difference in the performance of the processor part.

The first on the list is Strange Brigade at medium settings, where the Core i3 did the best. It is faster than 3200G by a maximum of 7%. But the new product is ahead of 2200G and 2400G by 12% and 26%, respectively.

But do not rush to throw tomatoes, we will clear everything up now. The 2400G is 1.36V while the 2200G is 1.24V. In most games, the older processor ran at 3.1GHz while the younger one sped up to its legal 3.7GHz. Hence the results. Of course, you can manually downvolt, but we decided to leave everything on the car, as out of the box.

In Rainbow Six Siege , 3200G takes the palm on the ultras. The maximum lead over 2400G and 2200G is 10% and 12%. Core i3 lagged behind the leader by 23%.

The situation changes in Far Cry New Dawn at high settings. No, the 3200G remains at the top, but the Core i3 is on its heels, 7% behind. Following are 2400G and 2200G. The novelty bypasses its predecessors by a maximum of 14%.

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey at very high settings is a real challenge for any system. And I must say that the 3200G passed it perfectly. This is the only processor that did not drop below 30 FPS. It is followed by 2400G, Core i3 and 2200G.

In The Division 2 at maximum speeds, the favorite is 2400G. It bypasses the novelty in terms of drawdowns by as much as 59%. But 3200G is faster than Core i3 and 2200G by 33% and 39%.

In World War Z on ultras in the top Core i3. It is 4% faster than 3200G. And if the average frame rate of 2400G is worse than the novelty, then its advantage in drawdowns reaches 18%. The gap between 3200G and 2200G reaches 7%.

Benchmark Metro Exodus with «Extreme» preset shows actual parity between 3200G and Core i3. Next are 2200G and 2400G.

As a result, in seven test games, the Ryzen 3 3200G is on average 3-5% faster than the Ryzen 5 2400G. The advantage over Ryzen 3 2200G reaches 7-15%. The gap between the new product and the Core i3-8100 is 4-13%.

3. Synthetics in overclocking CPU with a discrete graphics card

Now let’s overclock the Ryzen 3 3200G and evaluate the profit. Our copy without dancing with a tambourine took the 4.2 GHz barrier. To do this, the BIOS set a multiplier of 42, Vcore — 1.425 V, as well as LLC in Mode 5. Recall that representatives of Raven Ridge, like most 14-nm Ryzen, can reach 4.0 GHz, but very rarely higher. For RAM, the XMP profile was activated with a frequency of 3600 MHz and timings of 16-16-16-36.

Even under the boxed cooler in the AIDA64 stress test, the temperature of the cores did not exceed 70°C. Throttling is absent.

For comparison: in similar conditions, the stock 3200G warmed up to 68°C. Recall that the critical temperature for Ryzen is 95 ° C.

Test and review: AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G — New APU for the mass market

If customers of laptops could enjoy the advantages of the APU Raven Ridge on the Zen architecture for several weeks desktop PCs had to be patient. But today Intel got a new competitor. Moreover, the impact of new APUs on the market may be even stronger than in the case of previously released Ryzen processors. The fact is that thanks to the built-in GPU, the Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G processors are perfect for those users who need an inexpensive office or multimedia computer. And there were no serious alternatives to Intel. It will be interesting to see how well the two APUs perform in practice.

Of course, the Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G processors are ranked below the Summit Ridge CPUs, but it’s not easy to compare with Intel. If you look only at the specifications, then the competitors from the Coffee Lake line can be called the Core i3, but also the Core i5. And if you go back to the Kaby Lake generation, then Core i5 and Core i7 are the opponents here. According to the latest rumors, the as yet unconfirmed Core i5-8300H will be up against the Ryzen 5 2400G.

Raven Ridge for socket AM4

Technically, the Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G are pretty close relatives of the Raven Ridge Mobile APUs, which we tested as a Ryzen 5 2500U in an Acer Swift 3 laptop. Basically, we have a successor to the Bristol Ridge desktop APUs. AMD itself is pointing to the Zen 1.5 architecture due to changes from the Summit Ridge CPU. By the way, you can get acquainted with the details of the Zen architecture in our review of the Ryzen 7 1800X.

AMD has moved away from the modular concept. The Zen architecture once again relies on classic full-fledged cores. Each core contains four integer blocks with 168 registers, two FPUs, and two Load/Store blocks. APUs are manufactured using the 14nm process technology. It also supports technologies that AMD has collected under the SenseMI brand. Namely, a more subtle change in the frequency of the CPU with Precision Boost 2, monitoring various parameters to improve efficiency (Pure Power) and preloading data (Smart Prefetch).

The differences between Raven Ridge Mobile and Raven Ridge Desktop are not explained in detail, although they are. It is easier to highlight the differences between the desktop Summit Ridge and Raven Ridge. The L3 cache has been reduced in size: in the case of Ryzen 3, 8 MB are available, for Ryzen 3 2200G only 4 MB is left. Depending on the model, Ryzen 5 was equipped with 8 or 16 MB, with Ryzen 5 2400G we also get only 4 MB. But the L2 cache remained unchanged, at 512 KB per core.

Overview

AMD Raven Ridge APU

Model	Cores Threads	Base frequency / Boost	L2	L3	GPU
Ryzen 5 2400G	4/8	3.6/3.9 GHz	2MB	4MB	Vega 11
Ryzen 3 2200G	4/4	3.5/3.7 GHz	2MB	4MB	Vega 8

But we can draw parallels in terms of TDP, for both APUs we get 65 watts. The same goes for the number of cores and threads, socket. Another advantage of the APU is the official support for DDR4-2933 memory, in the case of Summit Ridge it was limited to DDR4-2666.

The biggest difference from the Summit Ridge is the integrated graphics. AMD used its own Vega graphics, as with the Raven Ridge laptop APUs.

review

AMD Raven Ridge GPU

Model	Compute Units	Frequency	Stream Processors
Vega 8	8	1.100 MHz	512
Vega 11	11	1.250 MHz	704

The Ryzen 3 2200G is a junior Raven Ridge desktop APU. The processor is equipped with four physical cores, but there is no SMT support, that is, four cores execute four threads in parallel. The L2 cache is 512 KB per core, which is 2 MB in total. L3 cache — 4 MB for all cores. The base frequency of the APU is 3.5 GHz, in Boost mode it increases to 3. 7 GHz. The thermal package (TDP) is listed at 65 watts, but it can be reduced to 45 watts if needed. Vega 8 is responsible for the graphics with eight Compute Units, that is, we get 512 stream processors. The GPU operates at a frequency of 1.100 MHz, the GPU does not have dedicated memory.

The Ryzen 5 2400G is only a step up. We get the same four cores, but thanks to SMT, the maximum number of threads running is eight. Also, a higher frequency indicates a higher CPU performance. The APU operates at a base frequency of 3.6 GHz, in Boost mode we get a frequency of up to 3.9 GHz. The GPU has also been beefed up, using Vega 11 with eleven CPU blocks. As a result, we get 704 stream processors, the AMD GPU frequency is set to 1.250 MHz. But the Ryzen 5 2400G runs at the same TDP. That is, 65 W remains the limit, if necessary, it can be reduced to 45 W.

Test Configuration

Together with the new Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G APUs, AMD provided a Gigabyte GA-AB350N-Gaming WIFI motherboard in ITX format and 16 GB of DDR4-3200 memory (CL14-14-14-14- 34). We used a 750W Prime Ultra Titanium power supply.

Windows 10 Pro (Build 1709) was installed on the system. AMD also provided Radeon Software 17.7 and graphics driver 17.4, plus version 1.2 of the Ryzen Master utility.

All performance tests and power consumption measurements under load were performed at the «Max. performance» setting. To estimate idle power consumption, we used the balanced setting «Optimal performance». On the one hand, this allowed us to squeeze out the maximum performance in tests, as well as to estimate the peak power consumption. On the other hand, the system did not consume excess power when idle.

We have run power consumption tests on the entire system, unless otherwise noted.

All tests were performed with the memory at the highest official AMD frequency (DDR4-2933) and higher (DDR4-3200).

Since we were using a completely new test system, some comparison tests had to be abandoned.

<>Test and Review: AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G — New Mass Market APUs
Benchmarks: Video and Audio Encoding

Social Media

Overview pages

• Page 1: Benchmark and review: AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G new mainstream APUs
• Page 2: Benchmarks: video and audio encoding
• Page 3: Benchmarks: 3D rendering
• Page 4: Benchmarks : Data Compression & Encryption
• Page 5: Benchmarks: Synthetic
• Page 6: Benchmarks: Gaming
• Page 7: Clock Speeds, Temperatures, Power Consumption
• Page 8: Conclusion

Tags

Ryzeny4 AMD Rzeny4

3 220G APUs Vega Zen Raven Ridge

comments (16)

13.02.2018 16:29

#7

dchekanov

I disagree with you. There is no engagement. There is independence. However, consider whatever you want.

Quote — Reply

Posts: 624

Message dchekanov;29184
There will be a separate test for games. While the firewood is raw and the AMD BIOS delays the gaming one. So the results are still raw. Everything is as usual.

OK. I hope we will see only GPU overclocking in this test after replacing the thermal interface with ZhM? It makes no sense to drive the CPU because of the emphasis on 4 GHz (as other reviewers and owners found out).

Quote — Reply

Posts: 624

Message dchekanov;29186
In general, do not expect miracles. Because of the total memory for games, the APU is not worth taking. In 1080, only on low settings something goes fine. So we are waiting for Core H, it will be more interesting.

Core H will be of little interest to anyone because of the price. We recall your recent news about the NUC based on the Core H 8809, which costs under 1000 €, while the memory and drive must be purchased separately…

Quote — Reply

Posts: 624

Message kachaev;29190
Not a bit. At all. Positioning and price makes Core H inaccessible and uncompetitive in this price segment. Instead of Core H, it’s easier to take ryzen 1600/8400 and RX560/GTX1050Ti. And don’t sweat it.
So 2200g and 2400G, like APUs, are much more interesting here. Breakthrough of the year — integration at the level of GT1030 (nominal) or RX550 (overclocking), with CPU performance that is not inferior to the competitor.
I’m interested in something else — how can you, with such knowledge of the materiel and the level of brand engagement, keep the Russian page of hvdlux, which is quite biased in itself (see a selection of test programs for a review, etc.)? Engagement squared? As a result, the popularity of the resource is low. And no prospects…

I would argue about bias, but reviews have been raising questions for many years due to the lack of screenshots of test monitoring or video, where there is a test bench and how the test itself was conducted.

quote — reply

02/15/2018 07:42

#11

The fact that AMD did not provide something there is its problem and nobody is interested here. On the same Anandtech, there are no problems with drivers and they have tested many games.

quote — reply

02/15/2018 08:45

#12

Message kachaev;29190
Instead of Core H, it’s easier to take ryzen 1600/8400 and RX560/GTX1050Ti. And don’t sweat it. So 2200g and 2400G, like APUs, are much more interesting here. Breakthrough of the year — integration at the level of GT1030 (nominal) or RX550 (overclocking), with CPU performance that is not inferior to the competitor.

Every gamer knows that today you need at least a GTX1050/Ti level card to play games. So for games, any adequate gamer will buy them.

quote — reply

2/15/2018 11:33

#13

vorvort

Registered: 01/28/2015
Moscow
Guest

Posts: 624

Posted by Chipi;29214
The fact that AMD didn’t provide something there is their problem and nobody cares here. On the same Anandtech, there are no problems with drivers and they have tested many games.

On roovers, the reviewer said that AMD provided the platform for only 2 days. The PRO High Tech reviewer said the same thing. Otherwise, how idiotic AMD bosses are not
call!
Can you tell me nowhere on the Web that only the GPU was driven after replacing the thermal interface with ZhM? Interested in tests in games under this condition.

quote — reply

02/15/2018 2:58 pm

#14

kachaev

Chipi’s message;29216
Every gamer knows that today you need at least a GTX1050 / Titx1050 level card for games. So for games, any adequate gamer will buy them.

Prywet, Chips. How is life young, sexual? How is your health?
Are you speaking for all «adequate» people again?

quote — reply

15.02.2018 17:34

#15

Message kachaev;29220
Are you again broadcasting for all the «adequate» ones?

Only an inadequate will buy a misunderstanding of a level below the GTX1030 and will play on it. Everyone has had prots no worse than Ryzen for a long time. What’s the point of buying another one? It turns out that $200 buys an unnecessary CPU and an equally unnecessary GPU. It’s like chasing two hares and getting nowhere. Moreover, it’s not enough to buy only a percent here, you still need to back off for fast memory! Why is this nonsense needed if the GTX1050 is still twice as fast at a lower price and it comes out of the box with a faster set of memory?

Quote — Reply

Posts: 624

Message Chipi;29222
Only the inadequate will buy a misunderstanding of the level below the GTX1030 and will play on it. Everyone has had prots no worse than Ryzen for a long time. What’s the point of buying another one? It turns out that $200 buys an unnecessary CPU and an equally unnecessary GPU. It’s like chasing two hares and getting nowhere. Moreover, it’s not enough to buy only a percent here, you still need to back off for fast memory! Why is this nonsense needed if the GTX1050 is still twice as fast at a lower price and it comes out of the box with a faster set of memory?

When upgrading, you will have to buy expensive memory anyway — both for Coffee and for Ryzen. And you incorrectly compare a subject with a game discrete card. Raven Ridge is an office solution or a base for a home media center, but not a game assembly for AAA projects. In MMORPG you can run comfortably on it, but not in AAA projects. For $169 he has no equal.

quote — reply

Log in to comment

You might be interested in the following articles:

• Best Intel and AMD Processor — Spring 2022

  2021/22 has been a very eventful year for processors. With the new Zen 3 architecture at the end of 2020, AMD was able to catch up with Intel, as well as take the lead in the number of cores in the high-end… [read more]

• Test and review: Intel Core i5-12400 — fast and…

  A few days ago, Intel added 65W and 35W models to its earlier Alder Lake processors. Our test lab received a Core i5-12400 processor,… [read more]

• Test and Review: Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 7 7700X (Update:.

  ..

  Today we publish a detailed test of the Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 7 7700X processors in the Ryzen 7000 line. They have switched to the Zen 4 architecture, new process technology, new CPU package and socket,… [read more]

• Test and review: Intel Core i3-12100F is the best budget…

  Today we’re looking at a budget processor in the Intel Alder Lake line, namely the Core i3-12100F. If open multiplier K models are not required, then the Core i5-12400 in our tests … [read more]

• Test and review: Core i9-13900K and Core i5-13600K are new…

  AMD strikes first with Ryzen 7000 processors (test), today Intel counterattacks with 13th Gen Core Raptor Lake CPUs. The latest generation of AMD Zen 4 showed a decent increase in one-… [read more]

• Test and review: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D is a great upgrade…

  A little over a week ago, the first tests of the Ryzen 7 5800X3D, a processor with a 3D V-cache cache that is aimed at gamers, appeared on the Web.