NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Specs, Price, and FPS in Games
Build a PC
| 2 GB | GDDR5 | 128-bit | 105.8 GB/s |
| Memory Size | Memory Type | Memory Bus | Memory Bandwidth |
|---|
Pixel Fillrate
38.02 GPixel/s
7%
Texture Fillrate
57.02 GTexel/s
4%
Availability
MSRP in USD: $159
No items available
Processor
Resolution
Select game resolution
Graphics Settings
Select game graphics
Offset
…
Apply Offset
Value Rating
Performance Rating
Value per FPS
You will receive
… FPS
TOP 6 Games With NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
458
FPS
League of Legends
605
FPS
Minecraft
109
FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
205
FPS
VALORANT
118
FPS
Fortnite
284
FPS
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Alternatives For GeForce GTX 950
1080p, High
No alternatives — this is the best option
Specifications
| General | |
|---|---|
| Release Date | Aug 20th, 2015 |
| Generation | GeForce 900 |
| Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
| Power Consumption | 90 W |
| Performance | |
|---|---|
| Base Clock Speed | 1024 MHz |
| Boost Clock Speed | 1188 MHz |
| Memory Clock Speed | 1653 MHz |
| Pixel Fillrate | 38. |
| Texture Fillrate | 57.02 GTexel/s |
| Memory | |
|---|---|
| Memory Size | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| Memory Bandwidth | 105.8 GB/s |
Find out which of the 2 GPUs performs better, view a side-by-side specification comparison.
GeForce GTX 950
N/A Stock
Radeon HD 6670
N/A Stock
GeForce GTX 950
N/A Stock
Radeon HD 6770
N/A Stock
GeForce GTX 950
N/A Stock
Radeon HD 7990
N/A Stock
GeForce GTX 950
N/A Stock
Radeon HD 7790
N/A Stock
GeForce GTX 950
N/A Stock
Radeon HD 7950
N/A Stock
GeForce GTX 950
N/A Stock
Radeon HD 7870 XT
N/A Stock
Refine results to filter 346 graphics cards by performance, release date, price, and value.
Click on a GPU to view more in-depth specifications and game FPS.
Calculation Parameters
Processor
Resolution
Select game resolution
Graphics Settings
Select game graphics
Sort By
Popularity
Filters
Performance Rating
Value Rating
GPU Type
Desktop
25
Mobile
0
Integrated
0
Found 346 GPUs.
Popularity
Graphics Card
Performance
GeForce RTX 3060
Jan 12th, 2021
Performance Rating
$398 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Dec 1st, 2020
Performance Rating
$439 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce RTX 4090
Sep 20th, 2022
Performance Rating
$1,939 on Amazon
In Stock
Radeon RX 6600
Oct 13th, 2021
Performance Rating
$249.
99 on Amazon
In Stock
Radeon RX 6700 XT
Mar 3rd, 2021
Performance Rating
$389.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Radeon RX 6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Performance Rating
$137.99 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Oct 29th, 2019
Performance Rating
$239.99 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce RTX 2060
Jan 7th, 2019
Performance Rating
$281.33 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce RTX 3050
Jan 4th, 2022
Performance Rating
$318.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Radeon RX 6700
Jun 9th, 2021
Performance Rating
$329.99 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce RTX 3070
Sep 1st, 2020
Performance Rating
$484.99 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce GT 1030
May 17th, 2017
Performance Rating
$89.99 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce RTX 4080
Sep 20th, 2022
Performance Rating
$1,309.
99 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Jan 3rd, 2023
Performance Rating
$925 on Amazon
In Stock
Radeon RX 6500 XT
Jan 19th, 2022
Performance Rating
$164.99 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce GT 730
Jun 18th, 2014
Performance Rating
$83.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Radeon RX 550
Apr 20th, 2017
Performance Rating
$135.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Mar 3rd, 2022
Performance Rating
$434.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Performance Rating
$364.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Performance Rating
$925 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Performance Rating
$179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Nov 3rd, 2022
Performance Rating
$1,300 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Performance Rating
$286 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Performance Rating
$214.
99 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
May 31st, 2021
Performance Rating
$758.49 on Amazon
In Stock
- Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- …
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Variants Compared — Find The Best GTX 950 Card in Our Benchmarks
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Variants Compared — Find The Best GTX 950 Card in Our Benchmarks — GPUCheck United States / USA
Performance Comparison of Colorful iGame GTX 950 Flame Ares U V5 vs ZOTAC GTX 950 AMP! Edition vs GIGABYTE GTX 950 XTREME Gaming vs GALAX GTX 950 EX OC White vs EVGA GTX 950 FTW ACX 2.0 vs EVGA GTX 950 SSC ACX 2.0 and 46 more variants of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Graphics Card.
| Graphics Card | GPU Clock | Boost Clock | Memory Clock | Average 1080p FPS | Average 1440p FPS | Average 4K FPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colorful iGame GTX 950 Flame Ares U V5 | 1216 MHz | 1418 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| ZOTAC GTX 950 AMP! Edition | 1203 MHz | 1405 MHz | 1755 MHz | |||
| GIGABYTE GTX 950 XTREME Gaming | 1203 MHz | 1405 MHz | 1750 MHz | |||
| GALAX GTX 950 EX OC White | 1203 MHz | 1405 MHz | 1683 MHz | |||
EVGA GTX 950 FTW ACX 2. 0
|
1203 MHz | 1405 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| EVGA GTX 950 SSC ACX 2.0 | 1190 MHz | 1393 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| EVGA GTX 950 SSC ACX 2.0 Best Buy Exclusive | 1190 MHz | 1393 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| Colorful IGame GTX 950 Flame Warrior X | 1178 MHz | 1367 MHz | 1750 MHz | |||
| Inno3D iChill GTX 950 Ultra | 1178 MHz | 1367 MHz | 1700 MHz | |||
| Gainward GTX 950 Guan Yu | 1165 MHz | 1355 MHz | 1674 MHz | |||
| EVGA GTX 950 Superclocked+ ACX 2.0 | 1165 MHz | 1355 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| PNY XLR8 GTX 950 OC Gaming | 1152 MHz | 1342 MHz | 1800 MHz | |||
EVGA GTX 950 Superclocked ACX 2. 0
|
1152 MHz | 1342 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| Inno3D iChill GTX 950 | 1140 MHz | 1329 MHz | 1700 MHz | |||
| ASUS ECHELON GTX 950 OC | 1140 MHz | 1329 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| ASUS STRIX GTX 950 DirectCU II OC | 1140 MHz | 1329 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| Colorful iGame GTX 950 Flame Ares U | 1140 MHz | 1329 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| Colorful iGame GTX 950 Flame Ares U V2 | 1140 MHz | 1329 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| Colorful iGame GTX 950 Flame Ares U V3 | 1140 MHz | 1329 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| GALAX GTX 950 Black Sniper OC | 1140 MHz | 1329 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| GALAX GTX 950 OC | 1114 MHz | 1304 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| ZOTAC GTX 950 OC | 1102 MHz | 1279 MHz | 1704 MHz | |||
| Colorful iGame GTX 950 Ice Knight Mini | 1102 MHz | 1279 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| GIGABYTE GTX 950 WindForce 2X OC | 1102 MHz | 1279 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| MSI GTX 950 Gaming | 1102 MHz | 1279 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| ZOTAC GTX 950 | 1089 MHz | 1266 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| ASUS GTX 950 OC | 1076 MHz | 1253 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
EVGA GTX 950 SC ACX 2. 0
|
1076 MHz | 1253 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| EVGA GTX 950 SC ACX 2.0 | 1076 MHz | 1253 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| MSI GTX 950 OC | 1076 MHz | 1253 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| MSI GTX 950 OC | 1076 MHz | 1253 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| MSI GTX 950 OCV1 | 1076 MHz | 1253 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| MSI GTX 950 OCV2 | 1076 MHz | 1253 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| MSI GTX 950 OCV2 | 1076 MHz | 1253 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| MSI GTX 950 OCV3 | 1076 MHz | 1253 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| GIGABYTE GTX 950 OC | 1064 MHz | 1241 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| Palit GTX 950 StormX Dual | 1064 MHz | 1241 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| GIGABYTE GTX 950 | 1051 MHz | 1228 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| GIGABYTE GTX 950 WindForce 2X | 1051 MHz | 1228 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| Inno3D GTX 950 OC | 1051 MHz | 1228 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| ASUS GTX 950 | 1026 MHz | 1190 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| ASUS GTX 950 | 1026 MHz | 1190 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| ASUS GTX 950 Mini | 1026 MHz | 1190 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| ASUS STRIX GTX 950 DirectCU II | 1026 MHz | 1190 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
EVGA GTX 950 ACX 2. 0
|
1026 MHz | 1190 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| EVGA GTX 950 ACX 2.0 | 1026 MHz | 1190 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| GIGABYTE GTX 950 XTREME Gaming | 1024 MHz | 1188 MHz | 1750 MHz | |||
| FORSA GTX 950 | 1024 MHz | 1188 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| Gainward GTX 950 | 1024 MHz | 1188 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| Palit GTX 950 StormX | 1024 MHz | 1188 MHz | 1653 MHz | |||
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | 1024 MHz | 1188 MHz | 1653 MHz |
GeForce GTX 950 | Review and testing of video cards NVIDIA
The first video card from NVIDIA built on the Maxwell graphics architecture was the GeForce GTX 750 Ti, announced on February 18, 2014, which was positioned as an entry-level model in terms of gaming.
At the same time, the heat dissipation of the GTX 750 Ti was only 60 W, which was, in fact, one of the main merits of the new Maxwell.
Seven months later, the top models GeForce GTX 980 and GeForce GTX 9 were born70, which were already implemented on the second generation of the new graphics architecture. The gap in performance between these flagships and the 750 Ti model was huge, and in order to fill the resulting middle-class niche, NVIDIA releases the GeForce GTX 960. With a fairly attractive price, this model was designed to satisfy the needs of not particularly demanding users.
Expanding the budget line, in August 2015, the «green corporation» presents another of its offspring — GeForce GTX 950 . The novelty is based on the GM206 graphics chip, which was previously used as the basis for the already mentioned GTX 960. In fact, the GeForce GTX 950 video card is a slightly “stripped down” 960 model. Let’s take a closer look at the characteristics of the novelty and compare it with the two models of video cards mentioned above.
| GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
| Graphics core | GM206 (Maxwell) | GM206 (Maxwell) | GM107 (Maxwell) |
| Process | 28nm | 28nm | 28nm |
| Number of transistors | 2940 million | 2940 million | 1870 million |
| Shader | 768 | 1024 | 640 |
| Texture blocks | 48 | 64 | 40 |
| Processor frequency, base | 1024 MHz | 1126 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory size | 2048 MB | 2048 MB | 2048 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 105. 6 GB/s |
112.2 GB/s | 86.4 GB/s |
| Interface | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Power consumption | 90 W | 120 W | 60 W |
| Recommended price | $159 | $200 | $149 |
In games, the GeForce GTX 950 performs as expected. With FullHD resolution, the latest demanding games can be comfortably played at medium-high graphics settings.
Game Test* (Average FPS):
| GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27 fps | 33fps | 20 fps |
| GTA 5 | 26fps | 30fps | 20 fps |
| Battlefield 4 | 48fps | 57fps | 36fps |
| Metro: Last Light | 22 fps | 28fps | 17fp |
*Maximum graphics quality at 1920×1080 resolution.
Thus, we see that NVIDIA has filled the existing gap between the GTX 960 and GTX 750 Ti, releasing a pretty good budget «middle price» in the price range up to $200, which will compete well with the AMD Radeon R7 370.
Overview of the video card nVidia GeForce GTX 950
The GeForce GTX 950 is a mid-range video card released by Nvidia. This graphics adapter is positioned as a solution for games in the genre of Moba, MMORPG or other non-demanding multiplayer projects. The video card provides very good performance at a low price and is able to run all modern games, albeit at medium graphics settings. nine0003
Specifications GTX 950
768 universal streaming chips are responsible for the performance of the video adapter, which is not too impressive. The base frequency of the graphics chip is 1024MHz, the maximum frequency depends solely on the manufacturer of the GTX 950. The video card also has 48 texture units and 32 rasterization units.
The device is equipped with two gigabytes of video memory, operating at a frequency of 6600MHz. The bus width is quite low — 128 bits, which can cause problems with uneven loading of textures in computer games, and in general the amount of memory is not very impressive. nine0003
With support for modern APIs, the GeForce GTX 950 is doing just fine. The video card will allow you to run games that require DirectX 12, OpenGL 4.5 or Vulcan 1.0 without any difficulties. The presence of support for Quda and OpenCL will allow you to work in specialized applications for video editing or creating graphics. Nvenc’s hardware encoder can be a great help for streamers and let’s play shooters. Using Nvenc will offload CPU resources while capturing video from computer games. nine0003
The latest feature of the graphics card is support for NVIDIA’s proprietary technology — SLI, which allows you to combine two identical video cards into one common system, which allows you to almost double the performance in computer games.
Although with such a large amount of video memory and a small bus, the SLI technology does not make much sense, it will not be possible to get a tangible increase in performance.
Graphics card manufacturers
Other than Nvidia, GeForce GTX 9 graphics card50 are produced by other manufacturers such as ASUS, MSI, Gigabyte, Palit, Inno3D and EVGA. Video cards from third-party manufacturers often differ in terms of cooling system, component base and factory overclocking (most often for the better, but not always).
Asus GeForce GTX 950
The video card version differs only in the design of the cooling system and a slight increase in the base frequency of the graphics chip. The rest of the video adapter has not undergone major changes.
MSI GeForce GTX 950 GAMING
MSI’s GTX 950 is called «Gaming» for a reason. The video card already from the factory has quite good overclocking, which makes it a little more powerful compared to other versions.
The frequency of turbo boost and video memory has undergone changes.
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
Gigabyte has released a very compact version of the video card, perfect for small system units. The graphics adapter is about 30 percent shorter than its counterparts, while the technical characteristics of the device were not affected, and the GPU itself received a slight increase in clock speed. nine0003
Palit GeForce GTX 950
The version of the video card from Palit differs only in appearance, the factory overclocking has not been changed. It’s pretty rare that Palit doesn’t degrade the graphics card.
Comparison with other graphics cards
Compared to previous generations of graphics cards, the performance of the GTX 950 can be compared with the Nvidia GeForce GTX 760. The devices have approximately the same characteristics and power, although the memory bus width on the GTX 760 is 256 bits. nine0003
From AMD, the Radeon HD 7850, HD 7870, R7 265 and R7 270 can compete with the GTX 950.
Even the most integrated solutions in Intel processors can only provide half the performance of the GTX 950.
Testing the GTX 950 in benchmarks and games
The video card was tested paired with an i7 6700k and two sticks of 8 gigabytes of RAM each.
3DMark Vantage
In the popular 3D Mark Vantage program, the video card averages 30200 points, which is a very good result. GTX 950 beats the R9 270 by about 1000 points.
BattleField 4
In this game, at maximum graphics settings, the average fps is 35-37, which is clearly not enough for dynamic gameplay. The situation is aggravated by constant drawdowns below 30 frames per second. For comfortable gameplay, you will have to lower the settings to medium-high.
Crysis 3
Crysis 3 is a very heavy game that can stress any graphics card, the GeForce GTX 950 had no chance. Although the video card was able to deliver 20 fps at maximum settings in FullHD resolution. To get a smoother picture, you will have to lower the settings in the game quite well.
