Benq xl2411 hdmi version: Benq XL2411 144HZ HDMI 2.0 ? : Monitors

Reviews of BenQ ZOWIE XL2411

(144Hz), connected via DVI everything worked fine, I could select 144Hz and 1920×1080 through the nvidia control panel,
now, the rtx 2080 monitor card is the same, but a maximum of 60 Hz at 1920×1080. I connect via HDMI, at first I thought that the hdmi cable does not support above 60 Hz, (there are versions of hdmi 1, 1.2 1.4 1.8 2.1), I bought an adapter, (HDMI — DVI-D), inserted the adapter into the video card, inserted a DVI wire into it and connected to Monique. And in theory it should be as before, 144 Hz, but it’s not there, again only 60 Hz

In principle, I am satisfied with the monitor, I really wanted to try 144 Hz and was not disappointed. Some may say there is not much difference. I don’t know, for me the difference is very noticeable, and then I set it to 120 Hz. You even move the cursor — and then you notice smoothness. But the color reproduction is not at a high level, you notice this when you look at other monitors, and not too high class. And so in general, when you use it, you get used to it and you don’t notice it.

In general, an excellent gaming monitor with 144Hz, inexpensive when compared with the closest analogues, but having donated a little money, you can already take the Samsung C24FG73FQI, which does not have a TN, but already a VA matrix, which is much better in color reproduction, albeit slower.
It copes with its tasks, in games the picture is smooth, clear.
If we compare 144Hz with 60Hz by eye, then the closest example would be the difference in smoothness between 25Hz and 60Hz videos on YouTube. nine0057

Bought for my son to play with. I decided to watch the film myself, 144 is a class.

Well, I don’t know why no one writes about this, but all monitors from the 144 Hz 24 inch 1920×1080 segment have only one matrix manufacturer, and these matrices have a very Big Bug, which is described as bad dithering / banding or stairs on the gradient. What it does is turn any tonal differences into a terrible mess, not just from a ladder, but from different colors in general, but on a matrix that is large in inches — oh, how noticeable. I suffered the most from yellow, which ended up being light washed yellow and green, my copy still added purple to black tones, and any gradient for me turned into a ladder from this gradient with purple stripes, it was even funny.
They couldn’t figure out the reason for this, someone says a 6-bit matrix + frts, so such gradients are normal for it, but there is no such problem on old 6-bit monitors. Someone says that the matrix manufacturer screwed up, someone says that monitor manufacturers can improve the situation by playing around through the service menu. Someone says that Nvidia is to blame, since AMD has an option in the driver that improves dithering and everything is not so terrible there.
But as a result, we have a monitor that absolutely does not know how to dither and any gradient with dark tones turns into a mess. And the saddest thing is that you can’t buy an analogue, since it’s the same everywhere. It is necessary to look towards quadHD 144 Hz matrices, but I don’t know how the situation is there, maybe everything is sad too? (Well, personally, I just bought an old model with 120 Hz xl2410t on Avito, there is no such problem there). nine0057

I recommend this monitor in general, if smoothness in games is more important for you than good color reproduction and viewing angles, buy it safely.

I have two monitors, an ACER G277HLbid 27″ IPS panel and an additional ViewSonic VX1932wm-LED 19″ TN panel. I updated my old GeForce 560Ti to GeForce 1060 the other day, without VSync the average FPS in games rose to 150-200 (I don’t like very new games), in Left4Dead2 it became an average over 350FPS, I decided that with such numbers to use only 60FPS of the monitor is it’s just a sin, I began to look at monitor reviews, compare characteristics, etc. You can return the product to Citilink if you are not satisfied with it within 2 weeks, so I decided to try to replace my ten-year-old ViewSonic with a BENQ XL2411 …. A couple of hours ago I unpacked this miracle, there is no demonstration of the product in operation in the store, otherwise it would even did not leave its limits. I connected it instead of the old monitor and put it next to ACER, my hair stood on end even in indecent places, I have never seen such a disgusting picture, even my pensioner ViewSonic produces a picture many times better, it immediately became clear to me why the «correct» 144Hz monitors cost from 50k a not 16k. I’m taking this crap back tomorrow. It is not clear where the positive reviews come from, apparently 99% are written by sellers, this is not a monitor, this is a miscarriage, which is even scary to put in the office for printing documents, let alone play games !!!! The price of this monitor is 800 rubles, you can put it in a guard closet to check if the recording is coming from the cameras. Now I will only take IPS, I am looking at the Viewsonic XG2703-GS, it is 4 times more expensive than this junk, but I will not spit on games, but enjoy it. It is much better to have a high-quality picture at 60Hz than an incomprehensible spot of dirt at 144Hz, so you definitely shouldn’t change your 60s for a cheap 144. nine0057

I took a monitor to play CS:GO and was happy as an elephant.

144 hertz give some smoothness, but I personally did not feel the wow effect. I guess that the expressed wow-effect is felt only by those who played on 60 hertz monicas with V-sync ON. My last monitor — 60 hertz, mva matrix with 5ms response, I play with OFF vert. synchronization: I don’t see loops (or I’m so used to it that I don’t notice, I don’t care), as it responded and moved in the CSE, it responds and moves on the new monitor (well, MB is “smoother”, yes). I don’t have a DESIGNATE feeling of an increase in super-mega-smoothness. Yes, moving the mouse around in Windows I see more copies of it. Yes, when scrolling through the page browser, I see that they ride smoother. The CS has definitely become smoother and faster, but I’m still getting used to it.
The real feeling of fluidity should be with FreeSync/G-sync, which this monitor lacks. It is, for example, in the ViewSonic XG2401, which is 2-3 sput more expensive (I regret now that I did not take it instead of Benq).
THE MAIN THING YOU NEED TO KNOW about this Benq XL2411 is that it’s made for esports pros, in particular for global CS players who don’t play on 1920×1080, and on 1024×768, 800×600 and top-end hardware — of course, at these resolutions they have 300-400-600 fps and, of course, they don’t run anything and no freebies-jisins are needed.
PS: personally, DVI-D did not work for me on the vidyukha (therefore, the first 2 points in the shortcomings turned out to be significant for me 🙁 ), the vidyukha refused to be friends with the monitor at 144 hertz, I had to lower it to 120 hertz, even though they are playable … On another (budget) vidyukha 144 Hz via DVI earned, i.e. it’s not a monica.I’m glad to think that I didn’t give so much money and that in the case of an upgrade to another monik, this one can be given to parents — 144 Hz will be better for the eyes, than 60. Blue-reduction and Flicker-free are here, it should be good for the eyes.Although there is another option that I will upgrade the video, there will be a new DVI-D, with which 144 hertz will be playable, and drawdowns below 150 fps on FullHD ( and therefore the lag of the picture) will no longer be, and everything will be hurt.0057

On the one hand, of course, the colors lose both ips and va, but I expected the worst, compared to ips, the contrast and brightness are higher, in general, if you adjust it, it will do, on the other hand, after 60 Hz — 144 turned out to be just a buzz, compared with a nearby standing LG ips, if you move the mouse pointer or a window, for example, everything is much smoother and responds without a visible delay, to be honest, I did not expect that there would be such a big difference in smoothness and response. In cs go, in general, heaven and earth) of course you won’t become a pro player, but playing on this monitor is just fire. I compared it with the Aoc g2460pf which is a little more interesting in terms of functions, but I didn’t like the design. nine0057

18910 ₽

What cable I need for 144 Hz Monitor? [All you need to know]

Posted on 09/30/2020 10:02 AM 15 comments

To output 1080p content at 144Hz, you will need a Dual-Link DVI, DisplayPort, or HDMI 1.4 or higher cable (although some HDMI 1.4 monitors are limited to 60Hz or 120Hz). nine0057

Content:

1. VGA
2. DVI
3. HDMI
4. DisplayPort
5. Adapters for 144 Hz
6. FAQ

For 144Hz at 1440p you need at least HDMI 2.0 or DisplayPort 1.2, and for 4K 144Hz you need HDMI 2. 1 or alternatively DisplayPort 1.4 which maxes out at 120Hz uncompressed.

VGA

nine0046 VGA (Video Graphics Array) or D-Sub is an old analog connector with a maximum resolution of 1920×1200 and 75Hz. Most new graphics cards and displays do not have this port. It can still be found on some monitors, which can be useful if you want to connect it to an older GPU or use it for a multi-monitor setup.

DVI

DVI (Digital Visual Interface) is the more common and common connector, but be aware that not all versions of DVI are the same. Only the Dual-Link DVI-D port can operate at 1920 × 1080 at 144Hz or 2560 × 1440 at 75Hz, while other DVI ports have maximum bandwidth with the same bandwidth as VGA.

HDMI

Most monitors, TVs, and graphics cards these days have at least an HDMI 1.4 port, which is good enough for 144Hz at 1080p, 75Hz at 1440p, and 30Hz at 4K.

However, be aware that some monitors have limited HDMI 1. 4 bandwidth, so in some cases the maximum frequency is 120Hz or even 60Hz (mainly G-SYNC and older monitors). nine0057

In fact, most 144Hz monitors are limited to 120Hz over HDMI 1.4, but some monitor manufacturers will use custom timing settings, pixel rates, etc. to exploit the full potential of HDMI 1.4 bandwidth, getting 144Hz at 1080p.

So, make sure the monitor you’re looking at supports 144Hz or at least 120Hz via an HDMI 1.4 port — or just look for a 144Hz display with HDMI 2.0. nine0057
The

HDMI 2.0 is also pretty standard and can be used for 240Hz at 1080p, 144Hz at 1440p, and 60Hz at 4K. The latest HDMI 2.1 adds native support for 120Hz at 4K UHD and 60Hz at 8K.

DisplayPort

In addition to an HDMI port, most gaming monitors also feature a DisplayPort 1.2 port that offers native support for 240Hz at 1080p, up to 165Hz at 1440p, and up to 75Hz at 4K.

The

DisplayPort 1.3 and DisplayPort 1.4 provide the extra bandwidth needed for 240Hz at 1440p, 120Hz at 4K, 60Hz at 5K, and 30Hz at 8K. The main difference between DP 1.3 and DP 1.4 is that the latter supports DSC (Video Stream Compression), which allows it to deliver 144Hz at 4K, 120Hz at 5K, and 60Hz at 8K, but with compression. nine0057

A mini-DisplayPort (or Thunderbolt) connector can output the same bandwidth as the DisplayPort implementation on which it is based. So mini-DisplayPort 1.2 can run at 75Hz at 4K, 240Hz at 1080p, and so on.

In addition, mini-DisplayPort is now being replaced by a USB Type-C port on newer displays. The USB-C port sends a DisplayPort signal for audio and video and can simultaneously charge (if the device supports power delivery) and transmit data to the connected device. nine0057

Adapters for 144 Hz

If your 144Hz monitor and graphics card do not support 144Hz through the same port type, you can use an adapter.

In the table below you will find all currently available adapter combinations for 1080p 144Hz or higher. Keep in mind that the order of output/input is important when using an adapter. nine0057

For example, with an HDMI (output/PC) to DP (input/display) adapter, you can connect an HDMI computer to a DisplayPort monitor — but not vice versa, as these adapters are not bidirectional. To connect a DisplayPort computer to an HDMI monitor, you will need a DisplayPort to HDMI adapter.

When it comes to DVI adapters, the DVI-D adapter must be active, not passive, which means it usually uses the USB connector for power. Moreover, for 144Hz you will need a Dual-Link DVI-D adapter, Single-Link will not work. nine0057

Active adapter combinations available: (Mini) DisplayPort to HDMI (and vice versa), DisplayPort to Dual-Link DVI-D, USB-C to DP and USB-C to HDMI. There is currently no active HDMI-Dual-Link DVI-D adapter.

Please note that these active adapters are quite expensive and that some manufacturers falsely advertise passive adapters as active and/or single-link DVI adapters as dual-link.

Also, double check if your monitor/GPU supports 144Hz on the port you are trying to convert before buying an expensive active adapter. nine0057

nine0054

Questions and Answers

Does HDMI 1.

4 support 144Hz at 1080p?

Yes, HDMI 1.4 can support up to 144Hz at 1920×1080. However, not all monitors with HDMI 1.4 are also suitable.

Older 144Hz gaming monitors such as Acer GN246HL, BenQ XL2411, BenQ XL2411Z, BenQ XL2430T, ASUS VG248QE, AOC G2460PF, etc. are limited to 60Hz via HDMI. Many monitors with HDMI 1.4 are also limited to 120Hz at 1080p.

nine0046 Moreover, all monitors with G-SYNC are limited to 60Hz via HDMI.

My laptop/PC only has an HDMI port, but my monitor supports 144Hz over DisplayPort.

You will need an active HDMI-DP adapter. Please note that this adapter only supports up to 120Hz at 1080p.

My laptop/PC only has an HDMI port, but my monitor supports 144Hz via Dual-Link DVI-D.

You will need an active HDMI to DL-DVI-D adapter. Unfortunately, no such adapter currently exists. You’ll need a monitor that supports 144Hz over HDMI, or at least over DisplayPort, in which case you can use an HDMI to DP adapter. nine0057

My laptop/PC only has a Mini DisplayPort, but my monitor supports 144Hz over DisplayPort.

You will need a standard Mini DisplayPort to DisplayPort cable.

My laptop/PC only has a Mini DisplayPort but my monitor supports 144Hz via Dual-Link DVI-D.

You will need an active Mini DisplayPort to DL-DVI-D adapter. Note that this adapter only allows up to 120Hz at 1080p resolution. Using a passive or single link DVI-D adapter will limit you to 60Hz at 1080p. nine0057

My laptop/PC only has a Mini DisplayPort but my monitor supports 144Hz via HDMI.

You will need a Mini DisplayPort to HDMI adapter. Passive adapter is enough for 1080o 120Hz.

My laptop/PC only has a USB-C port, but my monitor supports 144Hz over DisplayPort.

Given that your laptop’s USB-C port supports Thunderbolt 3 or DisplayPort Alternate Mode, you’ll need a USB-C to DP adapter/cable. nine0057

My laptop/PC only has a USB-C port, but my monitor supports 144Hz via Dual-Link DVI-D.

On 11 марта, 2023 By alexxlab

• Sonstig