AMD Ryzen 7 vs Intel Core i7: Which is Faster?
Give your gadgets a new life.
At Gadget Salvation, our mission is to contribute to the electronics reselling market as much as possible so that we extend the life of our gadgets and diminish waste. Our process is simple and seamless.
1
Answer a few questions and get an estimate.
2
Ship your gadget for free.
3
Get paid within two business days of our receiving your gadgets.
Sell Your Gadgets
In this AMD Ryzen 7 vs Intel Core i7 comparison review, we will start with the vital statistics. CPU benchmarks often offer an insight into how good a processor is when compared with another. But the thing with AMD Ryzen 7 and Intel Core i7 processor families is that they are almost equally matched in terms of performance. Therefore, this post goes into a few practical details on how these two processors work when you actually use them in real life.
The AMD Ryzen 7 has eight cores and so does the Intel Core i7. Both have eight cores with 16 threads. The Intel base speed is 3.6 GHz, whereas the Ryzen has 3.8 GHz. As for the Peak Boost (Dual/All Core), Intel caps at 5.0/4.6 GHz, whereas Ryzen reaches 4.7 GHz. And in terms of architecture, Intel uses Cypress Cover, while Ryzen is Zen 3. For the iGPU, Intel has the UHD Graphics 750 Xe 32EU, but the iGPU is not applicable for the Ryzen. For L3, Intel has16MB where Ryzen has 32MB.
As you can see, this doesn’t tell you a whole lot about how each CPU performs when installed on the computer. But looking at statistics, it appears that they should work about the same. Going forward, we will highlight a few differences, and how they are potentially are negligible. Fundamentally, it is no different to comparing different types of mineral water – i.e. they are far more similar than different.
How Does Each Processor Affect Battery Performance?
Power consumption on a laptop will often depend upon the following factors:
- What you are using the device for.
- Your operating system and software you run.
- Other hardware components.
Looking at it as a processor-only basis, here is how things stack up:
The Intel Core i7 is better by some margin if you undertake simple tasks like watching a movie on your device. It seems that Intel knows how to knock it down a gear when it comes to simpler less-processor-heavy tasks. The Intel Core i7 beats AMD Ryzen 7, and in fact, even the Ryzen 5 beats it on saving battery power.
However, if you were doing something processor-heavy, then the amount of battery power used will sort of even out. The Intel Core i7 will still have a slight edge, but not by much.
AMD Ryzen 7 vs Intel Core i7: Gaming Performance
When it comes to AMD Ryzen 7 vs Intel Core i7, it was a poor showing in terms of modern-gen gaming. Some newer Ryzen laptops are good for gaming, but as for these processors alone, they are not ideal for gaming without further hardware additions.
Neither of these processors is very good at running modern games. They will both perform adequately with the older sorts of games you find on websites like GOG. They are also especially good at running mobile/freemium games where high graphics are not required, but where lots of processing needs to be done.
A good example of this is Fallout Shelter. In this game, the graphics are fine using both of these processors. But as you progress through the game and gain nearly 200 dwellers, many CPUs start to struggle. In the case of the AMD Ryzen 7 and Intel Core i7, both did just fine, however. Added dwellers were only demanding more processing work and did not require higher graphics.
Considering modern-gen games, these processors are not up to scratch. It takes a lot of effort to get a game like Far Cry 5, for example, to run. And even though the AMD Ryzen 7 wins out slightly with all the settings turned down, it is not worth the effort trying to play modern games banking on the processor alone.
Instead, your GPU is far more important. Especially if you are a laptop gamer, it would make sense to pick a model with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 graphics, for example. RTX 3080 will give a great boost to either processor and optimize its gaming performance. And PC gamers should look into buying an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 video card for their gaming rig.
Multi-Media Editing Performance Comparison
Somehow the Ryzen falls behind just slightly in this case. Core/thread count and clock speeds are big factors here. Both processors should theoretically be equal, but in practice, they seem to differ.
For example, if you were using programs like Inkscape, Handbrake, and even GIMP, then Intel seems to perform ever so slightly better every time. However, if you were rendering with a processor-heavy program like Blender.org, then the Ryzen seems to get the job done a little quicker.
There are no doubt some good reasons why this is the case, but the reasons don’t matter.
What matters is how these processors perform with real-world use. In the cold light of day, it seems that these two processors are equal for all but a few minor differences. So choosing between the Intel Core i7 vs AMD Ryzen 7 would ultimately depend on the line of work you do and how you use your computer day-to-day.
In Conclusion
So is the Intel Core i7 processor faster than the AMD Ryzen 7? We cannot definitively say. For certain tasks, Ryzen 7 can outperform Intel and vice versa. But if you need a good basic computer, both will work out just fine or may even be overkill. And if you are not happy with your current device, maybe it is time to upgrade or trade up? Perhaps you should submit your used laptop for sale at Gadget Salvation? Just an idea to consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 vs Intel Core i7: Which Is The Better Flagship CPU
AMD Ryzen 7 vs Intel Core i7: Which Is The Better Flagship CPU | Cashify Laptops Blog
Select City
Sell Phone
Sell Gadgets
Find New Gadget
Recycle
Cashify Store
Share:
Intel Core i7 vs AMD Ryzen 7 is the battle currently going on since Intel announced its latest Alder Lake line of CPUs.
Both the CPUs have very comparable specs and performance, so we have put both of them side by side to see which one is the ultimate winner.
…Read More…Read Less
By Akhil Taneja |
Updated: 23rd Jul 2022 12:56 IST
Buying Guide
Laptop
Write a Comment!
Share:
Table Of Contents
Highlights of the Story
- Intel Core i7-12700K and AMD Ryzen 7 5800X are probably the two best processors available in the market right now and they are very popular among gamers and content creators for their performance.
- But as both these CPUs offer so comparable performance it is tough to choose just the one based only on specifications
- So we have compared both these processors on various parameters so you can choose one that best fits your budget and needs.
These two latest CPUs from Intel and AMD are some of the best processors you can currently buy right now.
Not only for your day-to-day multitasking but these two CPUs are great choices for gaming, video rendering, 3-D modelling and any task that requires extensive computing power. In the end, it is not only about how good they are but also about your requirements and what is your budget.
Both the processors, AMD Ryzen 7 and Intel Core i7 are flagship top of the line CPUs. And these are rated to deliver best in class performance and can handle any tasks that we throw at them. Although these two are somewhat in the higher price range and are mainly for gamers, graphic designers, video editors and for users who require excellent performance.
AMD Ryzen 7 vs Intel Core i7: Which Is The Better Flagship CPU
The thing with Intel Core i7 and AMD Ryzen 7 is that they are almost equally powerful in terms of performance. Here we will make it easier for you to device the best pick in terms of practical use and how they will fit you better in actual real-life use.
AMD Ryzen 7 vs Intel Core i7: Specifications
| Specs | Ryzen 7 (5800X3D) | Core i7 (12700k) |
| Cores | 8 | 12 (8P + 4E) |
| Threads | 16 | 20 |
| Base Clock | 3. 4GHz |
3.60GHz (P-core)2.70GHz (E-core) |
| Max Boost Clock | 4.5GHz | 4.90GHz (P-core)3.80GHz (E-core) |
| L3 Cache | 96MB | 25MB |
| Default TDP | 105W | 125W |
| Unlocked(for overclocking) | NO | YES |
| CPU socket | AMD AM4 | LGA 1700 |
AMD took the crown in terms of performance from Intel for a while since they launched their Ryzen 5 series of processors. But with its latest 12th Gen Core i7 processors Intel has brought the battle back to AMD, which is a win-win situation for all PC enthusiasts. This time Intel has more or less decided to copy the design of its CPU cores from Apple and AMD. The “Alder Lake” generation of chips has a hybrid core design that mixes multi-threaded Performance cores and single-threaded efficiency cores into the same chip.
In this scenario, the performance cores take all the heavier workload that requires to use of multiple threads while the efficiency cores handle all the lightweight tasks.
In the table above we have provided, you can see that the Intel Core i7 offers a total of 12 cores from which eight cores are performance cores while the four cores are efficiency cores. On the other hand, the Ryzen 7 chip has a total of 8 cores without any hybrid design.
Despite what Intel claims with its Intel 7 series they are still using the 10nm manufacturing process. While all the latest processors from AMD including the Ryzen 7 5800X are made from the 7nm process. The Intel i7-12700K runs at 125W TDP while the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X runs at a lower 105W TDP. Both the processors can be overclocked for maximum performance. While only the Intel i7 series comes with integrated graphics, if you truly are looking for the best performance from these chips you might be better off pairing them with the best graphics cards like Nvidia or AMD.
Also read: Intel Processor: A Complete Buying Guide For 2022
AMD Ryzen 7 vs Intel Core i7: Performance
| CPU | Intel Core-i7 12700K | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X |
| Cinebench R20 (Single-Core) | 757 | 624 |
| Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core) | 8750 | 11847 |
| Passmark CPU (Single-Core) | 4039 | 3487 |
| Passmark CPU (Multi-Core) | 33977 | 28379 |
| Geekbench 5 (Single-Core) | 1872 | 1619 |
| Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core) | 14992 | 9732 |
Obviously, both these CPUs are the latest offerings from Intel and AMD so they will offer very impressive performance in both gaming as well as other graphic intensive tasks such as content creation.
Both the processors have solid specs on the paper. The Ryzen 7 with its octa-core configuration offers a blazing fast clock boost of 3.80GHz while the Intel i7 12700K offers a slightly lower base clock speed of 3.6GHz. When overclocked both the performance cores of Intel i7 can reach a maximum clock speed of 4.7GHz. The same is what AMD offers when the Ryzen 7 5800X is overclocked. Also, there is another added advantage of the Intel i7 12700K is that it supports Turbo Boost Max 3.0 that hits 5.0GHz in certain single-threaded tasks.
When it comes to benchmarks the scales tip in favour of Core i7-12700K because of its raw numbers. Both the CPUs perform extremely well in terms of benchmarks but it is the Intel i7 that beats AMD Ryzen 7 5800X by a margin of up to 15-20% better performance. This should not come as a shock because in many of the instances only the Core i5-12600K was enough to match the general performance of Ryzen 7 5800X.
For Intel, counting from their latest new hybrid architecture and the new intelligent Thread Director applications, there are a lot of things that work in favour of Core i7 12700k to yield this solid performance.
As both the CPUs support overclocking you can obviously get much more from just the benchmark numbers. But in overall performance, Intel is still the favourite pick in comparison between these two.
AMD Ryzen 7 vs Intel Core i7: Gaming Performance
Due to the raw power of Core i7-12700k, it offers a much better gaming performance than Ryzen 7 5800X. With the latest hybrid core design where the CPU can prioritize tasks to P-core and E-core, it can deliver up to 10% better performance uptick. While the difference between DDR4 and DDR5 is significantly low, at this point for DDR5 we are seeing some impressive performance from Core i7-12700K. The more impressive performance in terms of gaming from Core i7-12700K is that it comes very close to what Core i9-12900K offers. It is very impressive since Core i9 processors cost significantly higher. But talking about the 12900K the performance of both is more comparable in terms of P-core since E-core for Core i9 handles background tasks in a much better way.
Also, the Intel Core i7-12700K comes with integrated graphics inside which is the Intel UHD 770. The integrated GPU provides a base clock of 300MHz and a boost clock of 1500MHz. So if you do not have a discrete GPU then compared to AMD, the best performance you’ll get from Intel.
Compared to AMD chips the Intel chips also show a significant improvement in power consumption. This is largely due to the new and more efficient architecture that Intel has introduced with the Alder Lake series. It significantly reduces power consumption and improves efficiency for intel core i7 processors. But then also compared to its Ryzen counterparts the processors still draw more power.
The AMD Ryzen chips have shown a drastic improvement in terms of power efficiency and they are still ahead of any processor in the market in this department. Arguably the Core i7-12700K is significantly better in terms of CPU performance but you will definitely need a processor that is much cooler in terms of heat dissipation.
But it is important to point out that the new 12th gen Intel Core i7 processors are more power-efficient than any of the other processors from Intel from the previous generation.
Below we have the gaming benchmarks for both these processors:
| Far Cry 6 (1080p, Ultra, RT Ultra, DLSS Quality, DirectX 12) | Average | Minimum |
| Intel Core i7-12700K (12C / 20T) | 141 | 105 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (8C / 16T) | 129 | 97 |
| Intel Core i7-12700K (Overclocked) | 140 | 108 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (Overclocked) | 127 | 96 |
| Watch Dogs: Legion (1080p, Ultra, RT Ultra, DLSS Quality, DirectX 12) | Average | Minimum |
| Intel Core i7-12700K (12C / 20T) | 97 | 80 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (8C / 16T) | 73 | 91 |
| Intel Core i7-12700K (Overclocked) | 95 | 78 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (Overclocked) | 92 | 74 |
| Dirt 5 (1080p, Ultra, RT Ultra, DLSS Quality, DirectX 12) | Average | Minimum |
| Intel Core i7-12700K (12C / 20T) | 108 | 93 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (8C / 16T) | 106 | 92 |
Also read: 6 Best Cheap Gaming Laptops to Buy in India April 2022
AMD Ryzen 7 vs Intel Core i7: Platform and Compatibility
Intel Core i7-12700K supports DDR5 memory modules and the PCIe 5.
0 standard. The Ryzen 7 5800X doesn’t support DDR5 but only DDR4 and PCIe 4.0 standards. While this obviously puts Intel ahead and makes it better for the future, none of its advantages offers better outcomes in the immediate future. DDR5 is of no use right now because mainly the new DDR5 kits are very expensive and hard to get your hands on. Also according to the current market DDR5 needs more time to mature as currently, they don’t offer much significant performance compared to DDR4 memory standard.
Also Read: DDR5 RAM Explained? Should You Upgrade?
The same issue is with the PCIe 5.0 standard, until more hardware compatible with it doesn’t show up on the market you can’t take full advantage of Core i7-12700K. Currently, there is negligible hardware in the market that supports PCIe 5.0 so it doesn’t make sense to jump ships from AMD to Intel at the moment. That being said it is better to future-proof your system if your budget allows you to do so. In the case of AMD Ryzen 7, if you want support for DDR5 and PCIe 5.
0 you might have to wait at least a year until AMD releases its new line of AM5 platforms.
Similar to what we mentioned in our previous AMD Ryzen 3 vs Intel Core i3 articles, if you want to go with the latest Intel CPUs and build your setup then it might get very costly for you. But with AMD it is a different story. If you choose AMD Ryzen 7 CPUs you can use any of the existing motherboards available in the market but with Intel, you will have to buy the new LGA 1700 motherboards. This is especially because of the newly added DDR5 and PCIe 5.0 support. Also, you will have to spend more money to get that DDR5 memory and a new LGA 1700 CPU cooler for 12700K. If you are already a user of AMD then upgrading for you might be very easy and inexpensive. But overall it all boils down to your personal preferences and choosing performance over budget.
Also read: 5 Best MSI Laptop For Gamers And Professionals April 2022
AMD Ryzen 7 vs Intel Core i7: Price
If you know the price of previous-gen 11700K processors then you’ll be happy to know that the new Core i7-12700K has the same price tag of Rs.
41,000. While the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is priced at around Rs. 32,000 and is readily available and is even cheaper compared to Intel. This makes Ryzen a better overall pick when it comes to pricing. Also, neither of the processors comes bundled with a cooler so you will have to buy one if you don’t already have one. If you are planning to overclock your CPUs then the beefier the cooler the better results you’ll get. Moreover, both these CPUs are readily available in the market so you don’t need to worry about either of them running out of stock.
Final Verdict
It’s still too soon to say how good Intel Core i7-12700K will turn out compared to AMD Ryzen 7 5800X. But one thing is definitely clear: building a custom PC with Intel will definitely cost more than AMD. But still buying Intel will set you up for many years in the future. As more hardware comes up in the market that supports DDR5 and PCIe 5.0 your system will ultimately provide you with better performance.
The Ryzen 7 5800X is also a good option to pick up as compared to the Alder Lake series it consumes way less power.
Also, it won’t set you back a lot in terms of money when you are building up your system. So it is worth buying the Ryzen 7 5800X if you don’t want to pay a huge cost to build your gaming rig.
Akhil Taneja
Explore More >
I am an Android Enthusiast and a Ninja at content creation. I love writing anything about technology and pro at reviewing smartphones. Big time expert in multiple facets of content generation
Previous
How To Clean Up Mac And Free Up Some Extra Storage?
7 Best Free Mac Apps Every Mac Owner Should Have In 2022
Comments
Featured Videos
-
Living A Life Of Chaos With iPhone 14 Pro
Since we began using the Apple iPhone 14 Pro, we’ve encountered various issues and most of which are related to iOS 16. Several issues that we’ve faced are related to notifications, Always-on -display, battery life and wallpaper. Until these issues are officially fixed, we will have to live with them. We tried to tackle some of…
31st Oct 2022
-
OnePlus 9RT Alternatives To Buy In India Under Rs 45,000
The OnePlus 9RT, a T upgrade, was out this year, although it’s only available in price-sensitive areas like China and India.
The OnePlus 9RT has superior cameras, including a 50MP primary sensor, a little more prominent display, a premium design, good battery/charging and a more effective Snapdragon 888 CPU. Overall, this smartphone looks excellent with…28th Oct 2022
-
iPhone 14 Pro Vs iPhone 13 Pro Vs iPhone 12 Pro Camera Comparison
We’ll discuss the overall camera setup & quality of the iPhone 14 Pro Vs iPhone 13 Pro Vs iPhone 12 Pro in the article. All of these phones come with a triple-camera setup. However, you might find some significant upgrades in the iPhone 14 Pro. Let’s find out the details about the camera quality of…
7th Oct 2022
-
Moto Edge 30 Pro Vs iQOO 9T Comparison: Which One To Buy?
The year 2022 is known as the year of the launch of many flagship smartphones. However, there is quite a decent competition between the phones in the price segment of Rs 50,000, and even there are too many options to choose from.
Here in this article, we’ll compare the Moto Edge 30 Pro Vs IQOO…6th Oct 2022
-
iQOO 9T Vs OnePlus 9RT Full Comparison: Which One To Buy?
We will discuss the iQOO 9T Vs OnePlus 9RT comparison in the article. Both phones come with the same price tag. In addition, both of these phones come with impressive specs and features. However, there exist some significant differences too. To know these differences, let’s explore the article and know which one to choose among the iQOO 9T &…
27th Sep 2022
Latest Reviews
View All
-
Samsung Galaxy Book 2 Pro Review: Power-Packed With Performance
23rd May 2022
-
Acer Predator Helios 300 Review: Most Recommended Gaming Laptop at Solid Price
13th May 2022
-
Asus Zenbook 14 Flip Review: Classy And Powerful But Priced High
12th May 2022
-
HP Pavilion 15 Review: Mid-Range Laptop with Great Performance
6th May 2022
-
HP Victus 16 Review – A Valuable Gaming Choice
22nd Apr 2022
Best Recharge Plans
All Tata Sky Recharge Plans 2023
All Videocon D2H Recharge Plans 2023
You May Also Read
Vivo Mobile Price List
Vivo is one of the most active smartphone brands in India.
Vivo smartphones are the best in terms of camera quality and design. They perform exceptionally well and have a fantastic user experience. The only problem with Vivo smartphones is that they do not have a fixed time for launching new devices. This has messed…
Our Picks
View All
Cashify Offers The Best Buyback For Your Old Vivo V21e 5G
7th Jan 2023
7 Best Free Online Grammar Checkers For Error Free Content In 2023
6th Jan 2023
Is It The Right Time To Sell Vivo Y30? Best Upgrade Options
6th Jan 2023
Here Is The Best Buyback Option to Sell Infinix Hot 11 Play
6th Jan 2023
Here’s How To Buy OnePlus 9 5G Second Hand In India
6th Jan 2023
Recent News
View All
Samsung Galaxy S23 Series Renders Surface Online: Design, Colour Options
6th Jan 2023
OPPO Reno 10 Series India Launch Date Tipped
6th Jan 2023
Realme GT Neo 5 Confirmed To Get 240W Fast Charging Technology
6th Jan 2023
Xiaomi Redmi K60 Series Price In India Confirmed: Details Here
6th Jan 2023
iPhone 16 Pro Models Specifications Tipped: Details Here
6th Jan 2023
New Launches
Dell Inspiron 15 3515 (D560710WIN9S) (AMD Dual Core Ryzen 3/8 GB/1 TB/Windows 11)
Starting from:
₹40,880
HP Envy x360 13-ay1065AU (6H8V9PA) (AMD Hexa Core Ryzen 5/8 GB/512 GB SSD/Windows 11)
Starting from:
₹75,990
HP 15s-fq5007TU (67V50PA) (Core i3 12th Gen/8 GB/512 GB SSD/Windows 11)
Starting from:
₹47,999
Lenovo Thinkpad E14 Gen 3 (20Y700AKGE) (AMD Octa Core Ryzen 7/8 GB/512 GB SSD/Windows 11)
Starting from:
₹85,999
HP Pavilion x360 14-ek0137TU (7C273PA) (Core i3 12th Gen/8 GB/512 GB SSD/Windows 11)
Starting from:
₹62,157
Dell Vostro 3510 (BTS-ICC-D585051WIN8) (Core i3 11th Gen/8 GB/1 TB 256 GB SSD/Windows 11)
Starting from:
₹44,990
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy1010TU (533U0PA) (Core i5 11th Gen/16 GB/512 GB SSD/Windows 11)
Starting from:
₹73,990
Acer Swift Edge OLED SFA16-41 (NX.
KAASI.001) (AMD Octa Core Ryzen 7/16 GB/1 TB SSD/Windows 11)
Starting from:
₹1,24,999
HP 240 G8 (4K5D5PA) (Core i3 11th Gen/8 GB/512 GB SSD/DOS)
Starting from:
₹35,610
Dell Vostro 3510 (D585046WIN8) (Intel Pentium Gold/8 GB/256 GB SSD/Windows 11)
Starting from:
₹33,168
choosing the best ultrabook processor / Processors and memory
We have a lot of reviews of light, thin and compact ultrabooks on our site. It may not be entirely correct to call them that, but users of laptops with similar characteristics are strongly associated with this word. In 2020, we told you about several models using energy-efficient AMD Ryzen chips: ASUS ZenBook 14 UM433IQ, HP ProBook x360 435 G7, HP ProBook 455 G7, Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 (14ARE05). And here is a list of models that have low-voltage Intel Core chips installed: Acer Swift 3 (SF314-57-735H), ASUS ZenBook 14 Ultralight UX435EGL, ASUS ZenBook Flip S UX371EA, ASUS ZenBook 14 (UX425JA), Dell XPS 13 9300, MSI Modern 15 (A11SB), MSI Prestige 14 (A10SC).
However, it so happened that throughout the year we could not compare laptops with advanced red and blue chips — Ryzen 7 4800U and Core i7-1165G7, respectively. Well, ahead of the upcoming Ryzen 5000U release, we’re fixing that.
In the previous paragraph, the Ryzen 5000U series is mentioned for a reason. Representatives of the Ryzen 4000U family appeared in mobile computers in the middle of last year, and now they already belong to the previous generation solutions. Ryzen 5000U processors, which are about to start appearing in commercially available laptops, may be better than the Ryzen 7 4800U considered in this case. However, you need to keep in mind that, firstly, the Zen 3 architecture is not used in all Ryzen 5000U models, and a good half of this series is the same previous generation, but with a slight overclocking. And secondly, the integrated graphics in the Ryzen 5000U have not changed at all. nine0003
⇡#Subject of study
It is important to understand that this article focuses on comparing the capabilities of the flagship «ultrabook» processors from AMD and Intel.
So you won’t find a detailed review of the two laptops in use here. And we used the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7 and MSI Prestige 14 Evo models.
Obviously, for a relevant comparison of platforms, processors, memory and graphics used in a laptop, one must take absolutely identical models that use exactly the same cooling systems and additional components. Only now it turns out to be very difficult to find such laptops, and therefore, when comparing platforms, you will have to take into account that we are still dealing with different devices. Nevertheless, we tried to pick up two laptops that are as similar as possible. Both models have only APUs that use integrated graphics and 16 GB of fast (by ultrabook standards) 16 GB LPDDR4x-4267 RAM. nine0003
|
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7 |
MSI Prestige 14 Evo |
The Ryzen 7 4800U is the flagship of the Renoir series of chips that are put into compact, lightweight laptops.
It is based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture, which you can read about in our detailed review. The Ryzen 7 4800U is the first 8-core SMT processor with a TDP of 15W. Intel has only 6- and 4-core chips in a close heat pack today. Moreover, the most progressive model — Core i7-1165G7 — is just equipped with only four cores. So we will answer the vital question: how many cores does an ultrabook need? Below are the technical characteristics of the compared mobile chips, as well as screenshots with the main characteristics of the laptops. nine0003
| AMD Ryzen 7 4800U | Intel Core i7-1165G7 | |
| Codename | Renoir | Tiger Lake |
| Process | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Number of cores/threads | 8/16 | 4/8 |
| Clock frequency | 1. 8 (4.2) GHz |
2.8 (4.7) GHz |
| Memory controller | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 |
| Number of memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| TDP level | 15W | 12-28W |
| Processor integrated graphics | Radeon RX Vega 8 | Intel Iris Xe Graphics |
| Graphics frequency | 1.75 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
|
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7 (AMD Ryzen 7 4800U) |
MSI Prestige 14 Evo (Intel Core i7-1165G7) |
|
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7 (AMD Ryzen 7 4800U) |
nine0002 MSI Prestige 14 Evo (Intel Core i7-1165G7) |
|
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7 (AMD Ryzen 7 4800U) |
MSI Prestige 14 Evo (Intel Core i7-1165G7) |
The Core i7-1165G7 processor at the beginning of 2021 can be safely considered unique.
The fact is that this is the first serial Intel chip using advanced (for the company) technologies and production capabilities. So, the 4-core is based on the Willow Cove cores and the new graphics core of the X 9 family0193 e . The new microarchitecture is a further development of the Sunny Cove microarchitecture, which was first used in Ice Lake notebook chips. According to Intel, Synny Cove cores provide a massive 18% IPC gain compared to Skylake architecture, and Willow Cove should be even more powerful.
The second notable improvement is the use of the 10nm SuperFin process. Interestingly, the new desktop Core processors, codenamed Rocket Lake, although they will receive Cypress Cove cores, which are quite closely related to Tiger Lake, will still be produced according to 14-nanometer process standards. So the uniqueness of the Core i7-1165G7 is undeniable. nine0003
However, you can read about all the features and specifics of Tiger Lake chips in the article “Tiger Lake: Eleventh Generation Intel Core Processor Architecture”.
And the Core i7-1165G7 became the basis for an updated Intel notebook platform called EVO. This is a kind of quality mark, and if you see the corresponding sticker on the laptop case, then you know that the device has certain qualities, functions and characteristics. Here they are:
- 11th Gen Core Mobile Processors with X 9 Graphics0193 e .
- Support for Intel Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.
- Thunderbolt 4 support.
- NVMe SSD with at least 256 GB.
- Minimum 8 GB of RAM running in dual-channel mode.
- Two digital speakers with a minimum volume level of 63 dBA.
- Support for Intel Smart Sound Technology.
- More than 9 hours of battery life in Full HD resolution and fast battery charging.
- Wake up from sleep mode in less than 1 second. nine0206
- Uses a high quality sensor with 100% sRGB color gamut.
If the manufacturer provides their product with all of the listed characteristics, and also if the device meets the performance targets, then it will become part of the EVO platform.
As a matter of fact, the MSI Prestige 14 Evo model is just one of these laptops — this is immediately displayed in its name, which is very convenient.
⇡#Test results
Before proceeding to testing, it is necessary to analyze one more point. At the very beginning of the material, we said that it is very difficult to find two identical laptops with processors from different companies, and therefore, when comparing AMD and Intel chips installed in Lenovo and MSI laptops, you need to know how efficiently they work. An increase in the number of cores in a mobile processor will certainly affect the level of power consumption of the chip. We faced this problem in earnest in 2018, when Intel introduced the first mass-produced 6-core Coffee Lake chips used in powerful gaming stations. Now we are talking about energy-efficient processors installed in ultrabooks. Thus, the TDP level of the 8-core Ryzen 7 4800U is 15 W, but the processor can work beyond the power limit for some time, which we observed during the testing of Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7.
For example, video rendering in Adobe Premiere Pro 2020 was carried out with an average frequency for all eight cores 2.7 GHz. The power consumption of the chip varied in the range from 14 to 34 W (see the screenshot below). nine0003
Ryzen mobile chips beyond their advertised TDP are powered by STT V2, a technology that helps CPUs and GPUs run more efficiently by capturing accurate temperature data from the system as a whole. Even if the processor consumption at some point in time does not reach a critical limit, its frequency growth can be limited by the temperatures of both the chip itself and the laptop chassis.
The Core i7-1165G7, like many other Intel chips, has two power limits at once. The PL2 parameter allows for an indefinite (short) time to seriously go beyond, let’s say, the rational power consumption of the processor. This is done so that the laptop performs some simple task — whether it is starting the operating system, opening a browser, or downloading an application — as quickly as possible.
For example, in the MSI Prestige 14 Evo, the PL2 value of the processor is an impressive 64W. nine0003
After a certain time, the chip switches from PL2 to PL1, which will definitely be lower. The MSI laptop has a PL1 value of 36W, but we can see that the laptop’s cooler can’t handle the load. Therefore, the power consumption of the Core i7-1165G7 actually varies in the range from 22 to 43 watts. This fits in well with the manufacturer’s performance specifications, since the 4-core Tiger Lake has a configurable TDP value in the range of 12-28 watts. That is, in other laptops, the Core i7-1165G7 can work both faster and noticeably slower. The same words apply to the Ryzen 7 4800U. nine0003
|
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7 (AMD Ryzen 7 4800U) |
MSI Prestige 14 Evo (Intel Core i7-1165G7) |
We used various software to test the laptops.
Applications:
- Corona 1.3.
Testing rendering speed using the renderer of the same name. Measures the build speed of the standard BTR scene used to measure performance. nine0206
- WinRAR 6.0. Built-in benchmark.
- Blender 2.90. Determination of the final rendering speed in one of the popular free packages for creating three-dimensional graphics. The duration of building the final pavillon_barcelona_v1.2 model from Blender Benchmark is measured.
- x264 FHD Benchmark. Testing the speed of video transcoding to H.264/AVC format.
- x265 HD Benchmark. Testing the speed of video transcoding to H.265/HEVC format. The tables and graphs indicate the average integer value obtained after five runs of the test. nine0206
- Cinebench R23 is the standard benchmark for testing rendering speed in Cinema 4D R23.
- Adobe Premiere Pro 2020 Rendering a project in 4K resolution. Running Standard Benchmark with PugetBench for Premiere Pro 0.92 BETA.
- Adobe Photoshop CC 2020. Running Basic Benchmark with PugetBench for Photoshop CC 0.
93 BETA. - Topaz Video Enhance AI v1.2.3. Performance testing in an AI-based program to improve video detail. The test uses the original video at 1280 × 720 resolution, which is increased by 150% using the Artemis-HQ model: P, HQ, MC. nine0206
- JetStream 2 and WebXPRT 3 (browser — Google Chrome). Performance testing of Internet applications built using HTML5 and JavaScript algorithms.
- VeraCrypt 1.24. Cryptographic performance testing. The benchmark built into the program is used, which uses Kuznyechik-Serpent-Camellia triple encryption.
- Fritz 9 Chess Benchmarks. Testing the speed of a popular chess engine.
Comprehensive benchmarks:
- Futuremark PCMARK10 Professional Edition 2.1.2177. Testing in Essentials scenarios (typical work of the average user: launching applications, surfing the Internet, video conferencing), Productivity (office work with word processing and spreadsheets), Digital Content Creation (digital content creation: photo editing, non-linear video editing, 3D rendering and visualization -models).
- 3DMark Professional Edition 2.11.6846. Testing in the Time Spy scene. nine0206
Games (Full HD resolution):
- World of Tanks enCore. DirectX 11. Benchmark. Medium mode.
- Gears Tactics. DirectX 12. Benchmark. Average graphics quality, 4x AF.
- Fallout 4. DirectX 11. Wastelands. Medium graphics quality, 4x AF, TAA,
- GTA V. DirectX 11. Built-in benchmark (last scene). High quality graphics, 4x AF, AA — off, shadows — soft, advanced quality settings — off.
- Counter Strike: Global Offensive. DirectX 9. FPS benchmark. Average graphics quality, 4x AF, 4x AA.
Notebook gaming performance was measured using the well-known MSI Afterburner program. It allows you to get the rendering time of each frame. The use of the 99th percentile instead of the minimum frames per second is due to the desire to clean up the results from random bursts of performance that were provoked by reasons not directly related to the operation of the main components of the platform.
nine0003
Notebooks tested on Windows 10 2004 with the latest drivers preinstalled.
⇡ #Typical laptop load
The most difficult question that you and I will have to answer is this: why exactly do you need a compact and lightweight laptop? It is clear that using models such as Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7 and MSI Prestige 14 Evo is very convenient, because you can take them with you anywhere and anytime. We are talking about something else. Someone uses such a laptop exclusively as a typewriter and an entertainment center while traveling. The laptop will allow you to always be online, use the browser, instant messengers, social networks, watch videos, listen to music and sometimes play some simple games. Sometimes, yes, you will need to run Photoshop on such a machine in order to quickly process a couple of photos — and that’s all. nine0003
And someone, perhaps, considers such devices as a full-fledged workstation, “hanging” rather resource-intensive tasks on a laptop: constant rendering of graphics and video, working with photography and sound — there are different situations, and laptops have different applications.
We think that the owners of ultrabooks often use their «camping equipment» according to the first scenario. And here the Core i7-1165G7 does not look like a whipping boy in comparison with the Ryzen 7 4800U.
For example, in the PCMARK 10 test, the Lenovo (AMD-based) laptop outperformed the MSI (Intel-based) by only 492 points. The difference is symbolic (10%), and it was obtained mainly due to the Digital Content Creation subtest. It is dedicated to multi-threaded resource-intensive workloads: photo and video editing, as well as 3D rendering and visualization — and here the twofold superiority in the number of cores of the Ryzen 7 4800U makes itself felt.
But in a scenario such as Essentials (application launch speed, browser performance and web conferencing), the MSI laptop even came out ahead. Because the Core i7-1165G7 runs at a higher frequency and also has a new fast microarchitecture. nine0003
|
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7 (AMD Ryzen 7 4800U) |
MSI Prestige 14 Evo (Intel Core i7-1165G7) |
The same browser tests give the palm only to the system with the Core i7-1165G7.
Because here we are talking about the load on one or two processor threads.
I’m sure you’ve read «Tiger Lake: 11th Gen Intel Core Processor Architecture» and know that the graphics in the Core i7-1165G7 have received the most improvements. If the built-in GPU of Ice Lake chips consisted of 64 execution units of the eleventh generation, then in Tiger Lake the number of execution units increased to 96 items. And the 10 nm SuperFin process technology also contributed to the growth of the clock frequency — up to 1.3 GHz. All this has led to the fact that in games the MSI laptop is noticeably ahead of the Lenovo model. On average, the advantage of the X e graphics over the accelerator built into the Ryzen chips was 26% — you can’t call such a symbolic difference.
Still, integrated graphics are integrated graphics. It would be naive to expect from it accomplishments like those that entry-level gaming graphics cards (for example, the GeForce GTX 1650) are capable of.
On the other hand, we see that the Intel X 9 GPU0193 e allows you to play undemanding games, as well as hits of yesteryear — without having to turn all the settings to the minimum.
⇡#Performance in resource-intensive applications
Where the Ryzen 7 4800U laptop really shines is in resource-intensive applications that use maximum CPU threads. Here, the Lenovo laptop based on AMD is noticeably ahead of the MSI laptop with an Intel chip. Indeed, we are comparing 16 Zen 2 streams with 8 Willow Cove streams. nine0003
On the other hand, it’s not like we’ve seen the Core i7-1165G7 crash. Nowhere is there a twofold advantage of the Ryzen 7 4800U over the opponent. For example, in Vera Crypt, the Lenovo laptop was the fastest by 6%. In the «Crown», the system with the «red» chip copes with rendering 41% faster. This means that the Willow Cove microarchitecture really turns out to be noticeably more productive than the «forever young» Skylake — those chips can just fall behind twice.
Things are interesting with testing laptops in Adobe programs. For example, rendering a small video at 4K resolution was 23% slower by MSI laptop — not a big lag for a chip with half the number of threads. Everything is very simple: not all operations in this photo editor are well parallelized into eight threads. As a result, Intel’s quad-core running at a higher clock speed can significantly reduce the advantage. nine0003
Proof of my words are the results of PugetBench benchmarks, which simulate various laptop boot patterns, using not only the power of computing cores, but also the capabilities of integrated graphics. In these benchmarks, the Core i7-1165G7 turned out to be the winner. You could see this before if you read our other reviews of compact laptops.
⇡#Conclusions
In our opinion, both AMD and Intel have good platforms for use in light compact laptops. Chips such as the Ryzen 7 4800U excel in resource-intensive applications (if we are talking about low-voltage processors with a modest TDP).
Laptops with Core i7-1165G7 perform better in the field of content consumption: web surfing and games. It is impossible not to notice that the integrated graphics of the X e has become noticeably faster than both its progenitors and competitors.
And yet, we believe that a laptop is chosen not only by the capabilities of the central processor. When choosing an ultrabook, it is important to focus on other characteristics, including the screen and mechanical qualities. Therefore, the test results presented in this article are only a guideline. We are sure you will make the right choice.
Intel Core i7 1165G7 vs AMD Ryzen 7 5700U: 9 performance comparison0001
VS
Intel Core i7 1165G7
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
Which is better: 4-core Intel Core i7 1165G7 at 1.2-2.8 GHz or AMD Ryzen 7 5700U with 8 cores at 1.8 GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these notebook processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments (2)
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one core
Core i7 1165g7
66 66
Ryzen 7 5700u
56
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks, where all nucleus
Core 265 9000 Core 265 9000 23
Ryzen 7 5700U
35
- Supports up to 64GB DDR4-3200
- Has 4MB more L3 cache
- New PCI Express standard — 4.
0 - 21% faster in Geekbench v5 single core — 1426 and 1178 points
- higher frequency in Turbo Boost (4.7 GHz vs 4.3 GHz)
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
- Has 4 physical cores more
- More modern process technology — 7 vs. 10 nanometers
- Appeared 5 months later than the rival
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i7 1165G7
3.
+48%
9046
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i7 1165G7
+10%
2872
Ryzen 7 5700U
2614
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i7 1165G7
10543
Ryzen0 7
+51%
15916
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i7 1165G7
+21%
1433
Ryzen 7 5700U
1186
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i7 1165G7
0902 435
+43%
6248
Add your Cinebench R23 results
nine0003
Specifications
List of full technical specifications for Intel Core i7 1165G7 and AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
General information
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Release date | September 2, 2020 | January 12, 2021 |
| Type | For laptop | For laptop |
| Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | — | Zen 2 (Lucienne) |
| Model number | i7-1165G7 | — |
| Integrated graphics | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | Radeon RX Vega 8 |
Processor
| Cores | 4 | 8 |
| threads | 8 | 16 |
| Frequency | 1. 2-2.8 GHz |
1.8 GHz |
| Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4.7 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
| Number of threads | 8 | 16 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 12-28x | 18x |
| Bus speed | 4 GT/s | — |
| Level 1 cache | 96KB (per core) | 64KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 1280KB (per core) | 512KB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 12MB (shared) | 8MB (shared) |
| Unlocked multiplier | No |
| Process | 10 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Socket | BGA-1449 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12-28W | 10-25W |
| Critical temperature | 100°C |
| Integrated graphics | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | Radeon RX Vega 8 |
| GPU frequency | 300 MHz | — |
| Boost GPU frequency | 1300 MHz | 1900 MHz |
| Shader blocks | 768 | 512 |
| TMUs | 48 | 32 |
| ROPs | 24 | 8 |
| Computer units | 96 | — |
| TGP | 15W | 15W |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i7 1165G7
1.
69 teraflops
Ryzen 7 5700U
n/a
Memory support
| Memory type | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-4266 |
| Max. size | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| Number of channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC support | No | No |
Other
| Official site | Site Intel Core i7 1165G7 | AMD Ryzen 7 5700U |
| PCI Express version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| Max. PCI Express lanes | 16 | 12 |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
nine0003
Core i7 1165G7
434 (15.1%)
Ryzen 7 5700U
2435 (84.9%)
Total Voted: 2869
Competitors
1.
