Amd b450 ryzen 5 2600: B450 or X470 for Ryzen 5 2600? : Amd

Best Motherboards for AMD Ryzen 5 2600 in 2022

Before using your new AMD Ryzen 2600 processor, you’ll need a supported AM4 motherboard. I’ve rounded up some of the best motherboards to get the most out of the processor, regardless of whether or not you desire to overclock.

ASUS ROG Strix X570-E

Amazing Performance

The ASUS ROG Strix X570-E comes with plenty of bells and whistles. You’ve got full support for PCIe 4.0 (though the Ryzen 5 2600 doesn’t support it), an actively cooled chipset, onboard Gigabit LAN with Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Gen 4 M.2 slots capable of unidirectional transfer speeds up to 64 GB/s, and plenty of RGB lighting options to boot. It’s a stunning motherboard and one that commands quite the price tag.

MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS

For Gamers

The MSI X570 GAMING PLUS is a reliable secondary option, supporting up to 128GB RAM, the latest Ryzen processors, and coming with the range-topping X570 chipset. This board supports fast networking, armored PCIe slots, and MSI’s RGB lighting system. Not bad for the price.

ASRock B450 PRO4

Budget-friendly

This B450 motherboard from ASRock is more affordable than our other two picks because it comes with fewer advanced features. What you get is a budget-friendly board with everything you need to get the system up and running. Just don’t expect to heavy overclock or to push the system past its limits and enjoy a stable experience.

Gigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI

Small & Mighty

The B450 AORUS PRO WIFI from Gigabyte has everything you need to create an efficient yet powerful Mini-ITX PC in a small form factor chassis. It’s surprising just how much performance you can get out of this motherboard, though you will be restricted to just a single PCIe slot for a GPU.

Why you can trust Windows Central
Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Most of these boards are stable enough for some overclocking and will perform well enough under load in games or intense applications. Should you need a great X570 motherboard, you’ll want to give the ASUS ROG Strix X570-E some serious consideration because of how much you get for the price.

X570 is the future for AMD processors, and if you want to future-proof your PC build, this will be the chipset for you. We’ve included a mini-ITX B450 with a better chipset for smaller PC builds, the ASUS Prime X570-P. Though if you plan to upgrade the CPU later, you’ll likely need an X570 motherboard.

Rich Edmonds is Senior Editor of PC hardware at Windows Central, covering everything related to PC components and NAS. He’s been involved in technology for more than a decade and knows a thing or two about the magic inside a PC chassis. You can follow him over on Twitter at @RichEdmonds.

Top 3 Best Motherboards for Ryzen 5 2600 (Updated 2022)

  • Best Motherboard for Ryzen 5 2600
  • Best Motherboard for Ryzen 5 2600 Overclock
  • Best B450 Motherboard for Ryzen 5 2600
  • Ryzen 5 2600 Motherboard Compatibility
  • How to Choose a Good Motherboard for a Ryzen 5 2600

While it may be tempting to go on amazon and buy the cheapest compatible motherboard for your CPU, there are some things you need to consider before spending your hard earned cash on a low-quality motherboard.

With that said, if you’re looking for the absolute best motherboard for the Ryzen 5 2600 we suggest the ASUS ROG Crosshair VII Hero.

Best Motherboard for Ryzen 5 2600

The ASUS ROG Crosshair VII Hero is by far the best motherboard for the Ryzen 5 2600.

Not only does this motherboard come with countless features, it also throws in some super kickass extras like a CPU temperature display on top of the board.

The Crosshair VII Hero will guarantee that you will get the absolute most out of overclocking your new Ryzen 5 processor.

With its 10 phase power delivery it will ensure a smooth voltage signal so that your overclocks remain stable in the most intense situations.

Not to mention this motherboard comes with ASUS’s amazing Auto-Tuning and FanXpert 4 software that can basically do the overclocking for you with just one click!

This thing even has RGB lighting that can be customized to match the colors of any setup. It’s sporting 4 fan headers and a flow rate header for you water coolers out there too.

All in all, it’s a great board for enthusiast builders, and by far the best motherboard for the Ryzen 5 2600.

Read Reviews on Amazon

Best Motherboard for Ryzen 5 2600 Overclock

It may not be as nice as the Crosshair VII from ASUS, but the X570 AORUS Elite from Gigabyte makes a strong case for a solid 2nd place.

It is based on a little bit newer chipset (X570 the predecessor to X470) and still manages to pack an impressive amount of features on a board that costs under $200.

While still rocking the same socket as the ASUS motherboard (AM4) this Gigabyte motherboard is built with the newer X570 chipset.

This chipset upgrade means you get things like the new PCIE 4.0 graphics card slots and much fast M.2 SSD ports.

One of the main reasons this motherboard was moved down to our number two pick is because unlike number one it does not include onboard WiFi meaning you will have to spend extra money to access the internet without wires.

Another pitfall of this motherboard is that Gigabyte’s included software is (in my opinion) worse than that of ASUS.

Despite those minor details the X570 AORUS Elite still remains of the best motherboards money can buy for the Ryzen 5 2600 and at under $200 we recommend it to anyone looking to buy a new motherboard for their build.

Important things to know:

  • 10 USB type A ports (four 2.0 ports, four 3.0 ports, two 3.1 ports)
  • PCIE 4.0 for faster SSD and GPU lanes
  • 12 phase VRM for overclocking (plus massive VRM heatsink)

Read Reviews on Amazon

Best B450 Motherboard for Ryzen 5 2600

The ASUS ROG Strix B450-F motherboard is the best budget motherboard for the Ryzen 5 2600 and is a personal favorite of mine since it can make a great edition to any build featuring a Ryzen 5.

Whether it’s a $1000 gaming monster or a $700 budget build this motherboard makes a great option for them all — this mid-tier motherboard from ASUS does everything extremely well.

Another reason we included this motherboard in our picks is its looks. This is by far the best looking motherboard that you can buy at this price point.

It even has RGB LED’s on it that can be changed to match the color of every build.

Looks aside though, this motherboard is no slouch in the performance and features categories either.

One downside to this board, however, is that it’s based on AMD’s cheaper B450 chipset which lacks a few of the extra features that the more expensive X470 boards have, like SLI. For most people though this difference will have almost no impact.

Read Reviews on Amazon

Ryzen 5 2600 Motherboard Compatibility

Any motherboard with an AM4 socket is compatible with a Ryzen 5 2600. However, different chipsets will affect the performance of the CPU, and whether or not you’ll be able to overclock your Ryzen 5 2600.

In addition, some chipsets have better overclocking performance than others due to the way they deliver power to the motherboard. Therefore it is important you pay attention to not only your motherboard’s socket type but also which chipset you’ll be using.

How to Choose a Good Motherboard for a Ryzen 5 2600

A “good motherboard” can mean a different thing for every build.

When selecting a motherboard for the ryzen 5 2600 the two most important things to consider are your budget and needs.

For example, if you are doing a budget build like our 600$ PC Build it makes much more sense to buy a cheaper motherboard and then use the money that you saved towards something more important like your graphics card.

However, if your budget allows spending some extra money, your motherboard can really help increase the look, performance and overall quality of your build.

Cheaper motherboards lack some of the bells and whistles that more expensive motherboards have. Here are just a few key things to look for in a good motherboard:

  • Onboard Wifi (you can save some money on a wireless card)
  • Lots of USB ports in the back (especially 3.0 and 3.1!)
  • RGB lighting (guaranteed to increase performance by 1000%)
  • 4 or even 8 DIMM slots for greater RAM capacity
  • Quality heatsinks on the VRM’s to keep them cool (like this)
  • M.2 slots for incredibly fast PCIE SSDs
  • Keep in mind top-tier motherboards come with cool bonuses like stickers and Coasters

Frequently Asked Questions

What Socket is The Ryzen 5 2600?

The Ryzen 5 2600 uses an AM4 socket which is compatible with all Ryzen processors.

Do All Ryzen CPUs Have The Same Socket?

Yes, all Ryzen CPUs use the AM4 socket type. However, AMD has released a new generation of chipsets for the newer generation of Ryzen CPUs. (B450 has replaced B350, for example.)

Which is Better B450 or X470?

X470 is better for overclocking because of a more stable power delivery, but B450 will get the job done too.

If you’re a PC gaming enthusiast and you want to push your CPU to the absolute limit, go for an X470. However, the B450 chipset will do most people just fine for a fraction of the cost.

Does B450 Support Ryzen 3rd Gen?

Yes, the newer generation chipsets still support last generation Ryzen processors, so you won’t face any compatibility issues with older chips.

The same cannot be said, however, about last generation motherboards supporting newer processors. Older motherboard BIOS may need an update if you wish to use them with a new CPU, but after that, you’ll be good to go.

Test AMD Ryzen 5 1600, Ryzen 5 2600, Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 5 5600X — i2HARD

Evgeny Serov

June 16, 2021

Tests of 4 generations of AMD Ryzen 5 processors in stock, overclocking and focusing on the video card

It’s time to follow the progress of the most popular and balanced Ryzen 600 series processors. Today, let’s look at how they behave in the stock state, in overclocking, and even indulge in a comparison at equal frequencies.

As many as 4 generations fit in one socket, and that’s not counting the APU!

test stand

    • Graphics card #1: INNO3D GeForce RTX 3080 ICHILL X3
    • Processor #1: AMD Ryzen 7 1700
    • Processor #2: AMD Ryzen 5 2600
    • Processor #3: AMD Ryzen 5 3600
    • Processor #4: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
    • Motherboard #1: MSI B450-A PRO
    • Motherboard #2: ASRock B550 Taichi Razer Edition
    • RAM #1: Crucial Ballistix 2×8 (BLS8G4D30AESCK)
    • RAM #2: G.Skill TRIDENT Z RGB [F4-3600C16D-16GTZR] 2×8 GB
    • Cooling system: Gamer Storm CASTLE 360RGB v2
    • Drives: SATA Samsung 860 EVO 500 GB x2
    • Body: Open Stand
    • Power Supply: DEEPCOOL DQ850-M-V2L

    Unfortunately, most motherboards with the 300th series of chipsets did not receive support for the 5000th line, which is why not everyone got the opportunity to upgrade. More precisely, not only everyone, few people can do it.

    And since we are talking about motherboards, then we will begin our acquaintance with the test bench with them. ASRock B550 Taichi Razer Edition, although it has all the necessary features to configure any Ryzen processor, was deprived of support — the first two generations were not familiar to her, so the MSI B450-A PRO MAX was useful for them. Now about processors.

    Having mentioned the comparison of all ryzens of the 600th line, we did not leave the opportunity to surprise you with the list of contestants, however, it is worth clarifying a couple of points.

    The Ryzen 1600 was imitated from the 1700th by disabling a couple of cores, since this has no negative consequences, since the volume of their caches is the same, and the boost per one core worked very badly for the first ryzens, its absence due to imitation will not affect to the result.

    That is, in all cases, we will have regular versions of processors. 1600 AE, not AF, 2600 also without huge potential, like 3600, which, alas, does not take the cherished 4.5 GHz.

    Stock tests

    We will start from the drain, and for processors of the zen and zen + microarchitecture, the XMP frequency of 3600 MHz of our RAM modules on SAMSUNG B-die chips is too high, so we will also postpone them until overclocking, and use the XMP of ordinary ballistics, which do not need to be introduced . All processors will be cooled by CBO Gamer Storm Castle 360RGB v2, RTX 3080 INNO3D ICHILL X3 was used as a graphics accelerator. The whole thing will be powered by a DeepCool DQ850-M-V2L power supply.

    Progress with each new generation is not as simple as that of Intel. The Ryzens did not add cores or hyper-threading while maintaining the same microarchitecture. No. Let’s make a small table for convenience.

    Wiping a mean tear, we turn to synthetics.

    In the R23 bluebench, the Ryzen 5 3600 made the largest performance jump in a generation. It outperformed the 2600 by 25% in single thread and by 33% in multithread. 2600, in turn, showed the least progress.

    In Geekbench, the gap between processors has been greatly reduced. If in the bluebench the 1600 and 5600X differed by more than 70%, now this number has decreased by more than 3 times for the multithreaded test.

    CPU-Z falls somewhere in between in terms of sensitivity to changes in core performance.

    At the same time, in Blender’s koro benchmark, the jump in Zen 2’s performance is amazing. Ryzen 3600 finished rendering the scene 72% faster compared to 2600. And this is with the same number of cores and threads!

    As for the memory test and the caches of Aida, there were ups and downs here. For example, 1600 and 2600 practically do not differ either in cache speed or in memory speed, however, delays on all fronts are much lower in 2600. At 3600, the memory latency increased again, but the speed of the first level cache, and the rest, too. There were also features with the speed of writing to memory, which passed to the 5600X. On the other hand, the latency has fallen again, but this indicator from Aida is clearly overestimated and has only a relative dependence with real performance.

    Let’s move on to games. war zone. eSports settings, recording was done with a capture card by a third-party computer. As mentioned, do not rely on the indicators of Hades, because. reducing the memory latency by 10 ns should have given a much larger increase to the 2600th, if you subtract from the 6% advantage the part that the higher frequency gave, there will be almost nothing left. The 5600X made a huge jump in performance, beating the 3600 by 33% while being a quarter faster than the 2600. In all cases, we get decent and stable FPS. But for monitors with a high refresh rate, the left processors in the drain will still not be enough.

    Cyberpunk, ray tracing ultra preset, DLSS — ultra performance, crowd density to the maximum. And at these settings, the processors on the left side of the screen have difficulty and are barely distinguishable in essence. The 3600 gives a different experience, almost pulling out 60 frames, but given that even the 5600X dropped to 57 fps at some points, the crowd density should be reduced. As for the performance gap between the processors, after the warzone it decreased, especially for the 5600X. Now it’s as fast as the 3600 as it outperforms the 2600. 24% on average FPS

    Next is Lara. The preset is the highest. 600r, measurement was made only in the third scene. Here again, the 5600X shows a significant lead over the 3600 around 35%, but this was due to the beginning of the scene, at the moment the gap has narrowed to about 25%. 1600 and 2600 differ by a couple of FPS, but here you can pay attention to temperatures. Although energy consumption sensors raise questions, temperatures will not let you lie. 7 nm did their job, greatly complicating heat removal due to the small size of the crystal. That is, even under the water cooling system, the 3600 and 5600 are more than 10 degrees hotter.

    Watch Dogs Legion, ultra preset, performance dlss. We get FPS like in cyberpunk. Only here the beams were not turned on, and the density of the crowd cannot be reduced. For comfortable gameplay on the first two processors, you need either overclocking or a strong decrease in settings, and it’s not a fact that even at the minimum settings there will always be stable 60 frames. In this game, the 3600 showed the biggest jump in performance, beating the 2600 by 29% in average FPS. 5600X is now only 19 ahead%, which is still a great increase in just one generation, which cannot be said about its increased cost.

    Starcraft 2, all settings to the maximum. When the game is using only 2 cores, the issue of their performance becomes more relevant than ever, and the 2600 finally shows a good 14% lead over the 1600 in average frames. The 3600 outperformed it by 31%, and the 5600X leads the way with a whopping 42% lead over second place, making the 5600X more than double the 1600 in the end.

    Total War Troy, graphics preset ultra, unit size and grass detail — extreme, resolution modifier — 50%. And now the results are exactly the opposite. That is, in Troy, the difference between processors is minimal. 1600 and 2600 differ by 3% in average fps, 5600X and 3600 — by 18%, and only 3600 retained its usual 25% advantage over 2600. But in one of the indicators it is straight ahead. core temperature. By as much as 20 C, it is hotter than the opponents on the left, and even the 5600X nervously smokes on the sidelines. Fortunately, his tensions are in much calmer limits.

    CS:GO. Settings to minimum, anti-aliasing to maximum. As in StarCraft, the 5600X again took off with might and main, surpassing its father by almost 40% and its great-grandfather by 120%. 2600 this time went 20% ahead of 1600, hinting at the usefulness of the additional payment for oneself. In previous tests, these processors were so similar that at one time an additional fee of a thousand or two did not seem justified.

    On average, we have fairly even results in the ward in the sense that as far as the average FPS grew, the smaller 1 and 0.1% grew approximately the same. And thanks to low-flow starcraft with counter 2600, on average, it is 8% faster than 1600, without them 4-5% would have come out.

    Overclocking tests

    Now acceleration. We replace ballistics with bidai, and here everything is according to the usual scheme. 5600X overclocked via Curve Optimizer with removal of all limits along the way, memory is also according to the standard for 3800 MHz bi-dais with the first timing of 14.3866 MHz and higher are unstable, they have already been checked on 4 boards, system errors pop up everywhere.

    The ryzen 3600 cores are fixed at 4375 MHz, and the memory is configured exactly the same as on the 5600X.

    Our 2600 stars from the sky are not enough. 4100 MHz came out by cores, and the best memory setting option is 3333 MHz with the first timing of 12. CL13 is not set, since our modules are unstable with Gear Down Mode disabled, and 3533 MHz CL14 is obviously worse. 3600 MHz and above are not stable on this motherboard.

    For 1600, the memory overclocking is the same, and the cores were taken 200 MHz lower at the same voltage. That is, in general, there is an increase in the potential for overclocking memory and cores. Somehow I even forgot how problematic the memory setup was on the first two generations.

    In Hades, nothing has changed globally, the ratios of delays, speeds, and the like have remained within the same limits. Except that the L3 speed of the 5600X has grown a lot, which raises questions rather to hell. Well, again we see a much lower latency in 2600 compared to 1600, but from the games we already realized that we need to be careful about this indicator.

    In the bluebench, the Ryzen 1600’s lag has narrowed. It is not surprising — he increased his frequency the most with overclocking.

    In geekbench and CPU-Z, the same is true, as well as in the blender subtest — koro. The gap has only slightly narrowed. With each new generation, progress is being made in squeezing all the juice out of the processor. Even the ghostly 3300X out of the box had almost maximum frequencies, and now we are comparing overclocking options for 5000th ryzens, although we ourselves understand that we are only squeezing out an additional 200 MHz for show. The main performance boost comes with memory tuning, increasing the frequency of infinity factories and removing limits from the processor.

    We return to the warzone and see an excellent FPS. And so, it would seem that the 5600X has no core overclocking at all, and a large cache should have reduced the gain from memory overclocking, but the difference with the gain for other processors is not so great. Compared to stock, 5600X accelerated by 22%, and 1600 — by 24%, but this is a warzone, where the error is quite high, we will continue to monitor.

    In cyberpunk, overclocking gave noticeably more. And the increase is almost equal. The average FPS has increased by a third in all cases, making the gameplay much more enjoyable. 1600 in stock and overclocked are completely different processors. In fact, on it we got the same fps that the 3600 had in stock. The overclocked 3600 is a little faster than the stock 5600X, which means that with a little effort, you can get a more expensive processor. Well, you already know this, initially this was the meaning of domestic overclocking.

    Differences appeared in the chest. 2600 increased all indicators again by a third, but other processors are lagging behind. In 1600 and 3600, the increase from overclocking varies in the region of 27-28%, while in 5600X it is the least — 25%. But even so, the differences in sensations between the processors have not changed. Between 1600 and 2600, although the difference has grown, it is still incredibly difficult to distinguish them without monitoring, and 3600 and 5600X are still far ahead.

    The situation is similar in dogs. 2600 began to prepare a third more frames per second, and for the rest of the ryzens this figure increased by a little more than a quarter, but even so, the gameplay on the 1600th, like in cyberpunk, became much more comfortable.

    But in StarCraft, the balance of power has leveled off a bit. 1600 received the largest increase among all participants. Its FPS increased by 27% compared to the stock, in 2600 — by 24%, 3600 — only by 20%, and 5600X accelerated by only 15%. That is, the voluminous integral 32-megabyte L3 cache could just have an effect here, and the frequency of its cores has grown nothing at all.

    In Troy, the results are similar to lara and dogs. 2600 increased its fps by 30%, and the rest by a quarter. Temperatures have also risen markedly. Previously, in 1600 and 2600 they were in the region of 40C, and now they are about 60. This is far from the limit, which allows you to easily use ordinary four-pipe towers for cooling, as long as the case is ventilated. 3600 and 5600X are 10C hotter, and something simpler than the aforementioned coolers will not be enough for them, or you will have to change overclocking to a less aggressive one.

    The most interesting event happened in counter. The 5600X did not benefit from memory overclocking. His fps increased a little thanks to the whore settings, but no more. That is, we can assume that the misses in its large cache have come to naught. However, judging by the fact that in multi-threaded games overclocking gave about the same numbers as 1600 ryzen, the amount of cache for modern massive games is so small for modern massive games that misses happen all the time. Here, as in Starcraft, 1600 received an increase from overclocking as 2600 and 3600 combined — 25%. Their FPS increased by 12 and 13% respectively, which again reduced the difference between 1600 and 2600 to a minimum.

    We go back into the ward with average values ​​and see that nothing has changed much. Yes, now the 5600X is on average not 79% faster, but 69% faster, but this is still a huge difference, and the first two generations still differ by less than 10%, except that now their gap has become more even from game to game, and in overclocking it is almost impossible to distinguish them even in Starcraft and Counter.

    GPU Focused Benchmarks

    These were tests without emphasis on the video card. In such conditions, the 3600 and 5600X are head and shoulders above their ancestors, however, in many story single games, the emphasis is on the video card, whatever it is. And adjusting the FPS to the value of “at least 60”, only the resolution and preset settings change. What are the differences in this case?

    Indeed, starting from the 3000 series, resizable bar and PCI Express 4 versions became available. Let’s quickly run through three games, leaving the RTX 3080 in the booth and the processors overclocked.

    In cyberpunk, we change the resolution to 4k, the settings preset to the penultimate one and the dlss to performance. We will also change the scene to the night one, it has higher requirements for the video card and less for the processor part. Here the Resizable Bar gives a boost, which is seen between the risers in the center.

    DOOM Eternal, graphics preset — ultra nightmare, 4K. All the same. The Resizable Bar gives the minimum difference in average FPS, but in addition there are differences in the amount of stutters during automatic saves, which is why the smaller 0.1% differs. Is this a reason for an upgrade? Of course not.

    Resident Evil 8, the maximum graphics preset will be seasoned with an average RTX level, the resolution is still Ultra HD. Here, the Resizable Bar does not give an increase, which reduces the already intangible difference to nothing. That is, for those players who are content with 60 fps in single games, whether it be 1060 in Full HD or 3080 in 4K, there is not much difference. It will appear only in very demanding games up to the processor, in the stock state, or if you want to achieve more than 60 fps. As for the lack of Resizable Bar and the obsolete PCI version, today the loss is small. And the desire to unscrew the settings to the maximum is sometimes absurd.

    Look, there is a trace on one half, but not on the other. Try to guess in the comments where it is and why you think so. And we’re moving on to the last part.

    Let’s compare processors at equal frequencies and voltages. This is not an IPC comparison, but mostly overindulgence, but it’s interesting how much performance has increased, all other things being equal, and what’s with the temperatures.

    For example, in the bluebench, Ryzen 2600 still scored more points than 1600, and the most interesting thing is that in multithreading, all processors have a greater lead, as if SMT work also improved with each generation, but we don’t dare to pass off our fictions as truth. There are dozens of reasons for this behavior.

    In geekbench, on the contrary, in multithreading, the difference is less, but here it is easily explained by slow memory and algorithms for calculating the points of the test itself.

    CPU-Z turned out to be the most amorphous, here 1600 and 5600X differ in multithreading by only 16%,

    But in the Coro benchmark subtest, the 3600 blender still demonstrates a huge lead over its ancestors.

    In Aida, memory latency remains unchanged, but the equal frequency made it clear that the cache speeds are the same for both zen with zen +, and for zen 2 with zen 3.

    Let’s also take a look at the top three games to see how they were affected by microarchitectural improvements without taking into account the change in frequency.

    For example, in Watch Dogs, the stock 5600X outperformed the 1600 by 57% in average FPS, and now only by 45%. And what’s funny, reducing the frequency of the cores by about 800 MHz led to the loss of only three frames on average, that is, a 4% drop in FPS, which is generally ridiculous.

    But in StarCraft, instead of 78 fps, we got 62 on 5600X. Which corresponds to a 20% drop in core frequency. Well, the 5600X now exceeds the 1600 by no more than 2 times, but only 1.5 times, which is also very commendable.

    In three runs, the 1600 and 2600 are equal in average FPS, but in rare and very rare events, the refresh is ahead, and the 3600 and 5600X step identically in performance. At equal voltages, power consumption sensors show some rubbish that is not amenable to analytics, but by temperatures it is quite possible to judge that the right processors are similar to each other in terms of core temperature at equal voltage, just like the left ones are identical to each other, but the transition to 7 nm is a priori significantly complicates the removal of heat from the crystal.

    Conclusion

    This is how the Ryzens progressed. The 2000s were only a small improvement over the 1st generation, and the 3000s made a huge breakthrough, a breakthrough. On the other hand, Zen 3, while remaining on the same process technology and socket, also made a great jump in performance, especially in terms of gaming, sometimes identical to that of the 3600.

    And before you close the material, share this in the comments: there is someone among you who planned an upgrade, but after this video he changed his mind, and vice versa. Very curious to see your thoughts. Well, about the tracing in the resident, also try to guess.

    That’s all. Thanks for reading. Do not be ill. And see you again.

      227 motherboards support AMD Ryzen 5000 processors. Complete list of compatible models

      It’s no secret that AMD Ryzen 5000 (Vermeer) processors are compatible with motherboards based on the B450, X470, A520, B550 and X570 chipsets — but only those for which it is released microcode AGESA (AMD Generic Encapsulated Software Architecture) ComboAM4v2PI version 1.0.8.0 and higher. However, at the initial stage, even the BIOS version based on AGESA 1.0.8.0 did not guarantee stable operation of the system. After that, AGESA ComboAM4v2PI 1.0.8.0, 1.0.8.1 and 1.08.3, as well as ComboAM4v2PI 1.1.0.0, were released, which not only expanded the coverage of motherboards compatible with the Ryzen 5000 CPU, but also corrected a number of nuances that arose.

      Motherboard manufacturers try to release updated BIOS versions as often as possible, but some firmwares are still built on AGESA beta versions. Therefore, the source collected and listed all consumer motherboard models from major manufacturers that currently support Zen3 processors. Perhaps this data will be useful when choosing a Ryzen 5000 or buying a new processor and a new motherboard.

      So the list looks like this:

      Asus motherboards based on B450 chipset (AGESA 1.0.8.0):

      • Prime B450M-A
      • Prime B450M-A II
      • Prime B450M-K
      • Prime B450-Plus
      • TUF B450M-Plus Gaming
      • TUF Gaming B450M-Plus II
      • TUF B450M-Pro Gaming
      • TUF Gaming B450M-Pro II
      • TUF B450M-Pro S.
      • TUF B450-Plus Gaming
      • TUF B450-Pro Gaming
      • ROG Strix B450-F Gaming
      • ROG Strix B450-F Gaming II
      • ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
      • ROG Strix B450-I Gaming

      Asus motherboards based on X470 chipset (AGESA 1. 0.8.0):

      • Prime X470-Pro
      • TUF X470-Plus Gaming
      • ROG Strix X470-F Gaming
      • ROG Strix X470-I Gaming
      • ROG Crosshair VII Hero
      • ROG Crosshair VII Hero (Wi-Fi)

      Asus motherboards based on A520 chipset (AGESA 1.1.0.0):

      • Prime A520-A
      • Prime A520M-E
      • Prime A520M-K
      • Pro A520M-C/CSM
      • TUF Gaming A520M-Plus

      Asus motherboards based on B550 chipset (AGESA 1.1.1.0):

      • Prime B550M-K
      • Prime B550M-A
      • Prime B550M-A (Wi-Fi)
      • Prime B550-Plus
      • TUF Gaming B550M-Plus
      • TUF Gaming B550M-Plus (Wi-Fi)
      • TUF Gaming B550-Plus
      • ROG Strix B550-A Gaming
      • ROG Strix B550-I Gaming
      • ROG Strix B550-F Gaming
      • ROG Strix B550-F Gaming (Wi-Fi)
      • ROG Strix B550-E Gaming
      • ROG Strix B550-XE Gaming (Wi-Fi)

      Asus motherboards based on X570 chipset (AGESA 1. 1.0.0):

      • Prime X570-P
      • Prime X570-Pro
      • Pro WS X570-ACE
      • TUF Gaming X570-Plus
      • TUF Gaming X570-Plus (Wi-Fi)
      • TUF Gaming X570-Pro (Wi-Fi)
      • ROG Strix X570-E Gaming
      • ROG Strix X570-F Gaming
      • ROG Strix X570-I Gaming
      • ROG Crosshair VIII Impact
      • ROG Crosshair VIII Hero
      • ROG Crosshair VIII Dark HERO
      • ROG Crosshair VIII Hero (Wi-Fi)
      • ROG Crosshair VIII Formula

      ASRock B450 motherboards (AGESA 1.1.0.0):

      • B450M/ac
      • B450M/ac R2.0
      • B450M Pro4
      • B450M Pro4 R2.0
      • B450M Pro4-F
      • B450M Steel Legend
      • B450M-HDV
      • B450M-HDV R4.0
      • B450 Pro4
      • B450 Pro4 R2.0
      • B450 Steel Legend
      • Fatal1ty B450 Gaming K4
      • Fatal1ty B450 Gaming-ITX/ac

      ASRock A520 (AGESA 1. 1.0.0) motherboards:

      • A520M Pro4
      • A520M-HDV
      • A520M-HVS
      • A520M-ITX/ac

      ASRock B550 motherboards (AGESA 1.1.0.0):

      • B550M/ac
      • B550M-HDV
      • B550M Pro4
      • B550M Phantom Gaming 4
      • B550M ITX/ac
      • B550M Steel Legend
      • B550 Pro4
      • B550 Extreme4
      • B550 Phantom Gaming 4
      • B550 Phantom Gaming 4/ac
      • B550 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ax
      • B550 PG Velocita
      • B550 Steel Legend
      • B550 Taichi
      • B550 Taichi Razer Edition

      ASRock X570 motherboards (AGESA 1.1.0.0):

      • X570M Pro4
      • X570 Phantom Gaming 4
      • X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Wi-Fi ax
      • X570 Phantom Gaming 4S
      • X570 Phantom Gaming X
      • X570 PG Velocita
      • X570 Phantom Gaming-ITX/TB3
      • X570 Steel Legend
      • X570 Steel Legend Wi-Fi ax
      • X570 Pro4
      • X570 Extreme4
      • X570 Extreme4 Wi-Fi ax
      • X570 Taichi
      • X570 Taichi Razer Edition
      • X570 Creator
      • X570 AQUA

      Biostar motherboard based on A520 chipset (AGESA 1. 1.0.0):

      • A520MH

      Biostar motherboards based on B550 chipset (AGESA 1.1.0.0):

      • B550MH
      • B550GTA
      • B550GTQ

      Biostar motherboards based on X570 chipset (AGESA 1.1.0.0):

      • X570GT
      • X570GT8
      • X570GTA

      Gigabyte B450 motherboards (AGESA 1.1.0.0):

      • B450M H
      • B450M S2H
      • B450M S2H V2
      • B450M Gaming
      • B450M DS3H
      • B450M DS3H V2
      • B450M DS3H WiFi
      • B450M Aorus Elite
      • B450 Aorus M
      • B450 Aorus Pro
      • B450 Aorus Pro WiFi
      • B450 Gaming X
      • B450 Aorus Elite
      • B450 Aorus Elite V2
      • B450 I Aorus Pro WiFi

      Gigabyte X470 motherboards (AGESA 1.1.0.0):

      • X470 Aorus Gaming 5 Wi-Fi
      • X470 Aorus Gaming 7 Wi-Fi
      • X470 Aorus Gaming 7 Wi-Fi-50
      • X470 Aorus Ultra Gaming

      Gigabyte motherboards based on the A520 chipset (AGESA 1. 1.0.0):

      • A520M H
      • A520M S2H
      • A520M DS3H
      • A520 Aorus Elite
      • A520I AC

      Gigabyte B550 motherboards (AGESA 1.1.0.0):

      • B550M H
      • B550M S2H
      • B550M DS3H
      • B550M DS3H AC
      • B550M Gaming
      • B550 Gaming X
      • B550 Gaming X V2
      • B550M Aorus Elite
      • B550M Aorus Pro
      • B550M Aorus Pro-P
      • B550I Aorus Pro AX
      • B550 Aorus Pro
      • B550 Aorus Pro AC
      • B550 Aorus Pro AX
      • B550 Aorus Pro V2
      • B550 Aorus Elite
      • B550 Aorus Elite V2
      • B550 Aorus Elite AX
      • B550 Aorus Elite AX V2
      • B550 Aorus Master
      • B550 Vision D

      Gigabyte motherboards based on the X570 chipset (AGESA 1.1.0.0):

      • X570 UD
      • X570 Gaming X
      • X570 Aorus Pro
      • X570 Aorus Pro Wi-Fi
      • X570 Aorus Elite
      • X570 Aorus Elite WiFi
      • X570 Aorus Ultra
      • X570 Aorus Master
      • X570 Aorus Xtreme
      • X570 I Aorus Pro Wi-Fi

      MSI B450 motherboards (AGESA 1. 1.0.0):

      • B450M-A Pro MAX
      • B450M Pro-VDH
      • B450M Pro-VDH MAX
      • B450M Pro-VDH V2
      • B450M Pro-VDH Plus
      • B450M Pro-M2
      • B450M Pro-M2 MAX
      • B450M Pro-M2 V2
      • B450M Mortar
      • B450M Mortar MAX
      • B450M Mortar Titanium
      • B450M Gaming Plus
      • B450M Bazooka
      • B450M Bazooka MAX Wi-Fi
      • B450M Bazooka V2
      • B450M Bazooka Plus
      • B450I Gaming Plus AC
      • B450I Gaming Plus MAX Wi-Fi
      • B450-A Pro
      • B450-A Pro MAX
      • B450 Tomahawk
      • B450 Tomahawk MAX
      • B450 Tomahawk MAX II
      • B450 Gaming Plus
      • B450 Gaming Plus MAX
      • B450 Gaming Pro Carbon AC

      MSI X470 motherboards (AGESA 1.1.0.0):

      • X470 Gaming Plus
      • X470 Gaming Plus MAX
      • X470 Gaming Pro
      • X470 Gaming Pro MAX
      • X470 Gaming Pro Carbon
      • X470 Gaming Pro Carbon AC
      • X470 Gaming M7 AC

      MSI A520 motherboards (AGESA 1.

On By alexxlab
2024 © All rights reserved